Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From Knowledge Federation
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
−
  <div class="col-md-3"><h4>– If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.</h4></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>Imagine</h2></div>
−
   <div class="col-md-6"><p>"If I have seen further," Sir Isaac Newton famously declared, "it is by standing on the shoulders of giants." Imagine if we would lose this all-important ability, to take advantage of the best ideas of our best minds: What sort of problems, and what situation would result? Imagine if we would then regain it: What opportunities would that open up?</p>
+
<div class="col-md-7"><h3>Introducing knowledge federation</h3>
 +
<p>To understand the meaning and purpose of [[knowledge federation|<em>knowledge federation</em>]], it may be best to recall humanity's condition at the eve of the Middle Ages: ravaging wars, horrifying epidemics, infamous inquisition trials... Bring to mind the iconic image of Galilei in house prison, a century after Copernicus, whispering "eppur si muove" into his beard. The problems of the day were not resolved by focusing on those problems, but by a slow development of a whole new approach to knowledge. Several centuries of unprecedented progress followed. Could it be similar today?</p>
 +
 
 +
<div class="row">
 +
  <div class="col-md-3"></div>
 +
   <div class="col-md-6"><h3>Our purpose is to 'connect the dots'<p>"If I have seen further," Sir Isaac Newton famously declared, "it is by standing on the shoulders of giants." Imagine if we would lose this all-important ability, to take advantage of the best ideas of our best minds: What sort of problems, and what situation would result? Imagine if we would then regain it: What opportunities would that open up?</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
   <div class="col-md-3 round-images"> [[File:Newton.jpg]] <br><small><center>[[Isaac Newton]]</center></small></div>
 
   <div class="col-md-3 round-images"> [[File:Newton.jpg]] <br><small><center>[[Isaac Newton]]</center></small></div>
Line 7: Line 12:
  
 
-----
 
-----
−
 
−
<div class="row">
 
−
  <div class="col-md-3"><h4>– The summation of human experience is being expanded at a prodigious rate, and the means we use for threading through the consequent maze to the momentarily important item is the same as was used in the days of square-rigged ships.</h4></div>
 
−
 
−
  <div class="col-md-6"><p>In [[Knowledge Federation]] we have made a discovery. We did not discover that the best insights of our best minds were drowning in an ocean of glut. The visionary thinkers who inspired us to begin Knowledge Federation reached that conclusion long ago, and urged the scientists to find a remedy. But needless to say, their insights too drowned in an ocean of glut, and remained without effect. The result is, as Neil Postman observed, that we are living in a culture that is using its vast and increasingly powerful technological and human and other resources to only mass-produce and <em>broadcast</em> information. </p>
 
−
</div>
 
−
 
−
  <div class="col-md-3 round-images"> [[File:Vannevar_Bush.jpeg]] <br><small><center>[[Vannevar Bush]]</center></small></div>
 
−
</div>
 
−
 
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
−
  <div class="col-md-3"><h4>– The future will either be an inspired product of a great cultural revival, or there will be no future.</h4></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>A New Approach to Knowledge</h2></div>
 +
<div class="col-md-7"><h3>A discovery</h3>
 +
<p>In [[Knowledge Federation]] we have made a discovery. We did not discover that the best insights of our best minds were drowning in an ocean of glut. The 20th century's giants reached that conclusion, and urged the scientists to find a remedy. But needless to say, that too drowned in an ocean of glut.</p>
  
−
  <div class="col-md-6"><p>What we <em>did</em> find out (when we began to develop and apply the remedial <em>praxis</em> we are calling [[knowledge federation]]) was that now, just as in Newton's time, when we 'stand on the shoulders of giants' we see the world differently. When we 'connected the dots' – i.e. when we combined the relevant insights across the boundaries of academic disciplines and fields of interest and traditions, the result was radically different answers to core questions including the nature of truth and meaning, in what way might happiness be successfully pursued, what still impedes our freedom and democracy, and what technological innovation may need to be like to benefit us far more than it currently does. We also found out that those emerging new ways of conceiving human and societal realities are not just random departures from our habitual ones, but that they form a coherent system of ideas or [[paradigm]].
+
<p>What we <em>did</em> find out, when we began to put the insights of giants together,  was that just as the case was in Newton's time, a new approach to knowledge is ready to be born. And that this new approach to knowledge leads to new answers to core questions – including the nature of truth and meaning, in what way might happiness be successfully pursued, what still impedes our freedom and democracy, and what technological innovation may need to be like to benefit us far more than it currently does. </p> </div>
−
</p>
 
