Difference between revisions of "Holotopia"

From Knowledge Federation
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 563: Line 563:
 
<p>We bring these lofty and "up in the air" possibilities down to earth, by discussing one of the more immediately practical consequences of the proposed course of action.</p>  
 
<p>We bring these lofty and "up in the air" possibilities down to earth, by discussing one of the more immediately practical consequences of the proposed course of action.</p>  
  
<p>
 
[[File:Beck-frame.jpeg]]
 
</p>
 
<p>Beck continued the above observation:</p>
 
<blockquote>
 
"Max Weber's 'iron cage' – in which he thought humanity was condemned to live for the foreseeable future – is for me the prison of <em>categories and basic assumptions</em> of classical social, cultural and political sciences."
 
</blockquote>
 
 
<p><em>Reification</em> keeps us in 'iron cage'.</p>
 
 
<blockquote><em>Truth by convention</em> is an academically rigorous way out.</blockquote>
 
  
 
<p>The [[keyword|<em>keywords</em>]] we've been using all along are all defined by convention.</p>
 
<p>The [[keyword|<em>keywords</em>]] we've been using all along are all defined by convention.</p>
Line 844: Line 833:
  
 
</div> </div>  
 
</div> </div>  
 +
 +
BBB -->
  
  
Line 850: Line 841:
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
  
<h3>The solution is a <em>paradigm</em></h3>
 
  
<p>Already this very brief sketch of the <em>five insights</em> gives us a glimpse of the anatomy and pathophysiology of the "problematique". And lets us anticipate why the "solutionatique" will not be a result of mere preoccupation with what we perceive as issues or "problems". And why its results will be a lot more than mere solutions to problems; why the solution will indeed be "a great cultural revival", or the <em>holotopia</em>.</p>  
+
<p>When the <em>five insights</em> are combined together, they readily lead to a more general <em>sixth insight</em>, which is even more germane to the <em>holotopia</em>'s message and spirit. The <em>sixth insight</em> may be roughly formulated as follows:</p>  
  
<p>The <em>power structure</em> insight showed that we cannot "solve our problems" without changing <em>the systems in which we live and work</em>—which organize us in ways that <em>create</em> problems; <em>or</em> make us collectively incapable of understanding them and taking care of them.</p>  
+
<blockquote>To change anything, we need to change the whole thing.</blockquote>  
  
<p>The <em>collective mind</em> insight gave us a natural place to begin. We need to first of all update communication—which is what <em>turns</em> us the people into a system. And which—the tie between communication and action having been severed—turns us into systems that make us collectively 'brain dead'—and hence scheduled for extinction.</p>  
+
<p>The reason is the close co-dependence of both the structural problems the <em>five insights</em> reveal, and of their solutions.</p>  
  
<p>The <em>socialized reality</em> and the <em>narrow frame</em> insight together pointed to a place where the not is tied, and how to untie it (or technically, to the "systemic leverage point" and to the natural strategy for change). As long as we consider the purpose of information to be giving us "an objective reality picture", or in other words as long as we <em>reify</em> our present knowledge-work institutions and practices and the information they give us, there is no hope for change, and vice versa. The <em>reification</em> results in mass production of "pieces", in the sciences and the media, which not only are unsuitable for seeing what each of us personally has to do—but indeed (having evolved within the <em>power structure</em>) systemically serve for (as Herman and Chomsky put it) "manufacturing consent".</p>  
+
<p>We have seen (while exploring the <em>power structure</em> insight) that we will not be able to resolve the characteristic contemporary issues and resume our cultural and societal evolution, unless we learned to direct our power to innovate by using suitable information and knowledge, instead of the "free competition" and the market. But that requires (as we have seen while exploring the <em>collective mind</em> insight) that we restore the severed tie between information and action—that instead of merely broadcasting information, we learn to <em>federate</em> the insights that can motivate and inform action. This, however (as the <em>socialized reality</em> insight showed) requires that we change the relationship we have with information—from considering it as a mirror image of reality, to considering it a vital element of our core <em>systems</em>, which must be adapted to the purposes it needs to serve within those <em>systems</em>. </p>  
  
