Difference between revisions of "Holotopia"

From Knowledge Federation
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 14: Line 14:
 
</div> </div>  
 
</div> </div>  
  
<!-- AAA
+
<!-- ;)
 +
 
 +
 
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
Line 358: Line 360:
 
</div> </div>  
 
</div> </div>  
  
BBB -->
 
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
Line 425: Line 426:
  
 
<p>Reality, the 20th century's scientists and philosophers found out, is not something we discover; it is something we <em>construct</em>. </p>  
 
<p>Reality, the 20th century's scientists and philosophers found out, is not something we discover; it is something we <em>construct</em>. </p>  
 +
 +
<p>In "Social Construction of Reality", Berger and Luckmann left us an analysis of the social process by which the reality is constructed. They pointed to the role that "universal theories" (which determine the relationship we have with information) play in maintaining a social and political status quo. An example is the Biblical worldview of Galilei's persecutors—but  not, of course, the only one.</p>
  
 
<p>
 
<p>
Line 430: Line 433:
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
<p>And this "reality construction", including the <em>perception</em> that our society's worldview and institutions are "reality" (which the sociologists called "doxa"),  serves as an invisible yet all-powerful instrument of our <em>socialization</em>. Our shared "reality picture" is the very 'glue' that holds us together in a society or culture. And hence in a certain order of things—or as we called it, a <em>power structure</em></p>  
+
<p>Pierre Bourdieu left us a thorough explanation of the interplay between reality construction and subtle "symbolic power", by which cultural and social roles, and our very preferences and behaviors, are developed and maintained—without anyone's conscious intention, or even awareness. In it, the <em>experience</em> that our <em>socialized reality</em> is <em>the</em> objectively given reality (which Bourdieu called "doxa"),  serves as an all-powerful instrument of <em>socialization</em>, giving the binding strength to the very 'glue' that holds us together in a certain order of things—or in <em>power structure</em>, as we called it.</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>This diagnosis suggests itself.</p>
  
<blockquote>The Enlightenment did not liberate us from power-related constructed "reality", as it is believed.</blockquote>  
+
<blockquote>The Enlightenment did not liberate us from power-related reality construction, as it is believed.</blockquote>  
  
<blockquote>Our <em>socialization</em> only changed hands—from the kings and the clergy, to the corporations and the media.</blockquote>  
+
<blockquote><em>Socialization</em> only changed hands—from the kings and the clergy, to the corporations and the media.</blockquote>  
  
<p>Ironically, the traditional academic self-identity—as an "objective" observer of "reality"—is keeping the <em>academia</em>, and information and knowledge at large, in the observer role; on the 'back seat', and without real impact.</p>  
+
<p>Ironically, the traditional and carefully cultivated academic self-identity—of an "objective" observer of reality—keeps the <em>academia</em>, and information and knowledge at large, on the 'back seat'; without impact.</p>  
  
  
Line 442: Line 447:
  
  
<!-- XXX
 
  
  

Revision as of 11:56, 20 August 2020

Imagine...

You are about to board a bus for a long night ride, when you notice the flickering streaks of light emanating from two wax candles, placed where the headlights of the bus are expected to be. Candles? As headlights?

Of course, the idea of candles as headlights is absurd. So why propose it?

Because on a much larger scale this absurdity has become reality.

The Modernity ideogram renders the essence of our contemporary situation by depicting our society as an accelerating bus without a steering wheel, and the way we look at the world, try to comprehend and handle it as guided by a pair of candle headlights.

Modernity.jpg Modernity ideogram