−
<p>We found out, in other words, that we already own the knowledge needed to ignite a change reminiscent of the Enlightenment and the Renaissance, or “a great cultural revival”, which a [[giants|giant]] identified as necessary in our condition. What is missing is the will and the ability to [[knowledge federation|federate]] that knowledge – identify the relevant pieces, make them comprehensible, combine them together, and secure that they are acted on.</p> </div>
 
  
−
<div class="col-md-3 round-images"> [[File:Peccei.jpg]] <br><small><center>[[Aurelio Peccei]]</center></small></div>
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
−
-----
 
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
−
  <div class="col-md-3"><h4>– To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.</h4></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>Our Initiative</h2></div>
 +
<div class="col-md-6"><h3>We want to make a difference</h3>
 +
<p>“You never change things by fighting the existing reality", observed Buckminster Fuller. "To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”</p>
  
−
  <div class="col-md-6"><p>“You never change things by fighting the existing reality", observed Buckminster Fuller. "To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”</p>
+
<p>The issue that is being proactively problematized on these pages is the way we handle a most precious resource – human creativity (or insight, ingenuity, capacity to envision and induce change...) and its fruits accumulated through the ages – at the moment in our history where we may need to depend on it more than we ever did.</p>
  
−
<p>
+
<p>We have undertaken to make a difference by <em>igniting</em> or as we call it [[bootstrapping|<em>bootstrapping</em>]] a whole new course of action. What you'll find on these pages is a complete "new model", or as we like to call it a [[prototypes|<em>prototype</em>]], of a whole new approach to knowledge – which touches upon a spectrum of relevant issues ranging from epistemology and methods to social organization of knowledge work and technology. Our [[prototypes|<em>prototype</em>]] includes even a deployment strategy – which is already being put into use, as you are reading these pages.</p></div>
−
The issue that is being proactively problematized on these pages is the way we handle a most precious resource – human creativity (or insight, ingenuity, capacity to envision and induce change...) and its fruits accumulated through the ages – at the moment in our history where we may need to depend on it more than we ever did.</p>
 
−
 
 
−
<p>Considering the uncommon importance of this issue, we have done an as thorough job as we were able building and documenting "a new model" and paving the way for its practical and wide-scale deployment. That is what is documented on these pages. But before we begin to explore its details, let us make sure that the exact nature of our proposal is made clear.</p></div>
 
  
 
  <div class="col-md-3 round-images"> [[File:Fuller.jpg]] <br><small><center>[[R. Buckminster Fuller]]</center></small></div>
 
  <div class="col-md-3 round-images"> [[File:Fuller.jpg]] <br><small><center>[[R. Buckminster Fuller]]</center></small></div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
−
-----
 
−
 
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
−
  <div class="col-md-3"><h4>Our goal is to add a new capability to our knowledge work's and more generally creative work's repertoire – the capability to recreate itself.</h4></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>Imagine</h2></div>
−
 
+
<div class="col-md-7"><h3>Federation through Images</h3>
−
  <div class="col-md-9"><p>When we talk about an academic new [[paradigm|<em>paradigm</em>]] or about a new [[paradigm|<em>paradigm</em>]] in knowledge work in general, we are not implying that we should replace the currently dominant one. Our proposal is to add something to the academic scheme of things that is necessary for giving the insights and results that are being created, or have been created, visibility and impact. We are talking about putting good knowledge 'into the driver's seat', so to speak. As Thomas Kuhn observed, paradigms tend to be "incommensurable" – they are different ways of conceiving a field of interest, so that each is more suitable for its own specific purpose or purposes than others. The paradigm we are talking about is in our handling of information and knowledge at large. The purpose it is intended to serve is making knowledge radically better used and more useful, or "making knowledge count". </p>
+
<p>Our ideas about what constitutes "good" knowledge and "good" information evolved since antiquity, and now find their foremost expression in science and philosophy. We show that the state of the art in science and philosophy ''requires'' that we change our inherited values, and that we update the practices that grew upon them. We render the core ideas in this traditionally abstract field as metaphorical and often  paradoxical images called [[ideograms]]. The result is a cartoon-like introduction to the philosophical underpinnings of a refreshingly new approach to knowledge.
−
 