<p>What we are lacking—and the key element of solution—is the ability to create high-level insights, principles, rules of thumb, which can orient our action. Ways to <em>federate</em> the massive data into the kind of "pieces" that have agency and purpose. </p>  
+
<p>When that is done (the <em>narrow frame</em> insight showed)—the opportunity opens up to <em>create</em> "the way we look at the world, try to comprehend and handle it", to be used both by academic researchers who wish to work in this way, and the general public. And when that is in place (we showed while exploring the <em>convenience paradox</em> insight), the resulting <em>informed</em> way of "pursuing happiness" will lead to completely different values, and direction. Furthermore, the values that result will be exactly those that are needed to empower us to resolve the <em>power structure</em> issue, by self-organizing and co-creating <em>systems</em> that <em>resolve</em> our problems. This closes the circle.</p>  
  
<p>As soon as we do that, the <em>convenience paradox</em> insight showed, our very values and our "human quality" is bound to change radically—and lead to exactly the kind of values and behavior patterns on which the restructuring our <em>systems</em>, and resolving the <em>power structure</em> issue, now depends.</p>  
+
<p>A <em>strategic</em> insight results:</p>
  
<h3>Large change can be easy</h3>  
+
<blockquote>A large change may be easy; small changes may be difficult or impossible.</blockquote>  
  
<p>As we have just seen, the <em>five insights</em> and their solutions are so closely interdependent, that resolving one requires resolving all of them. This first part of a, larger <em>sixth insight</em> follows.</p>
+
<p>But a large and comprehensive change has its own logic, or process, or "leverage points". </p>  
  
<blockquote>A large and comprehensive change can be easy—even when much smaller and obviously necessary changes may have proven impossible.</blockquote>  
+
<p>And the most powerful <em>kind of</em> leverage point, [http://kf.wikiwiki.ifi.uio.no/CONVERSATIONS#Donella Donella Meadows pointed out], is "the power to transcend paradigms". It is exactly that power that we are proposing to restore.</p>  
  
<p>Comprehensive change, as the change of the system as a whole, has its own <em>systemic</em> way in which it may most easily be done. </p>
 
  
<h3>Occupy the university</h3>  
+
<p>We summarize the case for our proposal by a warning reaching us from sociology.</p>
 +
<p>
 +
[[File:Beck-frame.jpeg]]
 +
</p>
 +
<p>Beck continued the above observation:</p>
 +
<blockquote>
 +
"Max Weber's 'iron cage' – in which he thought humanity was condemned to live for the foreseeable future – is for me the prison of <em>categories and basic assumptions</em> of classical social, cultural and political sciences."
 +
</blockquote>
  
<p>We have also seen that each of the <em>five insights</em> is really a result of <em>federating</em> published more specific insights. And that our collective capability to do that now requires that "the relationship we have with information" be changed. That <em>this</em> is the natural leverage point to the large and comprehensive change, just as the case was in Galilei's time. Hence the second part of the <em>sixth insight</em> results.</p>
+
<p>The 'candle headlights' (<em>inheriting</em> the way we look at the world, try to comprehend it and handle it) is what keeps us in 'iron cage'.</p>  
  
<blockquote>The systemic leverage point is the university</blockquote>
+
<blockquote>A <em>created</em> way, modeled by the <em>holoscope</em>, is an academically rigorous way out.</blockquote>  
  
<p>The relationship we have with information is no longer in the hands of the Church, but of the university as institution, as the contemporary representative of the academic tradition. </p>  
+
<p>The <em>holotopia</em> is offered as the vision that results.</p>  
  
<p>From the point of view of the <em>holotopia</em>, this is <em>extremely</em> good news. To make decisive headway toward "a great cultural revival", we do not need to convince the political and business leaders. We do not need to occupy Wall street. We, publicly sponsored public servants, have the key to solution in our hands. </p>  
+
<p>The Holotopia project is conceived as a way to streamline the actualization of that vision.</p>  
  
