Difference between revisions of "Holotopia: Collective Mind"

From Knowledge Federation
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
 
Line 18: Line 18:
 
What is at issue here is the way in which all that fancy technology has been used. More precisely—the very principle of operation of our 'collective minds', which this technology has enabled us to create, by connecting us together in a new way. Is it still using 'fire' (the way of functioning that the printing press as technology made possible); or does it take due advantage of the <em>specific</em> advantages that the new technology has to offer?
 
What is at issue here is the way in which all that fancy technology has been used. More precisely—the very principle of operation of our 'collective minds', which this technology has enabled us to create, by connecting us together in a new way. Is it still using 'fire' (the way of functioning that the printing press as technology made possible); or does it take due advantage of the <em>specific</em> advantages that the new technology has to offer?
 
</p>  
 
</p>  
 +
<p>In essence, the network-interconnected interactive digital media have connected us all together in a similar way as the nervous system connects together the cells in an organism. We look at the process which we use, as cells, to process the knowledge together. How does our <em>collective mind</em>  work?</p>
 
</div> </div>
 
</div> </div>
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>View</h2></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<p>
 
Text
 
</p>
 
</div> </div>
 
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
Line 39: Line 32:
  
  
<div class="page-header" ><h2>Federating the TITLE</h2></div>
+
<div class="page-header" ><h2>Federating the <em>collective mind</em></h2></div>
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
Line 54: Line 47:
 
<small>Douglas Engelbart</small>  
 
<small>Douglas Engelbart</small>  
 
</div></div>
 
</div></div>
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-3"></div>
 
<div class="col-md-6">
 
 
<h3>Story 2</h3>
 
 
<p>Text</p>
 
</div>
 
 
<div class="col-md-3">
 
I M A G E<br>
 
<small>Caption</small>
 
</div></div>
 
 
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
Line 74: Line 52:
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
  
<h3>Action 1</h3>  
+
<h3>Adding <em>bootstrapping</em> to the repertoire of <em>academia</em></h3>  
 
   
 
   
<p>Text</p>
+
<p>That's the essence of what Engelbart was asking for, of his call to action.</p>
</div> </div>
+
<p>That's of course also what our proposal, to institutionalize and develop <em>knowledge federation</em> as an academic field is about.</p>
 +
<p>Our <em>prototype</em> shows how.</p>  
  
<div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-3"></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
  
 
+
<h3>Creating knowledge-work systems that <em>federate</em> knowledge</h3>  
<h3>Action 2</h3>  
 
 
   
 
   
<p>Text</p>
+
<p>Our <em>prototypes</em> show how.</p>
 
</div> </div>
 
</div> </div>
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>Myths and Errors</h2></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<p>This may be omitted</p>
 
<h3>"Interesting" means "relevant"</h3>
 
<p>The myth (analogous to the myth of convenience) that we can relegate the choice of information to what <em>feels</em> interesting or attractive to people. And sidetracking <em>the</em> key question—<em>what should information be like, and how should it be used</em> so that our society, and our democracy, may function.</p>
 
 
<h3>"Published" means "known"</h3>
 
<p>The myth that when something is "published" (by broadcasting), it is automatically "known". </p>
 
<p>And the closely related myth that the book and the article are <em>the</em> information structuring formats.</p>
 
<p>Of course, <em>both</em> errors we've simply adopted from the <em>traditional</em> culture—without noticing that the new technology not only enables, but also requires a <em>thorough</em> re-design.</p>
 
<p>What keeps the contemporary 'Galilei in house arrest' is that (1) his ideas are confined to speculations, imprisoned in an inaccessible language in some inaccessible publication, and (2) lost in the "information jungle".</p>
 
</div> </div>
 
 
 
<h3>Back to [[Holotopia:Five insights|Five insights]]</h3>
 
<h3>Back to [[Holotopia:Five insights|Five insights]]</h3>
 
<!--
 
 
 
<div class="page-header" ><h1>Holotopia: The Collective Mind insight</h1></div>
 
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Scope</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<p>There can be no doubt that the printing press, and the improvement of communication and of the spreading of knowledge it enabled, contributed to the Enlightenment. Some historians even consider Gutenberg's invention as its <em>main</em> cause. What might have a similar effect today?</p>
 
<p>The Inernet has just recently been developed; and it has <em>already</em> changed our lives beyond recognition. Isn't that <em>already</em> the answer to our quest?</p>
 
<p>In effect, the network-interconnected interactive digital media have connected us all together in a similar way as the nervous system connects together the cells in an organism. We look at the process which we use, as cells, to process the knowledge together. How does our <em>collective mind</em>  work?</p>
 
</div> </div>
 
 
 
 
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Federation</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<p>
 
Knowledge Work Has a Flat Tire, and other evangelizing prototypes.
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
Bush–Engelbart–Postman
 
</p>
 
</div> </div>
 
 
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Action</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<p>
 
Develop a collective mind that <em>federates</em> knowledge. Where every cell gets the data it needs to be able to operate on. Develop a <em>functioning</em> collective mind.</p>
 
<p>Generally—the solution is <em>systemic innovation</em> in knowledge work; handling information in ways that make systems more <em>whole</em>. A basic point here is that this is a natural <em>first</em> step in <em>systemic innovation</em>—we first need suitable light, before we can see what else needs to be done.
 
</p>
 
</div> </div>
 
 
* Back to [[Holotopia]]
 

Latest revision as of 11:20, 15 April 2020

H O L O T O P I A    P R O T O T Y P E



Pitch

The Internet, the interactive media technology... Isn't that's the most modern part of our civilization? Isn't that what we are most proud of? We are not comparing that with a pair of handles?


Scope

What is at issue here is the way in which all that fancy technology has been used. More precisely—the very principle of operation of our 'collective minds', which this technology has enabled us to create, by connecting us together in a new way. Is it still using 'fire' (the way of functioning that the printing press as technology made possible); or does it take due advantage of the specific advantages that the new technology has to offer?

In essence, the network-interconnected interactive digital media have connected us all together in a similar way as the nervous system connects together the cells in an organism. We look at the process which we use, as cells, to process the knowledge together. How does our collective mind work?

Insight

KFvision.jpeg Our civilization is like an overgrown organism, so poorly coordinated that it presents a danger to its environment, and to itself. It has recently acquired a nervous system, which could help its organs coordinate their action; but its cells have not yet learned how to use it.

Without thinking, we've adopted broadcasting (which suited the old technology) to be the way. But broadcasting leads to collective insanity—not to collective intelligence, as it was intended.


Stories

V. Bush – Engelbart

The network-interconnected interactive digital media technology, which is in common use today, was created to serve as a collective mind of a new kind—and provide us with the collective capabilities we are now lacking, to be able to tackle our increasingly complex and urgent problems.

We used this technology to only broadcast information!

Engelbart.jpg
Douglas Engelbart

Actions

Adding bootstrapping to the repertoire of academia

That's the essence of what Engelbart was asking for, of his call to action.

That's of course also what our proposal, to institutionalize and develop knowledge federation as an academic field is about.

Our prototype shows how.


Creating knowledge-work systems that federate knowledge

Our prototypes show how.

Back to Five insights