Difference between revisions of "Holotopia summary"

From Knowledge Federation
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
(27 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>Our challenge</h2></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>A challenge</h2></div>
 
<div class="col-md-6">  
 
<div class="col-md-6">  
 
<blockquote>  
 
<blockquote>  
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
<p>This diagnosis of our civilization's condition was made in 1980 by Aurerelio Peccei, The Club of Rome's founding president, based on a decade of this international think tank's research into the future prospects of mankind.</p>  
 
<p>This diagnosis of our civilization's condition was made in 1980 by Aurerelio Peccei, The Club of Rome's founding president, based on a decade of this international think tank's research into the future prospects of mankind.</p>  
<p>That "our civilization is on a collision course with nature" was at that point a scientifically fact. But the visionary scientists who established The Club of Rome saw that  the <em>roots</em> of our contemporary crisis were in a misbalanced way in which our civilization developed—where science and technology prospered at an accelerated rate, while culture and human values decayed.</p>  
+
<p>That "our civilization is on a collision course with nature" was at that point a scientifically established fact. The Club of Rome researchers looked deeper, into the <em>roots</em> of our civilization's condition—and found that a misbalanced way of evolving was its cause. It made science and technology prosper, and culture and human quality decline.</p>  
  
 
<p>On the morning of March 14, 1984, the day he passed away, Peccei dictated to his secretary from a hospital bed (as part of "Agenda for the End of the Century"):</p>
 
<p>On the morning of March 14, 1984, the day he passed away, Peccei dictated to his secretary from a hospital bed (as part of "Agenda for the End of the Century"):</p>
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>Our vision</h2></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>A vision</h2></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
<blockquote>The <em>holotopia</em> is a <em>realizable</em> vision of a future that offers <em>more</em> than Peccei called for.</blockquote>  
+
<blockquote>The <em>holotopia</em> is a <em>realizable</em> vision of a future that offers <em>more</em> than what Peccei called for.</blockquote>  
  
<p>This vision is made concrete in terms of <em>five insights</em>, which show that a <em>comprehensive improvement</em> of our condition is possible—analogous to the comprehensive wave of change that was germinating four centuries ago, when Galilei was held in house arrest:</p>  
+
<p>This vision is made concrete in terms of <em>five insights</em>, which show that a <em>comprehensive improvement</em> of our condition is possible—analogous to, and yet deeper and broader than the comprehensive wave of change that was germinating four centuries ago, when Galilei was in house arrest:</p>  
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
 
<li>In innovation (analogy with Industrial Revolution)</li>  
 
<li>In innovation (analogy with Industrial Revolution)</li>  
Line 34: Line 34:
 
<li>In values (analogy with Renaissance)</li>  
 
<li>In values (analogy with Renaissance)</li>  
 
</ul>  
 
</ul>  
 
</div> </div>
 
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>A strategy</h2></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
 
<blockquote>The <em>holotopia</em> strategy is to focus our efforts on <em>comprehensive</em> and <em>positive</em> change. </blockquote>
 
 
<p>The <em>five insights</em> show why such change may be easy—even when smaller and obviously necessary changes may be impossible.</p>
 
  
 
</div> </div>  
 
</div> </div>  
Line 50: Line 40:
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>Why this is possible</h2></div>
 
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>Why this is possible</h2></div>
<div class="col-md-7">The reason why comprehensive, Renaissance-like change is now possible is that—just as the case was in Galilei's time—it is mandated for <em>fundammental</em> reasons. In the course of our modernization we've made, namely, a fundamental error—which has been uncovered and reported, but not yet corrected. </p>  
+
<div class="col-md-7"><p>The reason why comprehensive change has become possible is that <em>fundamental</em> insights have been reached, which demand that we change the way we see and comprehend the word—as the case was in Galilei's time. </p>  
<p>In 1952, in "Physics and Philosophy", Nobel Laureate Physicist Werner Heisenberg described it as follows:</p>  
+
<p>In 1958, in "Physics and Philosophy", Nobel Laureate Physicist Werner Heisenberg described this situation as follows:</p>  
 
 
 
 
 
</div> </div>  
 
</div> </div>  
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-3">
+
<div class="col-md-3"></div>  
 