<p>Since upholding the standard of "right" knowledge is the core task of <em>our</em> academic occupation, there is really nothing to occupy. We only need to do our job.</p>  
+
<p>When making this proposal, we are not saying anything new; we are indeed only <em>federating</em> the call to action that <em>many</em> have made before us.</p>
 +
<p>
 +
[[File:Jantsch-university.jpeg]]
 +
</p>
 +
<p>We are now, however, backing their calls to action and ideas by <em>federating</em> them, and showing that they form a consistent and complete <em>academic</em> paradigm.</p>  
  
<p>To make a completely clear argument, we defined <em>academia</em> as "institutionalized academic tradition". And we represented the academic tradition by Socrates as the progenitor of the original Academia, and Galilei as a progenitor of science and the academic tradition's revival, which led to the larger cultural revival. Both Socrates and Galilei stood up to the <em>power structure</em> of the day, by representing <em>new</em> ways to look at the world, based on <em>knowledge of knowledge</em>. The question, then, is <em>What does the contemporary university institutionalize</em>? Is it supporting <em>that</em> sort of work—or maintaining status quo, through <em>reification</em> of the existing habits and structures?</p>  
+
</div> </div>  
  
<p>When reiterating the call to action voiced by Vannevar Bush, Norbert Wiener, Erich Jantsch, Doug Engelbart, and so many others—we do that by submitting a complete <em>paradigm proposal</em>; by showing that their call to action can be responded to based on the time-honored academic standards. And indeed that the time-honored academic standards <em>demand</em> that we do that.</p>  
+
<b>This project description will be completed by</p>  
  
<h3>Human quality</h3>  
+
<div class="page-header" ><h2>A strategy</h2></div>
  
<p>The critical resource is—and has always been—people who love knowledge, or truth, or humanity, beyond the comfort of fitting into the <em>power structure</em> of the day. </p>  
+
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"></div>
 +
<div class="col-md-6">
 +
 
 +
<blockquote>The Holotopia project is conceived as a co-creative strategy game</blockquote>
 +
 
 +
<p>The project is conceived as a space—where we are empowered to use our creativity to "change course", and <em>create</em> a future. This "future", however, begins instantly.</p>  
  
<p>We have seen that the social and cultural ecology of the day is vehemently opposing it—so much so that we may be lacking even the critical amount that we need—even all other things being in place—to begin "a new course".</p>  
+
<p>We implement a strategy that <em>federates</em> Margaret Mead's specific insights, how to respond to the situation we are in :
 +
<blockquote>
 +
"(W)e are living in a period of extraordinary danger, as we are faced with the possibility that our whole species will be eliminated from the evolutionary scene. One necessary condition of successfully continuing our existence is the creation of an atmosphere of hope that the huge problems now confronting us can, in fact, be solved—and can be solved in time."
 +
</blockquote> </p>
 +
</div>  
  
<p>The Holotopia project may be understood as a strategic undertaking to create a space, and a <em>system</em> or social dynamic, in which a sufficiently strong remedial trend can emerge.</p>  
+
<div class="col-md-3">
 +
[[File:Mead.jpg]]<br>
 +
<small>Margaret Mead</small>
 +
</div> </div>
  
 +
<div class="page-header" ><h2>Tactical assets</h2></div>
  
<b>To be continued...</b>
 
  
<!-- XXX
+
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"></div>
 +
<div class="col-md-7"><p>To the above co-creative space we bring a portfolio of assorted <em>tactical assets</em>. </p>
  
 
</div> </div>  
 
</div> </div>  
 +
 +
<div class="page-header" ><h2>A pilot project</h2></div>
 +
 +
 +
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"></div>
 +
<div class="col-md-7"><p>To bring all this down to earth, we describe the pilot project we've developed in art gallery Kunsthall 3.14 in Bergen. </p>
 +
 +
 +
[[File:KunsthallDialog01.jpg]]
 +
<br>
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
<!-- CCC
  
 
<div class="page-header" ><h2>A strategy</h2></div>
 
<div class="page-header" ><h2>A strategy</h2></div>

Revision as of 08:25, 29 August 2020

Imagine...

