Difference between revisions of "Holotopia"

From Knowledge Federation
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<div class="page-header" ><h1>Holotopia</h1></div>
 
<div class="page-header" ><h1>Holotopia</h1></div>
 +
 +
div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Background</h4></div>
 +
<div class="col-md-7">
 +
[[File:Modernity.jpg]]
 +
<small>By depicting our civilization as a bus, and our still <em>traditional</em> way of handling information and knowledge as its candle headlights, the Modernity <em>ideogram</em> renders our contemporary condition in a nutshell—and suggests what is to be done.</small>
 +
<p>We have developed and proposed <em>knowledge federation</em> as a new approach to knowledge, or technically a  [[Holotopia: Paradigm|<em>paradigm</em>]]. In <em>knowledge federation</em>, information and knowledge are considered as created by people for people, to fulfill all those essential purposes that information and knowledge need to fulfill; notably to provide us suitable "know-what" or orientation, in the complex reality we've created.</p> 
 +
</div> </div>
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Seeing things whole</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Seeing things whole</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
<p>We have proposed a new approach to knowledge, or technically a [[Holotopia: Paradigm|<em>paradigm</em>]]. We'll refer to it here by its pseudonym [[Holotopia: Holoscope|<em>holoscope</em>]], which points to its distinguishing characteristic—that it allows us to combine disparate pieces of information together, and show a theme or an issue from all sides; see it as a whole.  
+
[[File:Holoscope.jpg]]
 +
<p>We here refer to the proposed approach to knowledge by its pseudonym [[Holotopia: Holoscope|<em>holoscope</em>]], to points to its distinguishing characteristic—namely that it allows us to combine disparate pieces of information together, and show a theme or an issue from all sides. So that we may see it as a whole.  
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
 
Science gave us new ways to look at the world, and our vision expanded beyond bounds. The telescope and the microscope enabled us to see the things that were too distant or too small to be seen by the naked eye. At the same time, science had the tendency to keep us focused on things that were either too distant or too small to be relevant – compared to all those big things right in front of our eyes, which now demand our attention. The <em>holoscope</em>  is conceived as way to look at the world that helps us see any chosen thing or theme as a whole – from all sides; and in correct proportions.
 
Science gave us new ways to look at the world, and our vision expanded beyond bounds. The telescope and the microscope enabled us to see the things that were too distant or too small to be seen by the naked eye. At the same time, science had the tendency to keep us focused on things that were either too distant or too small to be relevant – compared to all those big things right in front of our eyes, which now demand our attention. The <em>holoscope</em>  is conceived as way to look at the world that helps us see any chosen thing or theme as a whole – from all sides; and in correct proportions.
Line 10: Line 19:
 
</p>  
 
</p>  
 
[[File:Perspective-S.jpg]]
 
[[File:Perspective-S.jpg]]
<small>Things and issues tend to have sides that are obvious, and sides that are subtle. The purpose of the <em>holoscope</em> is to illuminate what has remained hidden, and show us the whole in correct shape and proportions. When applied to an issue, the <em>holoscope</em> suggests a way in which it may need to be handled.</small>
+
<small>A purpose of the <em>holoscope</em> is to illuminate what has remained hidden, so that we may see the whole in correct shape and proportions.</small>
<p> A complete model (or technically a [[Holotopia: Prototype|<em>prototype</em>]]) of the [[Holotopia: Holoscope|<em>holoscope</em>]] having been described on our website Holoscope.org, and explained in a variety of ways on Holoscope.info, we here describe a proof of concept application, which is in development. We present the <em>holotopia</em> as an answer to the question "What difference could this new approach to knowledge make?"
+
<p> A complete model (or technically a [[Holotopia: Prototype|<em>prototype</em>]]) of the [[Holotopia: Holoscope|<em>holoscope</em>]] having been described on Holoscope.org, and explained in a variety of ways on Holoscope.info, it remains to provide a proof of concept application. We present the <em>holotopia</em> as an answer to the question "What difference might the <em>holoscope</em> make?"
 