 
−
<p>Similarly when we talk about an alternative strategy for handling the contemporary issues, the [[paradigm strategy|<em>paradigm strategy</em>]] as we are calling it, we are not proposing to replace the excellent and necessary efforts that are being made to understand and handle the specific problems such as the climate change, or poverty, or to reach the millennium goals. The <em>paradigm strategy</em> is intended to on the one hand radically increase the prospect of success of those most worthwhile efforts; and on the other hand to make them (permit us to say) more solid – by adding the necessary fundamental and structural updates and upgrades, so that our efforts to build a viable future for our civilization and our children do not depend on those yesterday's ways of thinking and working that are manifestly ill-conceived or obsolete.</p>
 
−
 
 
−
<p>
 
−
And finally and most importantly, by calling knowledge federation a [[prototype|<em>prototype</em>]] (of a [[paradigm|<em>paradigm</em>]] in knowledge work), and by conceiving each of its constituent elements including this presentation as prototypes, we undertake to make it clear that our ambition is not to offer a solution, but something far more humble and at the same time far larger and more important than that – namely to engender a <em>process</em> by which our knowledge work and all its constituent elements will become the subjects, and the objects, of knowledge work. And of continued evolution – and if the need may be also re-creation.
 
−
</p>
 
  
−
<p>By developing and showcasing [[knowledge federation]] we undertake to:
+
<h3>Federation through Stories</h3>
−
<ul>
 
−
<li>Demonstrate beyond reasonable doubt that a new [[paradigm|<em>paradigm</em>]] in knowledge work is both necessary and possible</li>
 
−
<li>Streamline the co-creation, real-life deployment and scaling, and continued evolution of such an alternatives</li>
 
−
</ul>
 
−
In each of the first three main modules of this website we illuminate the [[knowledge federation|<em>knowledge federation</em>]] model from a specific angle. In each of them we demonstrate a different set of knowledge federation techniques by applying them to that purpose. In the fourth, [[Federation through Conversations|Conversations]], we orchestrate the [[knowledge federation|<em>federation</em>]] of knowledge federation itself – by initiating a two-way communication where our current proposal is on the one hand understood and on the other hand continuously updated by new ideas and insights, through the agency of our "collective intelligence"; and which on the other hand <em>builds</em> a new way to communicate and a new public sphere, making us radically more "collectively intelligent", and capable of taking up the kind of issues we are raising and of course all others, and bringing them to shared insights and conclusions, and ultimately and most importantly into action they need to be able to illicit.
 
−
</p></div>
 
  
−
</div>
+
<p>[[STORIES|Federation through Stories]], where we use [[vignettes]] (short, lively, catchy, sticky... real-life people and situation stories) to explain and empower some of the core ideas of the [[giants]]. A vignette liberates an insight from the language of a discipline and enables a non-expert to 'step into the shoes' of a leading thinker and 'look through his eye glasses'. By combining vignettes into [[threads]], and by weaving threads into [[patterns]] and patterns into [[gestalts]], we create a hierarchy of insights that can inform the handling of core practical issues including lifestyle, values, religion, innovation and governance. </p>
−
-----
 
−
 
 
−
<div class="row">
 
−
  <div class="col-md-2"><h2>See</h2></div>
 
−
  <div class="col-md-1"><big>&diams;</big></div>
 
−
 
 
−
<div class="col-md-9">
 
−
[[IMAGES|Federation through Images]], where we look at the fundamental or academic side of [[knowledge federation]]. Our ideas about what constitutes "good" knowledge and "good" information evolved since antiquity, and now find their foremost expression in science and philosophy. We show that the state of the art in science and philosophy ''requires'' that we change our inherited values, and that we update the practices that grew upon them. To combine the core ideas in this traditionally abstract field of interest and to make them easily comprehensible, we use metaphorical and often  paradoxical or thought-provoking images called [[ideograms]]. By combining the ideograms, the [[IMAGES]] module renders an accessible, cartoon-like introduction to the philosophical underpinnings of a refreshingly novel approach to knowledge. </div>
 
