Difference between revisions of "IMAGES"

From Knowledge Federation
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 38: Line 38:
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-3"><font size="+1">Information ideogram explains how the (socio-technical) lightbulb works.</font></div>
 
<div class="col-md-3"><font size="+1">Information ideogram explains how the (socio-technical) lightbulb works.</font></div>
<div class="col-md-7"><p>What I've just shared explains some of the realistic optimism that distinguishes this proposal: To solve "the huge problems now confronting us"—we <em>do not</em> need to wrestle with "the 1%"; we do not need to convince the politicians; the key to solutions is in <em>our</em> hands—in the hands of publicly sponsored intellectuals! The people out there look up to <em>us</em> to tell them what <em><b>information</b></em> needs to be like; we only need to <em>act</em> in accord with the social role we already <em>have</em>.</p>
+
<div class="col-md-7"><p>You'll easily comprehend the Information  ideogram if you think of <em><b>knowledge federation</b></em> as a collective climb to a mountain top; from where we can clearly see where the roads lead—and which one we need to follow.</p>  
<p>In the <em>Liberation</em> book I sketched the gist of this strategy by drafting a parallel between <em><b>information</b></em> and computer programs; and sharing in a <em><b>vignette</b></em> how—when in the early days of computing ambitious software projects resulted in thousands of tangled up lines of code, which nobody could comprehend or correct—the solution was found in the creation of "software design methodologies"; whose creators considered themselves <em>accountable</em> for the (conceptual <em>and</em> technical) tools they gave to programmers.</p>
 
<h3>We academic people too must become accountable.</h3>
 
<p>For the (conceptual and technical) <em><b>information</b></em> tools we give to researchers <em>and</em> to society; because it is those tools that now determine whether <em><b>information</b></em> will result in a chaos—or in new order.</p>
 
<p>What <em>should</em> <em><b>information</b></em> be like? Ole-Johan Dahl and C.A.R. Hoare wrote in <em>Structured Programming</em> in 1972, in a chapter called “Hierarchical Program Structures”:</p>
 
<p>“As the result of the large capacity of computing instruments, we have to deal with computing processes of such complexity that they can hardly be understood in terms of basic general purpose concepts. The limit is set by the nature of our intellect: precise thinking is possible only in terms of a small number of elements at a time. The only efficient way to deal with complicated systems is in a hierarchical fashion. The dynamic system is constructed and understood in terms of high level concepts, which are in turn constructed and understood in terms of lower level concepts, and so forth.”</p>
 
<p>Dahl received the Turing Award (the computer science equivalent for the Nobel Prize) for co-authoring the Object Oriented Methodology; which empowers the programmers to deliver comprehensible, reusable, verifiable and modifiable code by structuring it in terms of "objects". The answer I offered, which the Information ideogram illustrates, is a remake of the same idea; I call it <em><b>information holon</b></em>. Arthur Koestler coined the keyword "holon" to denote something that is both a whole in itself and a piece in a larger whole; and I applied it to information. </p>
 
 
<p>[[File:Information.jpg]] <br><small><center>Information ideogram</center></small></p>
 