</p>  
 
</p>  
[[File:Modernity.jpg]]
 
<small>By depicting our society as a bus, and the way we handle knowledge as a pair of candle headlights, the <em>holoscope</em> renders the nature of our condition in a nutshell—and suggests a natural way to respond to it.</small>
 
<p>The above metaphorical image both defines the [[holoscope|<em>holoscope</em>]] a bit more precisely, and already suggests an answers the question we've just asked, about the difference it may make. The essence of the [[holoscope|<em>holoscope</em>]] proposal is that it changes radically our <em>relationship</em> with knowledge and information—and our relationship with the world, <em>through</em> knowledge and information. Yes, we too enjoy a candlelight dinner. But what we do with information, and with knowledge, <em>must</em> be tailored to the purpose of seeing what needs to be seen. We cannot continue handling our affairs  'in the light of the candle'. We must <em>create</em>, rather than inherit, the way we see the world.</p>
 
<p><em>Only then</em> shall we be able to see how to use the power that the technology has given us meaningfully and safely.</p>
 
 
</div> </div>  
 
</div> </div>  
  
<div class="row">
+
div class="row">
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Our stories</h4></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>A challenge</h4></div>
<div class="col-md-7">
+
<div class="col-md-7">
<p>Just as the journalists do, we too tell real-life people and situation stories to bring abstract ideas down to earth and make them clear. We also use stories to convey core ideas of leading thinkers, to make it possible to 'step into their shoes', 'see through their eyeglasses'. This technique helps us "stand on the shoulders of giants", as Newton did in his day, and "see further". The following taste bits will serve to introduce <em>holotopia</em> itself. (* Pls. bear with me; we may scratch them later, or achieve the same effect in some other way; but for now this is my best shot at making the main point clear. *)</p>
+
<p>[[Holotopia: Aurelio Peccei|Aurelio Peccei]]—the founding president and the motor power behind The Club of Rome—appears here in an iconic role. The Club of Rome was an effort to <em>federate</em> insights about our civilization's condition, and its future prospects. What do we <em>really</em> need to know about our situation? What do we <em>really</em> need to do to become able to handle it?</p>  
<center><b>The Noah story</b></center>
+
<p>Based on a decade of research of this international think tank, Peccei left us the following diagnosis:</p>
<p>[[Holotopia: Noah|Noah]], Dino's 10-yr old son, here appears in the role of a stakeholder. Dino's generation is on the way out; Noah's generation is on the way in. What kind of world, what options, are we leaving them?</p>
 
<p><b>Noah</b>: "Why can't I just live?"</p>
 
<p>Noah's question is his answer to Dino's attempts to help him <em>not</em> give up on understanding the world. Notice that Noah is asking exactly the question that is the point of departure of the <em>holoscope</em> and the <em>holotopia</em>, whether we should redefine our relationship with knowledge, and with the world by using the available knowledge—or just continue living as we are used to.  In the light of the above metaphorical image, Noah is asking "Why do we need to create the lightbulb? Isn't the good old candle serving us just fine?</p>
 
<p><b>Dino</b>: "While our distant ancestors were living on trees, "just living" was the only option, and it was of course also possible. They only needed to reach out their hand and pick up a banana. But that is no longer possible in the complex world we've created."</p>
 
<p><b>Noah</b>: "That's not true! We can just reach out our hand and pick up whatever we want—<em>from a supermarket shelf</em>!"</p>
 
 
 
<center><b>The Aurelio Peccei story</b></center>
 
<p>[[Holotopia: Aurelio Peccei|Aurelio Peccei]]—the founding president and the motor power behind The Club of Rome—also appears here in an iconic role. The Club of Rome was an effort to <em>federate</em> insights about our civilization's condition, and its future prospects. What do we <em>really</em> need to know about our situation? What do we <em>really</em> need to do?</p>  
 
<p>Based on a decade of research of this international think tank, Peccei left us the following diagnosis:</p>  
 
 
[[File:Peccei-Future.jpeg]]
 
[[File:Peccei-Future.jpeg]]
 
<small>We let this be a road sign on a civilizational crossroads. While most of us are "just living",  a growing number sees that this leads to a dead end—and is beginning to panic. </small>
 
