Difference between revisions of "IMAGES"

From Knowledge Federation
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 29: Line 29:
 
   <div class="col-md-3"></div>
 
   <div class="col-md-3"></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
<p>By representing our civilization as a bus, and our handling of information as its candle headlights, the Modernity [[ideograms|<em>ideogram</em>]] points to a root cause of the contemporary issues. Strangely (aren't we living in the Age of Information?), information is that one thing, centrally important, that we've somehow forgotten to modernize. </p>
+
<p>By representing our civilization as a bus, and our handling of information as its candle headlights, the Modernity [[ideograms|<em>ideogram</em>]] points to a root cause of large and small contemporary issues. Strangely (aren't we living in the Age of Information?), information is that one centrally important thing that we've somehow forgotten to modernize! </p>
<p>Imagine us riding in that bus with candle headlights, through obscure and uncharted terrain, and at an accelerating speed. The direction that the bus will take is determined by our likes and dislikes, decisions and priorities. The movement of the bus is the result of our creative work, of our efforts to reach a better condition. To be meaningfully directed and sustainable, posits the Modernity [[ideograms|<em>ideogram</em>]], our movement into the future must be suitably informed. The information we have is not at all suitable for that purpose. It has evolved based on an old principle of operation and technology, and for an entirely different purpose. A new <em>approach</em> to knowledge is needed, which combines the new purpose with the new technology.</p>
+
<p>Imagine us riding in a bus with candle headlights, through obscure and uncharted terrain, and at an accelerating speed. The direction that the bus will take is determined by our likes and dislikes, decisions and priorities. The movement of the bus is the result of our creative work, of our efforts to reach a better condition. To be meaningfully directed and sustainable, posits the Modernity [[ideograms|<em>ideogram</em>]], our movement into the future must be suitably informed. The information we have is not at all suitable for that purpose. It has evolved based on an old principle of operation and technology, and for an entirely different purpose. A new <em>approach</em> to knowledge is needed, which combines the new purpose with the new technology.</p>
 
<h3>Knowledge federation</h3>
 
<h3>Knowledge federation</h3>
 
<p>You may now easily understand [[knowledge federation|<em>knowledge federation</em>]] as a [[prototypes|<em>prototype</em>]] of a socio-technical 'light bulb'. You may understand our project as an initiative to create new 'headlights', and to put them to practical use.</p>
 
<p>You may now easily understand [[knowledge federation|<em>knowledge federation</em>]] as a [[prototypes|<em>prototype</em>]] of a socio-technical 'light bulb'. You may understand our project as an initiative to create new 'headlights', and to put them to practical use.</p>
Line 39: Line 39:
 
<p>Hence the [[Modernity ideogram]] also points to a better way to use our creative capabilities in general. We call it [[systemic innovation|<em>systemic innovation</em>]], and define it as "innovation toward [[wholeness|<em>wholeness</em>]]".  [[systemic innovation|<em>Systemic innovation</em>]] is the innovation whose goal is to secure the wholeness (or proper function or "sustainability" or "thrivability"...) of the system or the systems in which what is being innovated has a role.</p>
 
<p>Hence the [[Modernity ideogram]] also points to a better way to use our creative capabilities in general. We call it [[systemic innovation|<em>systemic innovation</em>]], and define it as "innovation toward [[wholeness|<em>wholeness</em>]]".  [[systemic innovation|<em>Systemic innovation</em>]] is the innovation whose goal is to secure the wholeness (or proper function or "sustainability" or "thrivability"...) of the system or the systems in which what is being innovated has a role.</p>
 
<p>Notice that [[systemic innovation|<em>systemic innovation</em>]] points to a quite profound change of our values and priorities – beyond treating information, or anything else, as a commodity;  beyond maximizing "shareholder value", or catering to "market needs". </p>
 
<p>Notice that [[systemic innovation|<em>systemic innovation</em>]] points to a quite profound change of our values and priorities – beyond treating information, or anything else, as a commodity;  beyond maximizing "shareholder value", or catering to "market needs". </p>
<p>[[knowledge federation|<em>knowledge federation</em>]] and [[systemic innovation|<em>systemic innovation</em>]] are so closely related, that they may almost be considered as synonymous. [[knowledge federation|<em>Knowledge federation</em>]] is the result of [[systemic innovation|<em>systemic innovation</em>]] in knowledge work. And if [[knowledge federation|<em>knowledge federation</em>]] should be complete, [[systemic innovation|<em>systemic innovation</em>]] must be its objective and result.</p></div>
+
<p>[[knowledge federation|<em>knowledge federation</em>]] and [[systemic innovation|<em>systemic innovation</em>]] are so closely related, that they may almost be considered as synonymous. [[knowledge federation|<em>Knowledge federation</em>]] is the result of [[systemic innovation|<em>systemic innovation</em>]] in knowledge work. And if [[knowledge federation|<em>knowledge federation</em>]] should be complete, [[systemic innovation|<em>systemic innovation</em>]] must be its objective and result.</p>
 +
 