<p>[[File:Information.jpg]] <br><small><center>Information ideogram</center></small></p>
<p>The Information ideogram is an “i”  (for "information"), composed as a circle or dot or <em><b>point</b></em> on top of a <em><b>rectangle</b></em>; inscribed in a triangle representing the metaphorical <em><b>mountain</b></em>. You may interpret the <em><b>rectangle</b></em> as representing a multitude of documents; and the <em><b>point</b></em> as the point of it all; and this <em><b>ideogram</b></em> as a way to say what's obvious—that without a <em><b>point</b></em>,  a myriad of printed pages are just <em><b>point</b></em>-less!</p>
+
<p>The Information ideogram is an “i”  (for "information"), composed as a circle or dot or <em><b>point</b></em> on top of a <em><b>rectangle</b></em>; inscribed in a triangle representing the metaphorical <em><b>mountain</b></em>. You may interpret the <em><b>rectangle</b></em> as a multitude of documents; and the <em><b>point</b></em> as the point of it all; and this <em><b>ideogram</b></em> as a way to way the obvious—that without a <em><b>point</b></em>,  a myriad of printed pages are just <em><b>point</b></em>-less!</p>
<p> The triangle or the <em><b>mountain</b></em> stands for a structure of viewpoints I call <em><b>scopes</b></em>; which you'll comprehend if you consider that every standpoint on a mountain offers you a view; and this view is always <em><b>coherent</b></em>—you can either look at a tree nearby, or at a forest far below; you can bend down to inspect a flower, or climb up the mountain to see the whole terrain—but you never see both in the <em>same</em> view. The <em><b>mountain</b></em> stands for the purpose of it all.</p>  
+
<p>You'll comprehend this proposal still more precisely if you imagine the <em><b>mountain</b></em> as a structure of viewpoints; which offer you <b>coherent</b></em> views (you can look at a near-by tree, or at a far-away forest; you can bend down to inspect a flower, or climb up the mountain to see the whole terrain); and think of <em><b>knowledge federation</b></em> as the collective process by which we'll build this <em><b>mountain</b></em>; in the light of the new competence (conscious evolution) that <em><b>information</b></em> must be able to provide:</p>  
<h3>We can come out of "information jungle" by climbing to a <em><b>mountain</b></em> top.</h3>
+
<h3>We can rise above the "information jungle" by climbing to a <em><b>mountain</b></em> top.</h3>  
<p>And <em>see</em> where the roads lead; and which one we need to follow. </p>
+
<p>We create meaning by using abstraction; the Information ideogram illustrates its three kinds:</p>  
<p>We create meaning by using abstraction. The Information ideogram points to three kinds of abstraction:</p>  
 
 
<ul>  
 
<ul>  
<li>You'll comprehend <em><b>horizontal abstraction</b></em>, which is represented by the <em><b>rectangle</b></em>, if you think of projective geometry; where a complex object is depicted in terms of a collection of suitably chosen projection planes; so that each of them presents a simple image, while together—they show the object from all sides</li>  
+
<li><em><b>Horizontal abstraction</b></em>, represented by the <em><b>rectangle</b></em>—which you'll comprehend if you think of looking at an object from a specific side</li>  
<li>You'll comprehend the <em><b>vertical abstraction</b></em>, which is represented by the <em><b>point</b></em>, if you think of going <em>up</em> a mountain toward the mountain top—where the whole terrain is visible and the choice of direction is safe and easy</li>  
+
<li><em><b>Vertical abstraction</b></em>, represented by the <em><b>point</b></em>—which you'll comprehend if you think of going <em>up</em> the <em>mountain</em> toward its top; where the whole terrain is visible and the choice of direction is easy</li>  
<li>You'll comprehend <em><b>structural abstraction</b></em>, which is represented by the <em><b>mountain</b></em>, if you think of the all-important capability a mountain may offer—to consciously <em>choose</em> your viewpoint; and have a simple and <em><b>coherent</b></em> view.</li>  
+
<li><em><b>Structural abstraction</b></em>, represented by the triangle or the <em><b>mountain</b></em>—which you'll comprehend if you consider how important it is to be able to consciously choose the ways—<em>several</em> ways—to look at an object; if your task is to see it whole. </li>  
 
