Difference between revisions of "STORIES"

From Knowledge Federation
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<div class="page-header" > <h1>Federation through Stories</h1> </div>
 
<div class="page-header" > <h1>Federation through Stories</h1> </div>
 +
 +
<!-- TEMPLATE 1
 +
 +
<div class="row">
 +
  <div class="col-md-3"><h4>Ingress</h4></div>
 +
 +
<div class="col-md-9"><p>Text</p></div>
 +
</div>
 +
 +
 +
** END OF T1 -->
 +
 +
 +
 +
<!-- TEMPLATE 2
 +
 +
<div class="row">
 +
  <div class="col-md-3"><h4>Ingress.</h4></div>
 +
 +
<div class="col-md-6"><p>Text</p></div>
 +
 +
<div class="col-md-3 round-images">[[File:Picture.jpg]]<br><small><center>Caption</center></small></div>
 +
 +
</div>
 +
 +
 +
** END OF T2 -->
 +
 +
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
Line 7: Line 36:
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
----
+
-----
 +
 
 +
<div class="row">
 +
  <div class="col-md-3"><h4>Our story here is about he next Industrial Revolution.</h4></div>
 +
 
 +
<div class="col-md-9"><p>We will, however, not be telling about any [[giants|<em>giants</em>]]. We are here taking up the theme of the second book of Knowledge Federation Trilogy (with title "Systemic Innovation", and  subtitle "Democracy for the Third Millennium". Our theme of focus will be the invention and innovation side of the emerging paradigm. Here we are talking about this other side of using human creativity. So think about the printing press. Or about the steam engine. Those inventions initiated whole streams of development that made the human work wonderfully more efficient and effective.</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>Can you imagine a similar development taking place today? What might be the ideas, and who might be the people carrying them? What new forms might invention be able to take?</p></div>
 +
</div>
 +
 
 +
<div class="row">
 +
  <div class="col-md-3"><h4>So what might be the next-paradigm counterpart to the printing press?</h4></div>
 +
 
 +
<div class="col-md-9"><p>Well, you'll be inclined to say, the answer is obvious, of course, it's the Web. And if the Web truly is the answer, then we already have it, and there is not much more that can happen. But there's a catch – and that's what we're about to point to. It is exactly by focusing on the difference of the Web that is, and of "the Web that wasn't" (as Alex Wright put it), that the future of not only the Web but also of innovation will be understood.</p></div>
 +
</div>
 +
 
 +
-----
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<div class="row">
 +
  <div class="col-md-3"><h4>The Internet has.. But we also need to think in a new way.</h4></div>
 +
 
 +
<div class="col-md-6"><p>The hero we want to begin with is an icon of KF.  Silicon Valley's genius in residence - not understood!</p>
 +
<p>The story we want to tell is also iconic. The slides are of Doug's presentation at Google – Call to Action. NOT shown!</p>
 +
 
 +
<p> So here it is, in a nutshell: In 1951 Doug decided. Then he had an epiphany.</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>What is it that he saw?</p></div>
 +
 
 +
<div class="col-md-3 round-images">[[File:Doug.jpg]]<br><small><center>[[Douglas Engelbart]]</center></small></div>
 +
 
 +
</div>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<div class="row">
 +
  <div class="col-md-3"><h4>Many years ago I dreamed that...</h4></div>
 +
 
 +
<div class="col-md-9"><p>Doug was celebrated as a brilliant creator of TECHNOLOGY. But really we'll introduce him here as a brilliant creator of IDEAS – which so much didn't fit into the existing academic and entrepreneurial paradigm that they not only failed to find their place at the university, but they are STILL TODAY ignored. We'll talk here about only two. The first one is what Doug called CoDIAK.  The point is – this technology is a QUANTUM LEAP!!! The printing press wasn't – it's just an effectivization of what the scribes were doing in monasteries, while copying manuscripts!</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>But what Doug foresaw (already in 1951 - and then immediately dedicated his career to fulfilling that vision) was that when digital computer technology is interconnected into a network – COMPLETELY NEW PATTERNS OF INTERACTION and SYSTEMIC SOLUTIONS become possible! We can in effect THINK TOGETHER – like cells collected together into a collective mind. </p>
 +
 
 +
<p>Now the second idea. We'll call it [[systemic innovation|<em>systemic innovation</em>]]. To properly understand it (in our NARROWER context, of innovating in knowledge work), start from Doug's approach to SI which he called "augmentation". It's all about improving the human capabilities. The CoDIAK is a capability. But to really take advantage of it, still another one needs to be in place. Doug tried his best to point to it by his keyword BOOTSTRAPPING, and we'll come back to that. </p>
 +
 
 +
<p>The point is that we haven't yet learned to update our systems. Indeed our systems are not CONSTRUCTED to have the capability to update themselves!</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>On the contrary – as we shall see, our systems ARE our reality! And therein resides our main challenge!</p></div>
 +
</div>
 +
 