−
</div>
 
−
 
 
−
<div class="row">
 
−
  <div class="col-md-2"><h2></h2></div>
 
−
  <div class="col-md-1"><big>&diams;</big></div>
 
  
−
<div class="col-md-9">
+
<!-- END OF THE known WORLD
−
[[STORIES|Federation through Stories]], where we use [[vignettes]] (short, lively, catchy, sticky... real-life people and situation stories) to explain and empower some of the core ideas of the [[giants]]. A vignette liberates an insight from the language of a discipline and enables a non-expert to 'step into the shoes' of a leading thinker and 'look through his eye glasses'. By combining vignettes into [[threads]], and by weaving threads into [[patterns]] and patterns into [[gestalts]], we create a hierarchy of insights that can inform the handling of core practical issues including lifestyle, values, religion, innovation and governance. </div>
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
  

Revision as of 08:23, 6 August 2018

Imagine

Introducing knowledge federation

To understand the meaning and purpose of knowledge federation, it may be best to recall humanity's condition at the eve of the Middle Ages: ravaging wars, horrifying epidemics, infamous inquisition trials... Bring to mind the iconic image of Galilei in house prison, a century after Copernicus, whispering "eppur si muove" into his beard. The problems of the day were not resolved by focusing on those problems, but by a slow development of a whole new approach to knowledge. Several centuries of unprecedented progress followed. Could it be similar today?

Our purpose is to 'connect the dots'

"If I have seen further," Sir Isaac Newton famously declared, "it is by standing on the shoulders of giants." Imagine if we would lose this all-important ability, to take advantage of the best ideas of our best minds: What sort of problems, and what situation would result? Imagine if we would then regain it: What opportunities would that open up?

</div>

Newton.jpg
Isaac Newton

</div>

A New Approach to Knowledge

<h3>A discovery</h3>

In Knowledge Federation we have made a discovery. We did not discover that the best insights of our best minds were drowning in an ocean of glut. The 20th century's giants reached that conclusion, and urged the scientists to find a remedy. But needless to say, that too drowned in an ocean of glut.

What we did find out, when we began to put the insights of giants together, was that just as the case was in Newton's time, a new approach to knowledge is ready to be born. And that this new approach to knowledge leads to new answers to core questions – including the nature of truth and meaning, in what way might happiness be successfully pursued, what still impedes our freedom and democracy, and what technological innovation may need to be like to benefit us far more than it currently does.

Our Initiative

<h3>We want to make a difference</h3>

“You never change things by fighting the existing reality", observed Buckminster Fuller. "To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”

The issue that is being proactively problematized on these pages is the way we handle a most precious resource – human creativity (or insight, ingenuity, capacity to envision and induce change...) and its fruits accumulated through the ages – at the moment in our history where we may need to depend on it more than we ever did.

We have undertaken to make a difference by igniting or as we call it bootstrapping a whole new course of action. What you'll find on these pages is a complete "new model", or as we like to call it a prototype, of a whole new approach to knowledge – which touches upon a spectrum of relevant issues ranging from epistemology and methods to social organization of knowledge work and technology. Our prototype includes even a deployment strategy – which is already being put into use, as you are reading these pages.

Fuller.jpg
R. Buckminster Fuller

Imagine

<h3>Federation through Images</h3>

Our ideas about what constitutes "good" knowledge and "good" information evolved since antiquity, and now find their foremost expression in science and philosophy. We show that the state of the art in science and philosophy requires that we change our inherited values, and that we update the practices that grew upon them. We render the core ideas in this traditionally abstract field as metaphorical and often paradoxical images called ideograms. The result is a cartoon-like introduction to the philosophical underpinnings of a refreshingly new approach to knowledge. <h3>Federation through Stories</h3> <p>Federation through Stories, where we use vignettes (short, lively, catchy, sticky... real-life people and situation stories) to explain and empower some of the core ideas of the giants. A vignette liberates an insight from the language of a discipline and enables a non-expert to 'step into the shoes' of a leading thinker and 'look through his eye glasses'. By combining vignettes into threads, and by weaving threads into patterns and patterns into gestalts, we create a hierarchy of insights that can inform the handling of core practical issues including lifestyle, values, religion, innovation and governance.

Retrieved from "http://kf.wikiwiki.ifi.uio.no/index.php?title=Main_Page&oldid=957"