</ul>  
 
</ul>  
<p>The <em><b>mountain</b></em>, which is technically called <em><b>information holarchy</b></em>, is composed of <em><b>information holons</b></em>; where the <em><b>points</b></em> of more detailed <em><b>holons</b></em> serve as dots to be connected to compose more general ones.</p>  
+
<p>The Information ideogram depicts the <em><b>information holon</b></em>—which is offered as a structuring template and principle; Arthur Koestler coined the keyword "holon" to denote something that is both a whole in itself and a piece in a larger whole, and I applied it to information. The <em><b>mountain</b></em>, technically called <em><b>information holarchy</b></em>, is composed of <em><b>information holons</b></em>, so that the <em><b>points</b></em> of more detailed <em><b>holons</b></em> serve as dots to be connected to create those more general ones.</p>  
<p>Like "architecture" and "design", <em><b>knowledge federation</b></em> is both an activity or <em><b>praxis</b></em> (informed practice), and an academic field that develops it. Its function is to complement publishing or broadcasting, by organizing us in co-creating the <em><b>mountain</b></em>; and enabling <em><b>information</b></em> to result in <em><b>knowledge</b></em>; which subsumes, you'll recall, <em><b>knowledge</b></em>-based action and re-building or "changing the world"—qguxg "guided" or <em><b>informed</b></em> evolution of society necessitates.</p>  
+
<p>Like "architecture" and "design", <em><b>knowledge federation</b></em> is both an activity or <em><b>praxis</b></em> (informed practice), and an academic field that develops it. Its function is to complement publishing or broadcasting, by organizing us in co-creating <em><b>mountains</b></em>; and in effect adding a third dimension to otherwise flat information; and enabling <em><b>information</b></em> to result in <em><b>knowledge</b></em>; which subsumes, you'll recall, <em><b>knowledge</b></em>-based action that constitutes "conscious evolution" as Bánáthy called it, or "changing the world" as it's more commonly known.</p>  
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
Line 104: Line 97:
 
<div class="col-md-3 round-images"> [[File:Einstein.jpg]] <br><small><center>[[Albert Einstein]]</center></small></div>
 
<div class="col-md-3 round-images"> [[File:Einstein.jpg]] <br><small><center>[[Albert Einstein]]</center></small></div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 +
<!--- XXXXXXX
 +
 +
<p>What I've just shared explains some of the realistic optimism that distinguishes this proposal: To solve "the huge problems now confronting us"—we <em>do not</em> need to wrestle with "the 1%"; we do not need to convince the politicians; the key to solutions is in <em>our</em> hands—in the hands of publicly sponsored intellectuals! The people out there look up to <em>us</em> to tell them what <em><b>information</b></em> needs to be like; we only need to <em>act</em> in accord with the social role we already <em>have</em>.</p>
 +
<p>In the <em>Liberation</em> book I sketched the gist of this strategy by drafting a parallel between <em><b>information</b></em> and computer programs; and sharing in a <em><b>vignette</b></em> how—when in the early days of computing ambitious software projects resulted in thousands of tangled up lines of code, which nobody could comprehend or correct—the solution was found in the creation of "software design methodologies"; whose creators considered themselves <em>accountable</em> for the (conceptual <em>and</em> technical) tools they gave to programmers.</p>
 +
<h3>We academic people too must become accountable.</h3>
 +
<p>For the (conceptual and technical) <em><b>information</b></em> tools we give to researchers <em>and</em> to society; because it is those tools that now determine whether <em><b>information</b></em> will result in a chaos—or in new order.</p>
 +
<p>What <em>should</em> <em><b>information</b></em> be like? Ole-Johan Dahl and C.A.R. Hoare wrote in <em>Structured Programming</em> in 1972, in a chapter called “Hierarchical Program Structures”:</p>
 +
<p>“As the result of the large capacity of computing instruments, we have to deal with computing processes of such complexity that they can hardly be understood in terms of basic general purpose concepts. The limit is set by the nature of our intellect: precise thinking is possible only in terms of a small number of elements at a time. The only efficient way to deal with complicated systems is in a hierarchical fashion. The dynamic system is constructed and understood in terms of high level concepts, which are in turn constructed and understood in terms of lower level concepts, and so forth.”</p>
 +
<p>Dahl received the Turing Award (the computer science equivalent for the Nobel Prize) for co-authoring the Object Oriented Methodology; which empowers the programmers to deliver comprehensible, reusable, verifiable and modifiable code by structuring it in terms of "objects". The answer I offered, which the Information ideogram illustrates, is a remake of the same idea; I call it <em><b>information holon</b></em>. Arthur Koestler coined the keyword "holon" to denote something that is both a whole in itself and a piece in a larger whole; and I applied it to information. </p>

Revision as of 15:38, 20 November 2023

– We’ve entered an age of information glut. And this is something no culture has really faced before. The typical situation is information scarcity. […] Lack of information can be very dangerous. […] But at the same time too much information can be dangerous, because it can lead to a situation of meaninglessness […].


