Difference between revisions of "Holotopia"

From Knowledge Federation
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<div class="page-header" ><h1>Holotopia</h1></div>
 
<div class="page-header" ><h1>Holotopia</h1></div>
 +
 +
 +
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>A different way to see</h4></div>
 +
 +
<div class="col-md-6"><p>
 +
Having proposed [[knowledge federation|<em>knowledge federation</em>]] as an approach to knowledge that answers to the contemporary needs of people and society – or metaphorically, as a 'pair of lightbulbs' that can replace our outdated 'candles' –  we are now developing the Holotopia [[prototype|<em>prototype</em>]] as a proof of concept application. </p>
 +
<p>So imagine that you have in your hand a strong electrical searchlight, which you may point at any issue or theme in order to see it in a new light, see it as a whole, see its correct shape and proportions. What issue would you point it to? What new insight would you expect to reach as result?
 +
</p>
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="col-md-3">[[File:Bussy.jpg]]<br><small><center>Modernity ideogram</center></small></div>
 +
</div>
 +
 +
 +
<div class="page-header" ><h2>Scope</h2></div>
 +
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"><h4>Owning the way to see</h4></div>
 +
 +
<div class="col-md-7"><p>
 +
We say "no thanks" to yet another report about Donald Trump's latest mischief. The [[knowledge federation|<em>knowledge federation</em>]] begins with a conscious and creative choice of the theme; and of the way in which we look at that theme. That's what this [[keyword|<em>keyword</em>]], [[scope|<em>scope</em>]], stands for. </p>
 +
<p>The [[scope|<em>scope</em>]] of Holotopia is the nature of our contemporary condition as a whole. We want to grasp what's going on in our time – in a way that empowers us to set our priorities and to act in accordance with the situation we are in.</p>
 +
<p>The task to [[knowledge federation|<em>federate</em>]] whatever data might be relevant for making us functionally informed might seem daunting. But we use [[knowledge federation|<em>knowledge federation</em>]] to make that work, and its results, <em>extremely</em> simple: We identify [[five insights|<em>five insights</em]] in five pivotal areas of interest, <em>which are alone</em> sufficient to show us our situation in a <em>completely</em> new light. </p>
 +
<p> But seeing and comprehending our situation is not the Holotopia's final end, but only its beginning. An insight is not [[knowledge federation|<em>federated</em>]] before it has become part of our collective awareness. Before it's reflected in the way we act. And most importantly – before it is reflected in the social-systemic structures that organize us in action. Which [[socialization|<em>socialize</em>]] us to see and act in a certain way. </p>
 +
<p> It is <em>that</em> change that is the Holotopia's final end.</p>
 +
<p>So you may now comprehend Holotopia as a co-creative strategy game – whose goal is to foster new awareness, new values, and a new way to be. Artists, scientists, collective intelligence activists, educational innovators... collaborate to evolve further and to <em>change</em> our [[collective mind|<em>collective mind</em>]].
 +
</p></div>
 +
</div>
 +
 +
<div class="row">
 +
  <div class="col-md-3"><h4>See</h4></div>
 +
<div class="col-md-7"><ul>
 +
<li>Bullet points </li>
 +
</ul>
 +
</div>
 +
</div>
 +
<! --
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">

Revision as of 13:09, 10 February 2020


A different way to see

Having proposed knowledge federation as an approach to knowledge that answers to the contemporary needs of people and society – or metaphorically, as a 'pair of lightbulbs' that can replace our outdated 'candles' – we are now developing the Holotopia prototype as a proof of concept application.

So imagine that you have in your hand a strong electrical searchlight, which you may point at any issue or theme in order to see it in a new light, see it as a whole, see its correct shape and proportions. What issue would you point it to? What new insight would you expect to reach as result?

Bussy.jpg
Modernity ideogram


Owning the way to see

We say "no thanks" to yet another report about Donald Trump's latest mischief. The knowledge federation begins with a conscious and creative choice of the theme; and of the way in which we look at that theme. That's what this keyword, scope, stands for.

The scope of Holotopia is the nature of our contemporary condition as a whole. We want to grasp what's going on in our time – in a way that empowers us to set our priorities and to act in accordance with the situation we are in.