<small>We let this be a road sign on a civilizational crossroads. While most of us are "just living",  a growing number sees that this leads to a dead end—and is beginning to panic. </small>
<p>We offer it here to Noah. We are living in a precarious moment where "just living" is no longer possible. And where knowledge, where our capability to understand the world and orient ourselves in it, will have a completely different function than it had before—and <em>still</em> does! </p>
+
<p>Can new 'headlights' help us "change course"? And if they can—<em>what will the new course be</em>?</p>  
<p>Peccei as an icon stands for the forgotten history of the environmental movement. The fact that we cannot just engineer "solutions" to our "problems"—such as the climate change. We must "change course". Read our [[Holotopia: Aurelio Peccei|Aurelio Peccei]] story to see what this really meant—that it's "a great cultural revival" we need to aim for! But <em>how</em>? </p>
 
<p>Can new 'headlights' help us "change course"? And if they can—<em>what will that new course be like</em>?</p>  
 
</div> </div>
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-3"></div>
 
<div class="col-md-6">
 
<p><center><b>The Margaret Mead story</b></center></p>
 
<p>[[Holotopia:Margaret Mead|Margaret Mead]] appears here in the role of an icon of the Holotopia project itself. Her familiar dictum points to the <em>holotopia</em>'s very core mission:
 
<blockquote>
 
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has."
 
</blockquote>
 
The 'small print'—her explanation (based on research in cultural anthropology, where she was a leader) what exactly has distinguished the small groups of thoughtful, committed citizens, <em>historically</em>, which were <em>capable</em> of making a difference—is even <em>more</em> relevant, because it points to the strategic and tactical decisions that define the Holotopia project. Contemplate the [[Holotopia:Margaret Mead|Margaret Mead]] story and find out the details.</p>
 
</div>
 
<div class="col-md-3 round-images">
 
[[File:Mead.jpg]]
 
 
</div> </div>  
 
</div> </div>  
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Holotopia as a vision</h4></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>A vision</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
<p>Margaret Mead wrote:
+
[[File:Elephant.jpg]]
<blockquote>"One necessary condition of successfully continuing our existence is the creation of an atmosphere of hope that the huge problems now confronting us can, in fact, be solved—and can be solved in time."
+
<small><center>There is an <em>elephant</em> in the room, ready to be seen as soon as we connect the dots. Before we saw it, we heard our leading thinkers talk about "the hoze", "the fan" and "the trunk"—but they didn't make sense, and we ignored them. The vision of the emerging <em>paradigm</em> empowers us to put good insights to good use.</center></small>
 +
<p>As a vision of a possible future, the <em>holotopia</em> is a positive answer to the question posited in the Holoscope.org's opening:
 +
<blockquote>
 +
Think about the world at the twilight of the Middle Ages and the dawn of the Renaissance: devastating religious wars, terrifying epidemics… Think of the scholastics pondering about the angels dancing on a needlepoint; and Galilei in house arrest, whispering “and yet it moves” into his beard. Observe that the problems of the epoch were not resolved by focusing on those problems, but by a slow and steady development of an entirely new approach to knowledge. Several centuries of comprehensive evolution followed. Could a similar advent be in store for us today?
 
</blockquote>  
 
</blockquote>  
The <em>holotopia</em> vision achieves that, and significantly more—it provides for an engagement where we are not "solving problems", but <em>building</em> a human condition that is radically better than what we have today.</p>
+
<p>Just as the case was in Galilei's time, a new <em>order of things</em> or technically a [[Holotopia: Paradigm|<em>paradigm</em>]] is ready to emerge.</p>  
<p>Suppose that <em>you</em> had in your hand a flashlight, which you could use to illuminate any theme or issue. What would you point it at?</p>
+
<p>The <em>holotopia</em> is <em>more</em> desirable future than the common utopias. Yet it is fully realizable. We already own the knowledge needed for its fulfillment. We only need to put it together; and put it to use.</p>
<p>We here use the <em>holoscope</em> to 'illuminate the way'. Our aim is <em>not</em> to predict the future, but to show a <em>possible</em> future. And to begin to follow a course by which this future can be reached.</p>
 
<p>The <em>holotopia</em> is <em>more</em> desirable future than the common utopias. Yet it is fully realizable. We already own all the knowledge needed for its fulfillment.</p>
 
