Difference between revisions of "Holotopia"

From Knowledge Federation
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 13: Line 13:
 
<small>Modernity <em>ideogram</em></small>  
 
<small>Modernity <em>ideogram</em></small>  
 
</div> </div>  
 
</div> </div>  
 +
 +
<!-- ;)
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
Line 146: Line 148:
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>The <em>scope</em></h2></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h2><em>Scope</em></h2></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 +
<p>In the <em>holoscope</em>, the deliberate choice of what we look at and how, or <em>scope</em>, is of a paramount importance.</p>
 +
 +
<blockquote>Where shall we look, and in what way, to "find a way to change course"?</blockquote>
 
<p>  
 
<p>  
 
[[File:FiveInsights.JPG]]<br>
 
[[File:FiveInsights.JPG]]<br>
Line 153: Line 158:
 
</p>  
 
</p>  
  
<p>What theme, what evidence, what "new discovery" might have the force commensurate with the momentum with which our civilization is rushing onward—and have a <em>realistic</em> chance to make it "change course"?</p>  
+
<p>What new insight or discovery might have the force commensurate with the momentum with which our civilization is rushing onward—and have a <em>realistic</em> chance to reverse its course?</p>  
 
<p>We offer these [[Holotopia:Five insights|<em>five insights</em>]] as a <em>prototype</em> answer. </p>  
 
<p>We offer these [[Holotopia:Five insights|<em>five insights</em>]] as a <em>prototype</em> answer. </p>  
 
<p>They result when we apply the <em>holoscope</em> to illuminate five pivotal themes:
 
<p>They result when we apply the <em>holoscope</em> to illuminate five pivotal themes:
Line 163: Line 168:
 
<li>Values (how we "pursue happiness")</li>  
 
<li>Values (how we "pursue happiness")</li>  
 
</ul> </p>  
 
</ul> </p>  
<p>For each of these five themes, we show that our conventional way of looking made us ignore a principle or a rule of thumb, which readily emerges when we 'connect the dots'—when we <em>combine</em> published insights. We see that by ignoring those principles, we have created deep <em>structural</em> problems ('crack in the cup')—which are causing problems, and "global issues" in particular.</p>  
+
<p>For each of these five themes, we show that our conventional way of looking made us ignore its crucially important side. And that  when we 'connect the dots'—when we <em>combine</em> published insights— a certain principle or a rule of thumb, which readily emerges, which compels us to change course.</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>We see that by ignoring those principles, we have created deep <em>structural</em> problems ('crack in the cup')—which are <em>causing</em> the perceived problems, or making us incapable of resolving them.</p>  
  
 +
<p>The effect of treating the problems as mere symptoms of deeper structural issues, and treating <em>those</em> instead, is expectedly well beyond the mere solutions to problems—which reinforces the <em>holotopia</em> vision.</p>
  
  

Revision as of 12:27, 16 August 2020

Imagine...

You are about to board a bus for a long night ride, when you notice the flickering streaks of light emanating from two wax candles, placed where the headlights of the bus are expected to be. Candles? As headlights?

Of course, the idea of candles as headlights is absurd. So why propose it?

Because on a much larger scale this absurdity has become reality.

The Modernity ideogram renders the essence of our contemporary situation by depicting our society as an accelerating bus without a steering wheel, and the way we look at the world, try to comprehend and handle it as guided by a pair of candle headlights.

Modernity.jpg Modernity ideogram