 +
<h3>Guided evolution of society</h3>
 +
<p>The [[Modernity ideogram]] also points to the nature of the emerging larger societal [[paradigm|<em>paradigm</em>]], which is really a new of evolving culturally and socially, or metaphorically a new direction for our 'bus'. This new direction has been called "guided evolution of society", and we have adopted this as one of our own technical [[keywords|<em>keywords</em>]].</p>
 +
<p>To be sustainable (or safe, purposeful, meaningful), our societal, cultural and technological evolution, or our ride into the future, must be suitably informed. A natural place to begin  this new evolutionary course is to adapt the way our information is created and used – which is of course what we've been talking about.</p> </div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 46: Line 50:
 
   <div class="col-md-3"><h2>A new way to establish facts</h2></div>
 
   <div class="col-md-3"><h2>A new way to establish facts</h2></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7"><h3>Federation as justification</h3>
 
<div class="col-md-7"><h3>Federation as justification</h3>
<p>Information that points to direction – of which the Modernity [[ideograms|<em>ideogram</em>]] is an example – need to be made reliable through suitable [[justification|<em>justification</em>]]. In what follows we provide a [[justification|<em>justification</em>]] of the claim made by the Modernity ideogram with the help of a series of four [[ideograms|<em>ideograms</em>]]. Each of them is further is justified in a separate document by 'connecting the dots' or 'standing on the shoulders of giants'.  Hence we both establish the claim we made about new approach to knowledge, by grounding it on already established facts and insights – <em>and</em> demonstrate some suitable techniques.</p>
+
<p>Information which we may rely on to orient our efforts – of which the [[Modernity ideogram]] is an example – needs to be itself reliably founded or [[justification|<em>justified</em>]]. In what follows we provide a [[justification|<em>justification</em>]] of the claim made by the Modernity ideogram with the help of a series of four [[ideograms|<em>ideograms</em>]]. Each of them is further justified in a separate document, by 'connecting the dots' or 'standing on the shoulders of giants'.  Hence we both establish the claim we made about new approach to knowledge, by grounding it on already established facts and insights – <em>and</em> demonstrate some suitable techniques.</p>
<p>Each of the first four [[ideograms|<em>ideograms</em>]] presented here will point to a reversal of the conventional academic practice. The fifth will explain [[knowledge federation|<em>knowledge federation</em>]] as practice. Click on the name of the [[ideograms|<em>ideogram</em>]] to open the document where the reversal or the practice is justified and explained.</p></div>
+
<p>Each of the first four [[ideograms|<em>ideograms</em>]] presented here will point to a reversal of the conventional academic practice. The fifth will explain how [[knowledge federation|<em>knowledge federation</em>]] follows as a practice. Click on the name of the [[ideograms|<em>ideogram</em>]] to open the document where the reversal or the practice is justified and explained.</p></div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
   <div class="col-md-3"><h2></h2></div>
+
   <div class="col-md-3"><h2>See</h2></div>
 
<div class="col-md-6"><h3>Reversing the purpose</h3>
 
<div class="col-md-6"><h3>Reversing the purpose</h3>
 
<p>Text</p></div>
 
<p>Text</p></div>

Revision as of 09:28, 9 August 2018

Rebuilding the foundations

What distinguishes academic knowledge

No rational person will claim that knowledge should not be useful. And yet there are good reasons why practical skills such as cooking and automobile repair have not been admitted to the university. Academic knowledge is the knowledge of principles; it is knowledge that is rigorously founded in time-tested academic methods and procedures.

Our standards of excellence and ideas of what constitutes good or academic knowledge and knowledge work have been evolving since antiquity, and they now find their foremost expression in science and philosophy. We are about to see that the fundamental insights reached in the 20th century science and philosophy legitimize, and indeed demand that we take a further step in this evolution. We shall see how this naturally leads to the creation of principles that inform our handling of life's basic issues. We shall see why even the most honorable notion of fundamental work or "basic research" can justifiably be applied to the development of the methods and the social processes by which those principles are created.

The technical word is paradigm. We use this word to point both to the just mentioned emerging paradigm in knowledge work, and to the larger paradigm in cultural and societal evolution that may be expected to result from its application.

When making a case for a new academic paradigm, we are not making a case against the prevailing one. Those paradigms are (to use Thomas Kuhn's useful keyword) incommensurable – each of them is more suitable for certain purposes than for others. The purpose we have in mind is, once again, to functionally inform our society.