 
</div> </div>  
 
</div> </div>  
  
Line 68: Line 50:
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>The five insights</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>The five insights</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
<p>The <em>holotopia</em> vision is made concrete in terms of specific [[Holotopia:Five insights|<em>five insights</em>]]. The idea is to show that when a core theme of interest is illuminated by the light of available knowledge—we see it in a completely new light; and in a similar way as we might see the way this theme was handled in the Middle Ages. By doing this, we give a positive answer to the question posited in the Holoscope.org's opening paragraphs:
 
<blockquote>
 
Think about the world at the twilight of the Middle Ages and the dawn of the Renaissance: devastating religious wars, terrifying epidemics… Think of the scholastics pondering about the angels dancing on a needlepoint; and Galilei in house arrest, whispering “and yet it moves” into his beard. Observe that the problems of the epoch were not resolved by focusing on those problems, but by a slow and steady development of an entirely new approach to knowledge. Several centuries of comprehensive evolution followed. Could a similar advent be in store for us today?
 
</blockquote>
 
</p>
 
 
[[File:FiveInsights.JPG]]
 
[[File:FiveInsights.JPG]]
<small>The <em>holotopia</em> vision is made concrete in terms of <em>five insights</em>.</small>
+
<center><small>The <em>holotopia</em> vision is made concrete in terms of <em>five insights</em>.</small></center>
<p>Here is how the <em>five insights</em> complete the <em>holotopia</em> vision.</p>  
+
<p>The <em>holotopia</em> vision is made concrete or <em>federated</em> in terms of [[Holotopia:Five insights|<em>five insights</em>]]:
<ul> <li>The [[Holotopia:Convenience Paradox insight|Convenience Paradox insight]] is about the pursuit of happiness. And about our general culture, and our values. The Renaissance empowered our ancestors to <em>not</em> relinquish happiness to the hereafter. Can you imagine a similar revolution <em>today</em>?</li>
+
<ul> <li>The [[Holotopia:Convenience Paradox insight|Convenience Paradox insight]] points to a revolution in "pursuit of happiness" and in culture, similar to the Renaissance</li>
<li>The [[Holotopia:Power Structure insight|Power Structure insight]] is about innovation, and about the ways in which our capability to create and induce change is directed. A timely experiment—when our best efforts resulted in problems rather than solutions. The Industrial Revolution made the human work incomparably more effective and efficient. Is it indeed true that a revolution of a similar scale is <em>still</em> just around the corner?</li>  
+
<li>The [[Holotopia:Power Structure insight|Power Structure insight]] points to a revolution in innovation, on the scale of the Industrial Revolution, by which human work will be made incomparably more effective and efficient</li>  
<li>The [[Holotopia:Collective Mind insight|Collective Mind insight]] is about communication. Some historians attributed the Enlightenment largely to Gutenberg's invention of the printing press, and the revolution of knowledge that ensued. Now we have a <em>new</em> technology—and a <em>new</em> revolution is about to take place!</li>  
+
<li>The [[Holotopia:Collective Mind insight|Collective Mind insight]] points to a revolution in communication, analogous to the advent of the printing press</p> </li>  
<li>The [[Holotopia:Socialized Reality insight|Socialized Reality insight]] is about the foundation on which the truth and the meaning are developed in our society; or about the [[Holotopia:Epistemology|<em>epistemology</em>]]. Wasn't <em>that</em> the reason why Galilei was in house arrest—his claim that when the human reason contradicts the Scriptures, it may be legitimate to give the former the benefit of our doubt! Could a similar advent be in store for us today?</li>  
+
<li>The [[Holotopia:Socialized Reality insight|Socialized Reality insight]] is about a new foundation on which the truth and the meaning are developed, and a possibility for a quantum leap in awareness, similar to the Enlightenment</li>  
<li>The [[Holotopia:Narrow Frame insight|Narrow Frame insight]] is about "the scientific worldview"; and more generally about the way in which we look at the world and explore the world, in order to comprehend it. We take off our 'eyeglasses', and we look at them. Could <em>they</em> be distorting our worldview, in some uncanny way?</li>  
+
<li>The [[Holotopia:Narrow Frame insight|Narrow Frame insight]] is about a new way to explore the reality, with similar consequences as the once that science had</li>  
</ul>  
+
</ul> </p>  
<p>You will have no difficulty noticing how these <em>five insights</em> weave together an affirmative answer to the question we posed above: The upper three show how an equivalent of the Renaissance, the Industrial Revolution and the Communication Revolution may still happen to us; the bottom two show that an Enlightenment-like change is ready to happen <em>for fundamental reasons</em>—and by bringing about a new way to think and to comprehend the world, make those three other changes possible.</p>  
 