<div class="col-md-6">
 
<div class="col-md-6">
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
"[T]he nineteenth century developed an extremely rigid frame for natural science which formed not only science but also the general outlook of great masses of people. This frame (...) was so narrow and rigid that it was difficult to find a place in it for many concepts of our language that had always belonged to its very substance, for instance, the concepts of mind, of the human soul or of life. Mind could be introduced into the general picture only as a kind of mirror of the material world; and when one studied the properties of this mirror in the science of psychology, the scientists were always tempted — if I may carry the comparison further — to pay more attention to its mechanical than to its optical properties. Even there one tried to apply the concepts of classical physics, primarily that of causality. In the same way life was to be explained as a physical and chemical process, governed by natural laws, completely determined by causality. Darwin’s concept of evolution provided ample evidence for this interpretation. It was especially difficult to find in this framework room for those parts of reality that had been the object of the traditional religion and seemed now more or less only imaginary. Therefore, in those European countries in which one was wont to follow the ideas up to their extreme consequences, an open hostility of science toward religion developed, and even in the other countries there was an increasing tendency toward indifference toward such questions (...). Confidence in the scientific method and in rational thinking replaced all other safeguards of the human mind."
+
"[T]he nineteenth century developed an extremely rigid frame for natural science which formed not only science but also the general outlook of great masses of people. This frame (...) was so narrow and rigid that it was difficult to find a place in it for many concepts of our language that had always belonged to its very substance, for instance, the concepts of mind, of the human soul or of life. (...) In the same way life was to be explained as a physical and chemical process, governed by natural laws, completely determined by causality. Darwin’s concept of evolution provided ample evidence for this interpretation. It was especially difficult to find in this framework room for those parts of reality that had been the object of the traditional religion and seemed now more or less only imaginary. (...). Confidence in the scientific method and in rational thinking replaced all other safeguards of the human mind."
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
 
</div>
 
</div>
Line 68: Line 56:
 
<div class="col-md-3"></div>
 
<div class="col-md-3"></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
<p>Heisenberg's point was that the "narrow and rigid" way of looking at the world, which our general culture adopted from the 19th century science, <em>was proven wrong</em> a century later by science itself. </p>  
+
<p>Heisenberg's point was that the "narrow and rigid" way of looking at the world, which our general culture adopted from the 19th century science, <em>was proven wrong</em> a century later <em>by science itself</em>. </p>  
<blockquote>Heisenberg believed that the greatest gift of modern physics to humanity would be the <em>cultural</em> change that is mandated by it.</blockquote>
+
<blockquote>Heisenberg believed that the largest gift of modern physics to humanity would be to unleash a <em>cultural</em> change—by discrediting the worldview that keeps culture in check.</blockquote>  
<p>It took us 25 years to develop an up-to-date academic alternative to the <em>narrow frame</em>.</p>  
 
  
<p>The [[knowledge federation|<em>knowledge federation</em>]] [[prototype|<em>prototype</em>]] consists of about 40 more detailed <em>prototypes</em>, which provide all that is needed to complete the model of an academic field or paradigm—from epistemology and methods, to social processes, community and examples of application. </p>  
+
</div> </div>  
  
  
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>Our mission</h2></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>A method</h2></div>
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
<blockquote>The <em>holotopia</em> mission is to set in motion a comprehensive wave of change.</blockquote>
+
<blockquote><em>Knowledge federation</em> is a general-purpose methodology for creating knowledge, founded on the results of 20th century science and philosophy.</blockquote>
 +
<p>It provides ways to combine academic research with heritage of the world traditions, and create general insights about <em>any</em> theme of interest. </p>
 +
<blockquote>When <em>knowledge federation</em> is applied to society's pivotal issues—the <em>holotopia</em> vision results.</blockquote>
 +
 
 +
</div> </div>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>A strategy</h2></div>
 +
<div class="col-md-7">
 +
 
 +
<blockquote>The <em>holotopia</em> strategy is to focus on <em>comprehensive</em> and <em>positive</em> change. </blockquote>
 +
 
 +
<p>The <em>five insights</em> explain why comprehensive change can be easy—even when smaller and obviously necessary changes may be impossible.</p>  
  
 +
</div> </div>
  
<p>We implement this mission in two steps.</p>
 
  
The first is to institutionalize <em>knowledge federation</em> as an academic field.  
+
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>A mission</h2></div>
 +
<div class="col-md-7">
 +
<blockquote>The <em>holotopia</em> mission is to set in motion a comprehensive wave of change.</blockquote>
  
 +
<p>We implement this mission in two steps.</p>
  
The second step is to develop <em>holotopia</em> as an academic  project. 
+
<blockquote>The first step is to institutionalize <em>knowledge federation</em> as an academic field. </blockquote>
  
 +
<p>Its purpose is to divert some of the <em>academia</em>'s vast resources toward providing our society the vision it needs.</p>
  
The first step is to have the academia—the institution that has the power to do that—change the relationship we have with information; to have us see information as a means to an end, as something we need to 'show us the way'. And to create and use information accordingly. This will then give us the collective vision, the ability to see where we are headed and choose our future.
+
<blockquote>The second step is to develop <em>holotopia</em> as a real-life project. </blockquote>
  
