Difference between revisions of "Holotopia"

From Knowledge Federation
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-3"><h3>Modernity needs the lightbulb</h3></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h3>We have lost the sense of direction</h3></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
[[File:Postman-meaning.jpeg]]
 
[[File:Postman-meaning.jpeg]]
Line 12: Line 12:
 
<div class="col-md-6">
 
<div class="col-md-6">
 
<p>Imagine a world where information is treated as other human-made things—where information and the ways it's handled are adapted to the core purposes that need to be served. What would information be like? By what methods, in what way and by whom would it be created? What new information formats, new <em>kinds</em> of information would emerge? In what way would our public informing be different? What would academic communication be like? By creating our Knowledge Federation <em>prototype</em>, we provided an academically coherent answer to those and various other related questions—answers that are not only described and explained, but also already implemented in actual, real-life embedded <em>prototypes</em>.</p>
 
<p>Imagine a world where information is treated as other human-made things—where information and the ways it's handled are adapted to the core purposes that need to be served. What would information be like? By what methods, in what way and by whom would it be created? What new information formats, new <em>kinds</em> of information would emerge? In what way would our public informing be different? What would academic communication be like? By creating our Knowledge Federation <em>prototype</em>, we provided an academically coherent answer to those and various other related questions—answers that are not only described and explained, but also already implemented in actual, real-life embedded <em>prototypes</em>.</p>
 +
<p>But having done that, we are compelled to concede that what we are facing is not a problem but a paradox—the same paradox that the giants on whose shoulders we stood to create our <em>prototype</em> had to face, and were unable to overcome. </p>
 
</div>  
 
</div>  
 
<div class="col-md-3">
 
<div class="col-md-3">
Line 18: Line 19:
 
</div> </div>  
 
</div> </div>  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-3"><h3>Modernity needs the lightbulb</h3></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h3>We are compelled to seek meaning in a meaningless routine</h3></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
<p>But having done that, we are compelled to concede that what we are facing is not a problem but a paradox—the same paradox that the giants on whose shoulders we stood to create our <em>prototype</em> had to face, and were unable to overcome.
 
</p>
 
 
[[File:Giddens-OS.jpeg]]
 
[[File:Giddens-OS.jpeg]]
 
<p>In the world where we all have been socialized to "mind our own business" and <em>publish more</em>, as scientists, and as journalists, because that's what we are paid for, and what our careers and our institutions depend on—there is no established way, no institution, and not even the will to make the kind of changes that would make information once again serve the social purposes that need to be served.</p>  
 
<p>In the world where we all have been socialized to "mind our own business" and <em>publish more</em>, as scientists, and as journalists, because that's what we are paid for, and what our careers and our institutions depend on—there is no established way, no institution, and not even the will to make the kind of changes that would make information once again serve the social purposes that need to be served.</p>  
Line 29: Line 28:
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>How to change course</h4></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>We must change course</h4></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
[[File:Peccei-Future.jpeg]]
 
[[File:Peccei-Future.jpeg]]
 
<p>Based on a decade of The Club of Rome's research into the future prospects of mankind, [[Holotopia: Aurelio Peccei|Aurelio Peccei]] diagnosed that the humanity is on a collision course with nature. We take his diagnoses as a challenge, and as a natural benchmark test for our project. Can the new 'headlights' we are proposing help us "change course"? And if they can—<em>what will the new course be</em>?</p>  
 
<p>Based on a decade of The Club of Rome's research into the future prospects of mankind, [[Holotopia: Aurelio Peccei|Aurelio Peccei]] diagnosed that the humanity is on a collision course with nature. We take his diagnoses as a challenge, and as a natural benchmark test for our project. Can the new 'headlights' we are proposing help us "change course"? And if they can—<em>what will the new course be</em>?</p>  
 
</div> </div>  
 
</div> </div>  
 +
 +
<!--
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">

Revision as of 04:20, 23 March 2020

We have lost the sense of direction

Postman-meaning.jpeg

Already in the 1990, at the point when Tim Berners Lee was writing the code for the World Wide Web, the NYU communications scholar Neil Postman was warning us that our habitual massive outpouring of information has the opposite effect than the one intended—that it not only leaves us uninformed, but that it damages our very sense of meaning, our very capability to make sense.

Imagine a world where information is treated as other human-made things—where information and the ways it's handled are adapted to the core purposes that need to be served. What would information be like? By what methods, in what way and by whom would it be created? What new information formats, new kinds of information would emerge? In what way would our public informing be different? What would academic communication be like? By creating our Knowledge Federation prototype, we provided an academically coherent answer to those and various other related questions—answers that are not only described and explained, but also already implemented in actual, real-life embedded prototypes.

But having done that, we are compelled to concede that what we are facing is not a problem but a paradox—the same paradox that the giants on whose shoulders we stood to create our prototype had to face, and were unable to overcome.

Modernity2.jpg The Modernity ideogram depicts our civilization as a bus, and our way of handling information as its candle headlights.

We are compelled to seek meaning in a meaningless routine

Giddens-OS.jpeg

In the world where we all have been socialized to "mind our own business" and publish more, as scientists, and as journalists, because that's what we are paid for, and what our careers and our institutions depend on—there is no established way, no institution, and not even the will to make the kind of changes that would make information once again serve the social purposes that need to be served.

A purpose of the Holotopia prototype, which is currently under development, is to overcome that obstacle.

What would our world be like, if all our overabundant knowledge were used to give us the kind of meaning we need? And where we used this meaning, to orient our handling, of all things that matter? The goal of the Holotopia project is to answer that question not only in principle, not only on paper, but to implement it in...

We must change course

Peccei-Future.jpeg

Based on a decade of The Club of Rome's research into the future prospects of mankind, Aurelio Peccei diagnosed that the humanity is on a collision course with nature. We take his diagnoses as a challenge, and as a natural benchmark test for our project. Can the new 'headlights' we are proposing help us "change course"? And if they can—what will the new course be?