 
</div> </div>  
 
</div> </div>  
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Holotopia as a strategy</h4></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>A strategy</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<p>While each of the <em>five insights</em> is spectacular in its own right, even more illuminating are their relationships. By exploring them, in the light of further suitable points of reference, we understand that we cannot meaningfully respond to any of them, without responding to them all. </p>  
 
<p>While each of the <em>five insights</em> is spectacular in its own right, even more illuminating are their relationships. By exploring them, in the light of further suitable points of reference, we understand that we cannot meaningfully respond to any of them, without responding to them all. </p>  
Line 110: Line 86:
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Holotopia as a project</h4></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>The initiative</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
[[File:H side.png]]
 
[[File:H side.png]]
 
<small>This paper model of a large sculpture, by Vibeke Jensen, represents the <em>holotopia</em> as an intervention into our shared space or "reality". We use it here ideographically, to point to <em>holotopia</em> as intervention into our everyday, which redefines our relationship to it.</small>  
 
<small>This paper model of a large sculpture, by Vibeke Jensen, represents the <em>holotopia</em> as an intervention into our shared space or "reality". We use it here ideographically, to point to <em>holotopia</em> as intervention into our everyday, which redefines our relationship to it.</small>  
<p>Remember the Renaissance: Isn't it the art, of Leonardo and of Michelangelo, that we tend to remember most? Holotopia is an art project; with a similar ambition. What would art need to be like, in this age, to be able to play a similarly transformative role? It is to <em>that</em> timely question that we want to most humbly contribute.</p>
+
<p>The mission of the [[Holotopia:Initiative|Holotopia initiative]] is to develop whatever is needed for "changing course" – and realizing the <em>holotopia</em>. </p>  
<p>The mission of [[Holotopia:Prototype|Holotopia as a prototype]] or project is to develop whatever is needed for "changing course" – and reaching the <em>holotopia</em>. </p>  
 
 
</div> </div>  
 
</div> </div>  
  
Line 123: Line 98:
 
[[File:Box1.jpg]]
 
[[File:Box1.jpg]]
 
<small>A paper model of The Box, by Vibeke Jensen.</small>
 
<small>A paper model of The Box, by Vibeke Jensen.</small>
<p> Holotopia's [[Holotopia:The box|box]] is a ritual object designed for 'initiation' to <em>holotopia</em>, a way to help us 'unbox' our conception of the world and see, think and behave differently; change course inwardly, by embracing a new value.</p>  
+
<p> Holotopia's [[Holotopia:The box|box]] is an object designed for 'initiation' to <em>holotopia</em>, a way to help us 'unbox' our conception of the world and see, think and behave differently; change course inwardly, by embracing a new value.</p>  
 