The task to federate whatever data might be relevant for making us functionally informed might seem daunting. But we use knowledge federation to make that work, and its results, extremely simple: We identify five insights</em in five pivotal areas of interest, which are alone sufficient to show us our situation in a completely new light. </p> <p> But seeing and comprehending our situation is not the Holotopia's final end, but only its beginning. An insight is not federated before it has become part of our collective awareness. Before it's reflected in the way we act. And most importantly – before it is reflected in the social-systemic structures that organize us in action. Which socialize us to see and act in a certain way. </p> <p> It is that change that is the Holotopia's final end.</p> <p>So you may now comprehend Holotopia as a co-creative strategy game – whose goal is to foster new awareness, new values, and a new way to be. Artists, scientists, collective intelligence activists, educational innovators... collaborate to evolve further and to change our collective mind. </p></div> </div>

See

  • Bullet points

<! --

Beyond the utopia

<p>

As part of our initiative to foster knowledge federation as an academic field and a real-life praxis, we are developing the Holotopia prototype. </p>

<p>As a vision of a societal new order of things, the holotopia is practically realizable and yet more auspicious than the common utopias. It is realizable because we already own the knowledge needed to make it possible. It is more auspicious because the authors of common utopias either lacked the knowledge of what is possible, or conceived their visions before the possibilities we have today existed. </p>

<p>The mission of the Holotopia prototype is to share the holotopia vision and to facilitate its realization. </p>

Holotopia and knowledge federation

<p>In the spirit of knowledge federation, we offer holotopia as "the point of it all" – or technically as the circle in the information holon in which the knowledge federation prototype is the square.</p>

<p>We explain this point here by a mockup logical argument. We may interpret the "H" as "H ⇒ H", which is a tautology. But when written as "Holoscope ⇒ Holotopia", it becomes an intuitively obvious theorem – which our prototype undertakes to federate: When we liberate ourselves from our conventional or socialized ways of looking at the world, and begin to use a knowledge federation which allows us to see it holistically, then a wonderful new world, a whole world, becomes manifest and practically realizable. </p>

<p>We show that holotopia follows as soon as we begin to federate knowledge. And we show that knowledge federation is the core action that follows from the holotopia insight – and each of the specific five insights that lead to this large and basic one. The </p>

Holotopia summary.jpeg
Knowledge federation makes the holotopia manifest.

Holotopia ideogram

<p>We use the elephant as a metaphor for the emerging new social order. The point (* to be elaborated *) is that the giants have been pointing to different parts of the large and invisible thing. But – since they used the idioms of their own professions, and since we didn't have any way to put their insights together – we heard them talking about "the rope", "the fan" and "the tree trunk", and hence ignoring them. By making the holotopia manifest, we at both create a wonderful vision for the future, and provide a way in which the best ideas of our best minds can be understood, put together, and given a way to impact our reality.</p>
Holotopia ideogram.JPG
Holotopia ideogram


Holotopia's icon

<p>

To emphasize that the holotopia is evidence-based, that we are only federating knowledge, we show how each of our main insights, including the overall insight that holotopia stands for, results by federating a claim of a visionary 20th century thinker or giant. We consider the giant that corresponds to an insight to be the icon for that insight. The icon for </em>holotopia</em> is Aurelio Peccei.</p> <p>Based on a decade of The Club of Rome's research into the future prospects of mankind, Peccei was led to conclude

It is absolutely necessary to find a way to change course.

Peccei also left us the following more detailed instruction, how the course is to be changed:

Let me recapitulate what seems to me the crucial question at this point of the human venture. Man has acquired such decisive power that his future depends essentially on how he will use it. However, the business of human life has become so complicated that he is culturally unprepared even to understand his new position clearly. As a consequence, his current predicament is not only worsening but, with the accelerated tempo of events, may become decidedly catastrophic in a not too distant future. The downward trend of human fortunes can be countered and reversed only by the advent of a new humanism essentially based on and aiming at man’s cultural development, that is, a substantial improvement in human quality throughout the world.

</p>

Peccei.jpg
Aurelio Peccei
<p>

There is a natural way to change course – by providing suitable 'headlights'. As the Holotopia prototype will show, there is a way to look at the world that allow us to follow exactly the route of "new humanism", toward a "substantial improvement in human quality". </p>

Bussy.jpg
Modernity ideogram

Five insights

<p>

The task of putting together the knowledge that may illuminate a radically better future may seem daunting. We here make it simple by pointing to five insights about five pivotal issues, which are alone sufficient to manifest the elephant. We show that each of those five insights naturally leads to a complete reversal of the way in which its corresponding issue is commonly conceived of and handled. We show that each of those reversals is alone sufficient to make holotopia manifest. And that, however, those five reversals are so tightly knit together, that it is practically impossible to implement any of them without implementing all others. </p> <p>Two conclusions follow:

  • Comprehensive change may be necessary
  • Comprehensive change may be easy
</p>

See

  • Bullet points