You are about to board a bus for a long night ride, when you notice the flickering streaks of light emanating from two wax candles, placed where the headlights of the bus are expected to be. Candles? As headlights?

Of course, the idea of candles as headlights is absurd. So why propose it?

Because on a much larger scale this absurdity has become reality.

The Modernity ideogram renders the essence of our contemporary situation by depicting our society as an accelerating bus without a steering wheel, and the way we look at the world, try to comprehend and handle it as guided by a pair of candle headlights.

Modernity.jpg Modernity ideogram


The sixth insight


When the five insights are combined together, they readily lead to a more general sixth insight, which is even more germane to the holotopia's message and spirit. The sixth insight may be roughly formulated as follows:

To change anything, we need to change the whole thing.

The reason is the close co-dependence of both the structural problems the five insights reveal, and of their solutions.

We have seen (while exploring the power structure insight) that we will not be able to resolve the characteristic contemporary issues and resume our cultural and societal evolution, unless we learned to direct our power to innovate by using suitable information and knowledge, instead of the "free competition" and the market. But that requires (as we have seen while exploring the collective mind insight) that we restore the severed tie between information and action—that instead of merely broadcasting information, we learn to federate the insights that can motivate and inform action. This, however (as the socialized reality insight showed) requires that we change the relationship we have with information—from considering it as a mirror image of reality, to considering it a vital element of our core systems, which must be adapted to the purposes it needs to serve within those systems.

When that is done (the narrow frame insight showed)—the opportunity opens up to create "the way we look at the world, try to comprehend and handle it", to be used both by academic researchers who wish to work in this way, and the general public. And when that is in place (we showed while exploring the convenience paradox insight), the resulting informed way of "pursuing happiness" will lead to completely different values, and direction. Furthermore, the values that result will be exactly those that are needed to empower us to resolve the power structure issue, by self-organizing and co-creating systems that resolve our problems. This closes the circle.

A strategic insight results:

A large change may be easy; small changes may be difficult or impossible.

But a large and comprehensive change has its own logic, or process, or "leverage points".

And the most powerful kind of leverage point, Donella Meadows pointed out, is "the power to transcend paradigms". It is exactly that power that we are proposing to restore.


We summarize the case for our proposal by a warning reaching us from sociology.

Beck-frame.jpeg

Beck continued the above observation:

"Max Weber's 'iron cage' – in which he thought humanity was condemned to live for the foreseeable future – is for me the prison of categories and basic assumptions of classical social, cultural and political sciences."

The 'candle headlights' (inheriting the way we look at the world, try to comprehend it and handle it) is what keeps us in 'iron cage'.

A created way, modeled by the holoscope, is an academically rigorous way out.

The holotopia is offered as the vision that results.

The Holotopia project is conceived as a way to streamline the actualization of that vision.

When making this proposal, we are not saying anything new; we are indeed only federating the call to action that many have made before us.

Jantsch-university.jpeg

We are now, however, backing their calls to action and ideas by federating them, and showing that they form a consistent and complete academic paradigm.

This project description will be completed by</p>

The Holotopia project is conceived as a co-creative strategy game

The project is conceived as a space—where we are empowered to use our creativity to "change course", and create a future. This "future", however, begins instantly.

We implement a strategy that federates Margaret Mead's specific insights, how to respond to the situation we are in :

"(W)e are living in a period of extraordinary danger, as we are faced with the possibility that our whole species will be eliminated from the evolutionary scene. One necessary condition of successfully continuing our existence is the creation of an atmosphere of hope that the huge problems now confronting us can, in fact, be solved—and can be solved in time."

Mead.jpg
Margaret Mead


To the above co-creative space we bring a portfolio of assorted tactical assets.


To bring all this down to earth, we describe the pilot project we've developed in art gallery Kunsthall 3.14 in Bergen.


KunsthallDialog01.jpg