</div> </div>  
 
</div> </div>  
 +
 +
 +
 +
<!--  OLD STUFF
 +
 +
 +
 +
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Our stories</h4></div>
 +
<div class="col-md-7">
 +
<p>Just as the journalists do, we too tell real-life people and situation stories to bring abstract ideas down to earth and make them clear. We also use stories to convey core ideas of leading thinkers, to make it possible to 'step into their shoes', 'see through their eyeglasses'. This technique helps us "stand on the shoulders of giants", as Newton did in his day, and "see further". The following taste bits will serve to introduce <em>holotopia</em> itself. (* Pls. bear with me; we may scratch them later, or achieve the same effect in some other way; but for now this is my best shot at making the main point clear. *)</p>
 +
<center><b>The Noah story</b></center>
 +
<p>[[Holotopia: Noah|Noah]], Dino's 10-yr old son, here appears in the role of a stakeholder. Dino's generation is on the way out; Noah's generation is on the way in. What kind of world, what options, are we leaving them?</p>
 +
<p><b>Noah</b>: "Why can't I just live?"</p>
 +
<p>Noah's question is his answer to Dino's attempts to help him <em>not</em> give up on understanding the world. Notice that Noah is asking exactly the question that is the point of departure of the <em>holoscope</em> and the <em>holotopia</em>, whether we should redefine our relationship with knowledge, and with the world by using the available knowledge—or just continue living as we are used to.  In the light of the above metaphorical image, Noah is asking "Why do we need to create the lightbulb? Isn't the good old candle serving us just fine?</p>
 +
<p><b>Dino</b>: "While our distant ancestors were living on trees, "just living" was the only option, and it was of course also possible. They only needed to reach out their hand and pick up a banana. But that is no longer possible in the complex world we've created."</p>
 +
<p><b>Noah</b>: "That's not true! We can just reach out our hand and pick up whatever we want—<em>from a supermarket shelf</em>!"</p>
 +
 +
<center><b>The Aurelio Peccei story</b></center>
 +
 +
[[File:Peccei-Future.jpeg]]
 +
<small>We let this be a road sign on a civilizational crossroads. While most of us are "just living",  a growing number sees that this leads to a dead end—and is beginning to panic. </small>
 +
<p>We offer it here to Noah. We are living in a precarious moment where "just living" is no longer possible. And where knowledge, where our capability to understand the world and orient ourselves in it, will have a completely different function than it had before—and <em>still</em> does! </p>
 +
<p>Peccei as an icon stands for the forgotten history of the environmental movement. The fact that we cannot just engineer "solutions" to our "problems"—such as the climate change. We must "change course". Read our [[Holotopia: Aurelio Peccei|Aurelio Peccei]] story to see what this really meant—that it's "a great cultural revival" we need to aim for! But <em>how</em>? </p>
 +
 +
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"></div>
 +
<div class="col-md-6">
 +
<p><center><b>The Margaret Mead story</b></center></p>
 +
<p>[[Holotopia:Margaret Mead|Margaret Mead]] appears here in the role of an icon of the Holotopia project itself. Her familiar dictum points to the <em>holotopia</em>'s very core mission:
 +
<blockquote>
 +
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has."
 +
</blockquote>
 +
The 'small print'—her explanation (based on research in cultural anthropology, where she was a leader) what exactly has distinguished the small groups of thoughtful, committed citizens, <em>historically</em>, which were <em>capable</em> of making a difference—is even <em>more</em> relevant, because it points to the strategic and tactical decisions that define the Holotopia project. Contemplate the [[Holotopia:Margaret Mead|Margaret Mead]] story and find out the details.</p>
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="col-md-3 round-images">
 +
[[File:Mead.jpg]]
 +
</div> </div>
 +
 +
 +
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>The five insights</h4></div>
 +
<div class="col-md-7">
 +
<p>The <em>holotopia</em> vision is made concrete in terms of specific [[Holotopia:Five insights|<em>five insights</em>]]. The idea is to show that when a core theme of interest is illuminated by the light of available knowledge—we see it in a completely new light; and in a similar way as we might see the way this theme was handled in the Middle Ages.
 +
</p>
 +
[[File:FiveInsights.JPG]]
 +
<small>The <em>holotopia</em> vision is made concrete in terms of <em>five insights</em>.</small>
 +
<p>Here is how the <em>five insights</em> complete the <em>holotopia</em> vision.</p>
 +
<ul> <li>The [[Holotopia:Convenience Paradox insight|Convenience Paradox insight]] is about the pursuit of happiness. And about our general culture, and our values. The Renaissance empowered our ancestors to <em>not</em> relinquish happiness to the hereafter. Can you imagine a similar revolution <em>today</em>?</li>
 +
<li>The [[Holotopia:Power Structure insight|Power Structure insight]] is about innovation, and about the ways in which our capability to create and induce change is directed. A timely experiment—when our best efforts resulted in problems rather than solutions. The Industrial Revolution made the human work incomparably more effective and efficient. Is it indeed true that a revolution of a similar scale is <em>still</em> just around the corner?</li>
 +
<li>The [[Holotopia:Collective Mind insight|Collective Mind insight]] is about communication. Some historians attributed the Enlightenment largely to Gutenberg's invention of the printing press, and the revolution of knowledge that ensued. Now we have a <em>new</em> technology—and a <em>new</em> revolution is about to take place!</li>
 +
<li>The [[Holotopia:Socialized Reality insight|Socialized Reality insight]] is about the foundation on which the truth and the meaning are developed in our society; or about the [[Holotopia:Epistemology|<em>epistemology</em>]]. Wasn't <em>that</em> the reason why Galilei was in house arrest—his claim that when the human reason contradicts the Scriptures, it may be legitimate to give the former the benefit of our doubt! Could a similar advent be in store for us today?</li>
 +
<li>The [[Holotopia:Narrow Frame insight|Narrow Frame insight]] is about "the scientific worldview"; and more generally about the way in which we look at the world and explore the world, in order to comprehend it. We take off our 'eyeglasses', and we look at them. Could <em>they</em> be distorting our worldview, in some uncanny way?</li>
 +
</ul>
 +
<p>You will have no difficulty noticing how these <em>five insights</em> weave together an affirmative answer to the question we posed above: The upper three show how an equivalent of the Renaissance, the Industrial Revolution and the Communication Revolution may still happen to us; the bottom two show that an Enlightenment-like change is ready to happen <em>for fundamental reasons</em>—and by bringing about a new way to think and to comprehend the world, make those three other changes possible.</p>
 +
</div> </div>
 +
 +
 +
  