Ideograms

Not all images are worth one thousand words

But the ideograms are! They play a similar role in knowledge federation as mathematical formulas do in traditional science. An ideogram can condense a wealth of insights and many pages of text into an image whose message can be recognized at a glance. Recall the Newton's formula, or Einstein's ubiquitous E=mc² – those too are ideograms! But the possibilities behind the ideographic approach are endless, and they vastly surpass the conventional maths.

The creative possibilities of ideograms also surpass our illustrations – and are yet to be developed through creative use of new media.

The ideogram we are about to see next renders the essential ideas behind our initiative in a nutshell.


A better way to be creative

Modernity ideogram

The Modernity ideogram renders also the nature of our and our civilization's present condition in a nutshell.

Modernity.jpg
Modernity ideogram

By representing our civilization as a bus, and our handling of information as its candle headlights, the Modernity ideogram points to a root cause of large and small contemporary issues. Strangely (aren't we living in the Age of Information?), information is that one centrally important thing that we've somehow forgotten to modernize!

Imagine us riding in a bus with candle headlights, through obscure and uncharted terrain, and at an accelerating speed. The direction that the bus will take is determined by our likes and dislikes, decisions and priorities. The movement of the bus is the result of our creative work, of our efforts to reach a better condition. To be meaningfully directed and sustainable, posits the Modernity ideogram, our movement into the future must be suitably informed. The information we have is not at all suitable for that purpose. It has evolved based on an old principle of operation and technology, and for an entirely different purpose. A new approach to knowledge is needed, which combines the new purpose with the new technology.

Knowledge federation

You may now easily understand knowledge federation as a prototype of a socio-technical 'light bulb'. You may understand our project as an initiative to create new 'headlights', and to put them to practical use.

No sequence of improvements of the candle will produce the light bulb. Hence we created this prototype as a proof of concept. And we are now raising this banner on the academic and creative frontier where the 'light bulb' can continue to be developed and improved.

Systemic innovation

The headlights are just a tiny part of the bus. Their monetary value is negligible in comparison. And yet they will determine the actual value of the whole big thing! The design of the headlights will ultimately decide whether the bus ends up being a mass-suicide machine, or a vehicle of taking us safely to any place or condition where we may reasonably want to be.

Hence the Modernity ideogram also points to a better way to use our creative capabilities in general. We call it systemic innovation, and define it as "innovation toward wholeness". Systemic innovation is the innovation whose goal is to secure the wholeness (or proper function or "sustainability" or "thrivability"...) of the system or the systems in which what is being innovated has a role.

Notice that systemic innovation points to a quite profound change of our values and priorities – beyond treating information, or anything else, as a commodity; beyond maximizing "shareholder value", or catering to "market needs".

knowledge federation and systemic innovation are so closely related, that they may almost be considered as synonymous. Knowledge federation is the result of systemic innovation in knowledge work. And if knowledge federation should be complete, systemic innovation must be its objective and result.

Guided evolution of society

The Modernity ideogram also points to the nature of the emerging larger societal paradigm, which is really a new of evolving culturally and socially, or metaphorically a new direction for our 'bus'. This new direction has been called "guided evolution of society", and we have adopted this as one of our own technical keywords.

To be sustainable (or safe, purposeful, meaningful), our societal, cultural and technological evolution, or our ride into the future, must be suitably informed. A natural place to begin this new evolutionary course is to adapt the way our information is created and used – which is of course what we've been talking about.


A new way to establish facts

Federation as justification

Information which we may rely on to orient our efforts – of which the Modernity ideogram is an example – needs to be itself reliably founded or justified. In what follows we provide a justification of the claim made by the Modernity ideogram with the help of a series of four ideograms. Each of them is further justified in a separate document, by 'connecting the dots' or 'standing on the shoulders of giants'. Hence we both establish the claim we made about new approach to knowledge, by grounding it on already established facts and insights – and demonstrate some suitable techniques.

Each of the first four ideograms presented here will point to a reversal of the conventional academic practice. The fifth will explain how knowledge federation follows as a practice. Click on the name of the ideogram to open the document where the reversal or the practice is justified and explained.

See

Reversing the purpose

Text

Magical Mirror.jpg
Mirror ideogram

Reversing the method

Text

Polyscopy.jpg
Polyscopy ideogram

Reversing the direction of growth

Text

Crossroads.jpg
Science on a Crossroads ideogram

Reversing the structure

Text

Information.jpg
Information ideogram

Federating knowledge

Text

Holarchy.jpg
Holarchy ideogram

Selected examples

How to "change course"

The examples we show below all have to do with "changing course" – they are selected in areas that are pivotal to the direction our societal evolution has taken.

Redirecting innovation

Text

Modernity.jpg
Modernity ideogram

Redirecting the pursuit of happiness

Text

Convenience Paradox.jpg
Convenience Paradox ideogram

Redirecting democracy

Text

Power Structure.jpg
Power Structure ideogram