 +
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 +
 
 +
<div class="row">
 +
  <div class="col-md-2"><h2>See</h2></div>
 +
  <div class="col-md-1"><big>&diams;</big></div>
 +
 
 +
<div class="col-md-9">
 +
[[IMAGES|Federation through Images]], where ... TEXT</div>
 +
</div>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<!-- OLD STUFF
 +
 
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
Line 122: Line 211:
 
<div class="col-md-9"><p>The point of transformation, the transition, is bootstrapping. We step into the new paradigm, we become part of the solution, when we "see ourselves in the world" – and begin to bootstrap new systems. Notice that this is a profound change of ethics – and it has to be that! We are no longer career game players. We BOOTSTRAP, we play The Game-Changing Game. </p></div>
 
<div class="col-md-9"><p>The point of transformation, the transition, is bootstrapping. We step into the new paradigm, we become part of the solution, when we "see ourselves in the world" – and begin to bootstrap new systems. Notice that this is a profound change of ethics – and it has to be that! We are no longer career game players. We BOOTSTRAP, we play The Game-Changing Game. </p></div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<!--
 
  
  
Line 129: Line 216:
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
-----
+
*** END OF OLD STUFF -->
 
 
<div class="row">
 
  <div class="col-md-2"><h2>See</h2></div>
 
  <div class="col-md-1"><big>&diams;</big></div>
 
 
 
  <div class="col-md-9">
 
[[IMAGES|Federation through Images]], where ... TEXT</div>
 
</div>
 
 
 
-->
 

Revision as of 11:31, 1 August 2018




How does one lift up an insight of a giant out of undeserved anonymity?

We tell vignettes – engaging, lively, catchy, sticky... real-life people and situation stories, to distill core ideas of daring thinkers and make them accessible. By joining vignettes into threads, and threads into patterns, we combine insights across fields of interest and reach general insights that are vital to us all.


Our story here is about he next Industrial Revolution.

We will, however, not be telling about any giants. We are here taking up the theme of the second book of Knowledge Federation Trilogy (with title "Systemic Innovation", and subtitle "Democracy for the Third Millennium". Our theme of focus will be the invention and innovation side of the emerging paradigm. Here we are talking about this other side of using human creativity. So think about the printing press. Or about the steam engine. Those inventions initiated whole streams of development that made the human work wonderfully more efficient and effective.

Can you imagine a similar development taking place today? What might be the ideas, and who might be the people carrying them? What new forms might invention be able to take?

So what might be the next-paradigm counterpart to the printing press?

Well, you'll be inclined to say, the answer is obvious, of course, it's the Web. And if the Web truly is the answer, then we already have it, and there is not much more that can happen. But there's a catch – and that's what we're about to point to. It is exactly by focusing on the difference of the Web that is, and of "the Web that wasn't" (as Alex Wright put it), that the future of not only the Web but also of innovation will be understood.



The Internet has.. But we also need to think in a new way.

The hero we want to begin with is an icon of KF. Silicon Valley's genius in residence - not understood!

The story we want to tell is also iconic. The slides are of Doug's presentation at Google – Call to Action. NOT shown!

So here it is, in a nutshell: In 1951 Doug decided. Then he had an epiphany.

What is it that he saw?


Many years ago I dreamed that...

Doug was celebrated as a brilliant creator of TECHNOLOGY. But really we'll introduce him here as a brilliant creator of IDEAS – which so much didn't fit into the existing academic and entrepreneurial paradigm that they not only failed to find their place at the university, but they are STILL TODAY ignored. We'll talk here about only two. The first one is what Doug called CoDIAK. The point is – this technology is a QUANTUM LEAP!!! The printing press wasn't – it's just an effectivization of what the scribes were doing in monasteries, while copying manuscripts!

But what Doug foresaw (already in 1951 - and then immediately dedicated his career to fulfilling that vision) was that when digital computer technology is interconnected into a network – COMPLETELY NEW PATTERNS OF INTERACTION and SYSTEMIC SOLUTIONS become possible! We can in effect THINK TOGETHER – like cells collected together into a collective mind.

Now the second idea. We'll call it systemic innovation. To properly understand it (in our NARROWER context, of innovating in knowledge work), start from Doug's approach to SI which he called "augmentation". It's all about improving the human capabilities. The CoDIAK is a capability. But to really take advantage of it, still another one needs to be in place. Doug tried his best to point to it by his keyword BOOTSTRAPPING, and we'll come back to that.

The point is that we haven't yet learned to update our systems. Indeed our systems are not CONSTRUCTED to have the capability to update themselves!

On the contrary – as we shall see, our systems ARE our reality! And therein resides our main challenge!


See

Federation through Images, where ... TEXT