  
Line 136: Line 170:
 
</div> </div>  
 
</div> </div>  
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>The keywords</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<p>Just as science did at the point of its arrival, the <em>holotopia</em> brings along a collection of  [[Holotopia:Keywords|keywords]] which engender a new way of seeing and speaking.</p>
 
<p>An example is the [[Holotopia:Power structure|power structure]] keyword—which represents a completely new notion of the political enemy. Rearranges completely our political and ethical sensibilities.</p>
 
<p>Another good example is the [[Holotopia:Homo ludens|homo ludens]] keyword—which depicts the <em>course</em> we've taken in evolution. In the light of these two concepts, Holotopia may be seen as a way to liberate ourselves from the <em>power structure</em> (in the name of justice, democracy...). <em>Or</em> as a way to make the <em>next</em> evolutionary leap—by leaving the <em>homo ludens</em> evolutionary track, and becoming (also culturally) the <em>homo sapiens</em>.
 
</div> </div>
 
  
  
Line 175: Line 201:
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>The project</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>The project</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 +
 +
<p>Margaret Mead wrote:
 +
<blockquote>"One necessary condition of successfully continuing our existence is the creation of an atmosphere of hope that the huge problems now confronting us can, in fact, be solved—and can be solved in time."
 +
</blockquote>

Revision as of 16:35, 17 March 2020

div class="row">

Background

Modernity.jpg By depicting our civilization as a bus, and our still traditional way of handling information and knowledge as its candle headlights, the Modernity ideogram renders our contemporary condition in a nutshell—and suggests what is to be done.

We have developed and proposed knowledge federation as a new approach to knowledge, or technically a paradigm. In knowledge federation, information and knowledge are considered as created by people for people, to fulfill all those essential purposes that information and knowledge need to fulfill; notably to provide us suitable "know-what" or orientation, in the complex reality we've created.

</div>

Seeing things whole

File:Holoscope.jpg

We here refer to the proposed approach to knowledge by its pseudonym holoscope, to points to its distinguishing characteristic—namely that it allows us to combine disparate pieces of information together, and show a theme or an issue from all sides. So that we may see it as a whole.

Science gave us new ways to look at the world, and our vision expanded beyond bounds. The telescope and the microscope enabled us to see the things that were too distant or too small to be seen by the naked eye. At the same time, science had the tendency to keep us focused on things that were either too distant or too small to be relevant – compared to all those big things right in front of our eyes, which now demand our attention. The holoscope is conceived as way to look at the world that helps us see any chosen thing or theme as a whole – from all sides; and in correct proportions.

Perspective-S.jpg A purpose of the holoscope is to illuminate what has remained hidden, so that we may see the whole in correct shape and proportions.