(Neil Postman in a televised interview to Open Mind, 1990)

"[...] of people not having any basis for knowing what is relevant, what is irrelevant, what is useful, what is not useful, where they live in a culture that is simply committed, through all of its media, to generate tons of information every hour, without categorizing it in any way for you", Postman continued.

To federate knowledge means to connect the dots.

And add insight (correct interpretation or meaning) to an overload of data; of which "Our house is on fire" is the canonical example: You may know all the room temperatures; but it is only when you know that your house is on fire that you are empowered to act as your situation demands. An insight can ignite an emotional response; it can inject adrenaline into your bloodstream.

Our traditions have instructed us how to handle situations and contingencies by providing us a repertoire of insight and action pairs. But what about those situations that have not happened before?

Knowledge federation uses ideograms to create and communicate insights. An ideogram can condense one thousand words into an image; and make the point of it all recognizable at a glance; and communicate know-what in ways that incite action.

The existing knowledge federation ideograms are only a placeholder—for a variety of techniques that will be developed through artful and judicious use of media technology.

Modernity ideogram

Modernity ideogram explains the error that is the theme of this proposal.

By depicting our society as a bus and our information as its candle headlights, Modernity ideogram renders our situation in a nutshell.

Modernity.jpg

Modernity ideogram

Imagine us as passengers in a bus—which rushes at accelerating speed toward a disaster; because its headlights are too dim to show us the way.

Information must now intervene between us and the world.

Not any sort of information—but information that's been conscientiously designed for that pivotal function.

In Guided Evolution of Society, in 2001, systems scientist Béla H. Bánáthy surveyed a broad range of sources and reached this conclusion:

“We are the first generation of our species that has the privilege, the opportunity, and the burden of responsibility to engage in the process of our own evolution. We are indeed chosen people. We now have the knowledge available to us and we have the power of human and social potential that is required to initiate a new and historical social function: conscious evolution. But we can fulfill this function only if we develop evolutionary competence by evolutionary learning and acquire the will and determination to engage in conscious evolution. These are core requirements, because what evolution did for us up to now we have to learn to do for ourselves by guiding our own evolution.”

To foster the awareness of this new opportunity and responsibility, and develop the information that can provide us “evolutionary competence”—is the all-important new creative challenge the Modernity ideogram is pointing to.

I qualify something as pivotal if it decisively influences our society's evolutionary course; and as correct if it corrects it.

Information ideogram

Information ideogram explains how the (socio-technical) lightbulb works.

You'll easily comprehend the Information ideogram if you think of knowledge federation as a collective climb to a mountain top; from where we can clearly see where the roads lead—and which one we need to follow.

Information.jpg

Information ideogram

The Information ideogram is an “i” (for "information"), composed as a circle or dot or point on top of a rectangle; inscribed in a triangle representing the metaphorical mountain. You may interpret the rectangle as a multitude of documents; and the point as the point of it all; and this ideogram as a way to way the obvious—that without a point, a myriad of printed pages are just point-less!

You'll comprehend this proposal still more precisely if you imagine the mountain as a structure of viewpoints; which offer you coherent</em> views (you can look at a near-by tree, or at a far-away forest; you can bend down to inspect a flower, or climb up the mountain to see the whole terrain); and think of knowledge federation as the collective process by which we'll build this mountain; in the light of the new competence (conscious evolution) that information must be able to provide:

We can rise above the "information jungle" by climbing to a mountain top.