The vision is of course necessary, but it is not sufficient. We still need a way to create those 'headlights'; and to use them to steer toward the future we chose. That is what the second step will secure.
+
<p>Its purpose is to restore the faculty of vision to people and society. </p>
  
  
Line 100: Line 106:
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li>[http://holotopia.info|<b>holotopia.info</b>] provides an overview of <em>holotopia</em> project etc.</li>
+
<li>[http://holotopia.info <b>Holotopia.info</b>] details the <em>holotopia</em> and the <em>five insights</em>.</li>
<li>[http://holoscope.info|<b>holoscope.info</b>] is a blog providing the timeline and ideas for development. The blog post "White Is the New Black" is an interview where the <em>holotopia</em> project is explained.</li>  
+
<li>[https://holoscope.info/2020/11/30/white-is-the-new-black/ <b>White Is the New Black</b>] explains the <em>holotopia</em> in the form of an interview.</li>  
 
</ul>  
 
</ul>  
  
 
</div> </div>
 
</div> </div>

Latest revision as of 15:09, 2 December 2020

H O L O T O P I A:    AN   A C T I O N A B L E    S T R A T E G Y



A challenge

"The future will either be an inspired product of a great cultural revival, or there will be no future."

This diagnosis of our civilization's condition was made in 1980 by Aurerelio Peccei, The Club of Rome's founding president, based on a decade of this international think tank's research into the future prospects of mankind.

That "our civilization is on a collision course with nature" was at that point a scientifically established fact. The Club of Rome researchers looked deeper, into the roots of our civilization's condition—and found that a misbalanced way of evolving was its cause. It made science and technology prosper, and culture and human quality decline.

On the morning of March 14, 1984, the day he passed away, Peccei dictated to his secretary from a hospital bed (as part of "Agenda for the End of the Century"):

"Human development is the most important goal."

Peccei.jpg
Aurelio Peccei

A vision

The holotopia is a realizable vision of a future that offers more than what Peccei called for.

This vision is made concrete in terms of five insights, which show that a comprehensive improvement of our condition is possible—analogous to, and yet deeper and broader than the comprehensive wave of change that was germinating four centuries ago, when Galilei was in house arrest:

  • In innovation (analogy with Industrial Revolution)
  • In communication (analogy with Copernican Revolution)
  • In foundation or epistemology (analogy with Enlightenment)
  • In method (analogy with Scientific Revolution)
  • In values (analogy with Renaissance)


Why this is possible

The reason why comprehensive change has become possible is that fundamental insights have been reached, which demand that we change the way we see and comprehend the word—as the case was in Galilei's time.

In 1958, in "Physics and Philosophy", Nobel Laureate Physicist Werner Heisenberg described this situation as follows:

"[T]he nineteenth century developed an extremely rigid frame for natural science which formed not only science but also the general outlook of great masses of people. This frame (...) was so narrow and rigid that it was difficult to find a place in it for many concepts of our language that had always belonged to its very substance, for instance, the concepts of mind, of the human soul or of life. (...) In the same way life was to be explained as a physical and chemical process, governed by natural laws, completely determined by causality. Darwin’s concept of evolution provided ample evidence for this interpretation. It was especially difficult to find in this framework room for those parts of reality that had been the object of the traditional religion and seemed now more or less only imaginary. (...). Confidence in the scientific method and in rational thinking replaced all other safeguards of the human mind."

Heisenberg's point was that the "narrow and rigid" way of looking at the world, which our general culture adopted from the 19th century science, was proven wrong a century later by science itself.

Heisenberg believed that the largest gift of modern physics to humanity would be to unleash a cultural change—by discrediting the worldview that keeps culture in check.


A method

Knowledge federation is a general-purpose methodology for creating knowledge, founded on the results of 20th century science and philosophy.

It provides ways to combine academic research with heritage of the world traditions, and create general insights about any theme of interest.

When knowledge federation is applied to society's pivotal issues—the holotopia vision results.


A strategy

The holotopia strategy is to focus on comprehensive and positive change.

The five insights explain why comprehensive change can be easy—even when smaller and obviously necessary changes may be impossible.


A mission

The holotopia mission is to set in motion a comprehensive wave of change.

We implement this mission in two steps.

The first step is to institutionalize knowledge federation as an academic field.

Its purpose is to divert some of the academia's vast resources toward providing our society the vision it needs.

The second step is to develop holotopia as a real-life project. 

Its purpose is to restore the faculty of vision to people and society.


For more information