A complete model (or technically a prototype) of the holoscope having been described on Holoscope.org, and explained in a variety of ways on Holoscope.info, it remains to provide a proof of concept application. We present the holotopia as an answer to the question "What difference might the holoscope make?"

div class="row">

A challenge

Aurelio Peccei—the founding president and the motor power behind The Club of Rome—appears here in an iconic role. The Club of Rome was an effort to federate insights about our civilization's condition, and its future prospects. What do we really need to know about our situation? What do we really need to do to become able to handle it?

Based on a decade of research of this international think tank, Peccei left us the following diagnosis:

Peccei-Future.jpeg We let this be a road sign on a civilizational crossroads. While most of us are "just living", a growing number sees that this leads to a dead end—and is beginning to panic.

Can new 'headlights' help us "change course"? And if they can—what will the new course be?

</div>

A vision

Elephant.jpg

There is an elephant in the room, ready to be seen as soon as we connect the dots. Before we saw it, we heard our leading thinkers talk about "the hoze", "the fan" and "the trunk"—but they didn't make sense, and we ignored them. The vision of the emerging paradigm empowers us to put good insights to good use.

As a vision of a possible future, the holotopia is a positive answer to the question posited in the Holoscope.org's opening:

Think about the world at the twilight of the Middle Ages and the dawn of the Renaissance: devastating religious wars, terrifying epidemics… Think of the scholastics pondering about the angels dancing on a needlepoint; and Galilei in house arrest, whispering “and yet it moves” into his beard. Observe that the problems of the epoch were not resolved by focusing on those problems, but by a slow and steady development of an entirely new approach to knowledge. Several centuries of comprehensive evolution followed. Could a similar advent be in store for us today?

<p>Just as the case was in Galilei's time, a new order of things or technically a paradigm is ready to emerge.

The holotopia is more desirable future than the common utopias. Yet it is fully realizable. We already own the knowledge needed for its fulfillment. We only need to put it together; and put it to use.

The five insights

FiveInsights.JPG

The holotopia vision is made concrete in terms of five insights.

The holotopia vision is made concrete or federated in terms of five insights:

  • The Convenience Paradox insight points to a revolution in "pursuit of happiness" and in culture, similar to the Renaissance
  • The Power Structure insight points to a revolution in innovation, on the scale of the Industrial Revolution, by which human work will be made incomparably more effective and efficient
  • The Collective Mind insight points to a revolution in communication, analogous to the advent of the printing press</p>
  • The Socialized Reality insight is about a new foundation on which the truth and the meaning are developed, and a possibility for a quantum leap in awareness, similar to the Enlightenment
  • The Narrow Frame insight is about a new way to explore the reality, with similar consequences as the once that science had
  • </ul>

A strategy

While each of the five insights is spectacular in its own right, even more illuminating are their relationships. By exploring them, in the light of further suitable points of reference, we understand that we cannot meaningfully respond to any of them, without responding to them all.

An even larger, overarching insight results, which naturally leads to the strategy that the holotopia is pointing to by its very name:

Comprehensive change can be easy, even when much smaller and obviously necessary changes may be impossible.


Making things whole

We were able to federate the five insights even further. Each of the five larger-than-life opportunities to improve our condition, which the five insights are pointing to, can be fulfilled by following this simple rule of thumb: Instead of seeing the world in the light of our narrowly conceived self-interest, and trusting that "the free competition" or "the invisible hand" of the market will turn our self-serving acts into the greatest common good (which is so markedly Middle Ages, isn't it?)—we see ourselves and what we do as parts in a larger whole or wholes; and act in ways that make all those larger wholes more whole.

Hence this formula (Vibeke didn't like it, but hey—nobody's reading this yet, so let's have it here as Dino's private joke and foible):

But seek ye first the systemic wholeness,
in all matters and on all levels of detail; 
and all these things shall be added unto you.

The initiative

H side.png This paper model of a large sculpture, by Vibeke Jensen, represents the holotopia as an intervention into our shared space or "reality". We use it here ideographically, to point to holotopia as intervention into our everyday, which redefines our relationship to it.

The mission of the Holotopia initiative is to develop whatever is needed for "changing course" – and realizing the holotopia.

The box

Box1.jpg A paper model of The Box, by Vibeke Jensen.

Holotopia's box is an object designed for 'initiation' to holotopia, a way to help us 'unbox' our conception of the world and see, think and behave differently; change course inwardly, by embracing a new value.