Difference between revisions of "Power structure"

From Knowledge Federation
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<div class="page-header" > <h1>Power structure</h1> </div>
 
<div class="page-header" > <h1>Power structure</h1> </div>
  
The <em>power structure</em> models the intuitive notions "power holder" and "political enemy" in a way that points to the misuses of power, and the threats to democracy, that we the people are not yet able to see, and our "democracy" is unable to handle.
+
TBA
  
 +
<!--
 
[[File:Thesystemisus.001.jpeg]]
 
[[File:Thesystemisus.001.jpeg]]
  
To see why innovation needs to scale up to [[systemic innovation|<em>systemic innovation</em>]], imagine any of the [[systems in which we live and work<em>systems in which we live and work</em>]] (to turn Bela H. Banathy’s expression into a keyword) as a gigantic machine, comprising people and technology. Imagine yourself and all of us others as parts in that ‘machine’.
+
Imagine any of the [[Systems|<em>systems in which we live and work</em>]] (to turn Bela H. Banathy’s expression into a keyword) as a gigantic machine, comprising people and technology. Imagine yourself and all of us others as parts in that ‘machine’.
  
 
A function of a socio-technical system is to take everyone’s work as input, and turn it into socially useful effects. If in spite of the prowess of technology we are just as busy as ever – should we not take a closer look at those systems, and see if they might be wasting our time?
 
A function of a socio-technical system is to take everyone’s work as input, and turn it into socially useful effects. If in spite of the prowess of technology we are just as busy as ever – should we not take a closer look at those systems, and see if they might be wasting our time?
Line 11: Line 12:
 
And if our best efforts result in problems rather than solutions – should we not check whether ''they'' might be dysfunctional?
 
And if our best efforts result in problems rather than solutions – should we not check whether ''they'' might be dysfunctional?
  
Castells diagnosed the problem.
+
<div class="page-header" > <h3>Short description</h3> </div>
 +
 
 +
The <em>power structure</em> models the intuitive notions "power holder" and "political enemy" in a way that points to the misuses of power, and the threats to democracy, that we the people are not yet able to see, and our "democracy" is unable to handle.  
 +
 
 +
<div class="page-header" > <h3>Resolved within Holoscope</h3> </div>
  
[[File:Castells.jpeg]]
+
Text
  
Jantsch pointed to what's to be done.
+
<div class="page-header" > <h3>Reverses within Holotopia</h3> </div>
  
[[File:Jantsch-vision.jpeg]]
+
Text
  
 +
<div class="page-header" > <h3>Causes</h3> </div>
  
<div class="page-header" > <h2>See also</h2> </div>
+
Text
  
* Imagine the [[power structures|<em>power structure</em>]] as societal cancer. This [[keyword|<em>keyword</em>]] has been created to model the intuitive notions "political enemy" and "power holder".
+
<div class="page-header" > <h3>Unravels</h3> </div>
  
* In [[five insights]] you can see the other five insights, and some comments about their relationships.
+
Text
  
 
<div class="page-header" > <h2>See also</h2> </div>
 
<div class="page-header" > <h2>See also</h2> </div>

Latest revision as of 13:13, 29 October 2021

TBA