We create meaning by using abstraction; the Information ideogram illustrates its three kinds:

  • Horizontal abstraction, represented by the rectangle—which you'll comprehend if you think of looking at an object from a specific side
  • Vertical abstraction, represented by the point—which you'll comprehend if you think of going up the mountain toward its top; where the whole terrain is visible and the choice of direction is easy
  • Structural abstraction, represented by the triangle or the mountain—which you'll comprehend if you consider how important it is to be able to consciously choose the ways—several ways—to look at an object; if your task is to see it whole.

The Information ideogram depicts the information holon—which is offered as a structuring template and principle; Arthur Koestler coined the keyword "holon" to denote something that is both a whole in itself and a piece in a larger whole, and I applied it to information. The mountain, technically called information holarchy, is composed of information holons, so that the points of more detailed holons serve as dots to be connected to create those more general ones.

Like "architecture" and "design", knowledge federation is both an activity or praxis (informed practice), and an academic field that develops it. Its function is to complement publishing or broadcasting, by organizing us in co-creating mountains; and in effect adding a third dimension to otherwise flat information; and enabling information to result in knowledge; which subsumes, you'll recall, knowledge-based action that constitutes "conscious evolution" as Bánáthy called it, or "changing the world" as it's more commonly known.

Holotopia ideogram

Holotopia ideogram offers a glimpse of a new evolutionary course we'll see and follow, when proper light's been turned on.

The holotopia initiative is knowledge federation's proof of concept application. It is also the vision that resulted when we applied knowledge federation to five pivotal categories—high-level themes that decisively influences our (society's) evolutionary course:

  • innovation—our technology-augmented capability to create, and induce change
  • information—which by definition includes not only written documents, but all other forms of heritage or recorded human experience that may help us illuminate the course; and also the social processes by which information is created and put to use
  • foundation—on which we develop knowledge; which decides what in our cultural heritage will continue to evolve—and what will be abandoned to decay
  • method—by which we create knowledge; and distinguish knowledge from belief
  • values—which direct "the pursuit of happiness" and our other pursuits.

When we applied knowledge federation to these five categories, the five points resulted; and showed that in each case the "conventional wisdom" needs to be thoroughly reversed.

Holotopia-id.jpg

Holotopia ideogram

The Holotopia ideogram comprises five pillars, each of which has a pivotal category as base and a point or insight as capital; which resulted by accounting for what's been academically published or otherwise reported to elevate us above "the world". The ten themes—represented by the edges joining the five insights—point to the fact that when other similarly important themes such as creativity, religion and education are considered in the context of those five pointstheir comprehension and handling too ends up being revised and reversed.

An overarching insight resulted from this experiment:

We are not informed.

Our comprehension and handling of the themes that determine our know-what, and of other core themes of our lives and times too—are at the level where our comprehension of natural phenomena was in pre-scientific times. We have all the information we need to create a radically different and better world; but this information is not part of our collective awareness; it is not reflected by the way in which we think and act.

The stars on Holotopia ideogram stand for "reaching for the stars"—i.e. for the sort of achievements and changes that may now be unthinkable; which will be normal in the informed order of things that holotopia initiative undertakes to foster.

My appeal

– A new type of thinking is essential if mankind is to survive and move toward higher levels.


(Albert Einstein, New York Times, 1946)

In the movie The Matrix, "the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth" epitomized a situation where people live in a devastated and dying world ruled by machines—and in a falsified "reality" that makes the world appear to them as normal; in the Liberation book it epitomizes the situation where people live without guiding insights or principles; where their only reference system is the world itself and its various descriptions; which compels the people to adapt to the world, instead of comprehending it critically.

We live in such a world.

My appeal is to institute a new science—by which I mean to develop a new information praxis, with the dexterity that characterizes science, and offer it to our society by giving it the social esteem that science now enjoys; by which academic and other information will be turned into knowledge; and acted on.

My point is that this course of action is both the human obligation we have toward our next generation—and the necessary next step in academic evolution.

This knowledge federation proposal constitutes a case for this appeal; and makes it actionable.