Difference between revisions of "Holotopia: Socialized reality"
m |
m |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>Let us <em>federate</em> our culture's <em>foundations</em></h2></div> | <div class="col-md-3"><h2>Let us <em>federate</em> our culture's <em>foundations</em></h2></div> | ||
<div class="col-md-7"> | <div class="col-md-7"> | ||
| − | <p> | + | <p>Werner Kollath, Erich Jantsch, Douglas Engelbart, Werner Heisenberg and other 20th century's thinkers who saw elements of an emerging <em>paradigm</em> made their appeals to [[academia|<em>academia</em>]]. With astonishing consistency, they were ignored.</p> |
<p>It is the <em>academia</em>'s privileged social role to decide what ideas will be explored taught at universities, and given citizenship rights. The standards for right knowledge, which the <em>academia</em> upholds in our society, decide what education, public informing, and general information consumption will be like.</p> | <p>It is the <em>academia</em>'s privileged social role to decide what ideas will be explored taught at universities, and given citizenship rights. The standards for right knowledge, which the <em>academia</em> upholds in our society, decide what education, public informing, and general information consumption will be like.</p> | ||
<p>What <em>are</em> those standards? What are they based on?</p> | <p>What <em>are</em> those standards? What are they based on?</p> | ||
<p>Nobody knows!</p> | <p>Nobody knows!</p> | ||
| − | <p>The <em>foundations</em> on which truth and meaning are created in our society, and which determine our cultural <em>praxis</em>, are composed of vague notions (such as that science provides an "objectively true picture of reality") and historical prejudices | + | <p>The <em>foundations</em> on which truth and meaning are created in our society, and which determine our cultural <em>praxis</em>, are composed of vague notions (such as that science provides an "objectively true picture of reality") and historical prejudices. </p> |
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
| − | <p>During the 20th century a wealth of insights have been reached in the sciences, humanities and philosophy, which challenged or disproved the age-old beliefs | + | <p>During the 20th century a wealth of insights have been reached in the sciences, humanities and philosophy, which challenged or disproved the age-old beliefs based on which our culture's <em>foundations</em> have evolved. </p> |
| − | <p> | + | <p><em>They too</em> remained ignored!</p> |
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
| + | <p> | ||
| + | If you interpret what follows as a proposal for new <em>foundations</em>, you will be right in the old <em>paradigm</em>, but mistaken in the new one we are proposing. | ||
| + | </p> | ||
| + | <p> | ||
| + | The point here is to initiate a social process by which our <em>foundations</em> are continuously improved. Think of it as the reversal of the trials of Galilei and Socrates. This central issue is no longer decided "behind the closed door"; it is made a subject of a public process, akin to the traditional "trial by jury". </p> | ||
| + | <p>Our destination is not to only observe and describe a certain state of affaires—but to initiate a social process by which this state of affaires will be reversed. Hence everything that is said here is just <em>prototypes</em>—created to ignite this process.</p> | ||
</div> </div> | </div> </div> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
<div class="page-header" ><h2>Stories</h2></div> | <div class="page-header" ><h2>Stories</h2></div> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
| − | <div class="col-md-3"><h2>"Reality" is a | + | <div class="col-md-3"><h2>"Reality" is a myth</h2></div> |
<div class="col-md-7"> | <div class="col-md-7"> | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
| + | From the traditional culture, we've inherited a [[myth|<em>myth</em>]] incomparably more subversive than the myth of creation. This <em>myth</em> is now used as the foundation stone on which the edifice of our culture has been erected. | ||
| + | </blockquote> | ||
| + | <h3>"Correspondence with reality" cannot be verified</h3> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <!-- OLD | ||
"Correspondence with reality" cannot be verified. The very idea that what we see or experience or grasp by an "aha experience" <em>corresponds</em> to reality tends to be a product of illusion. | "Correspondence with reality" cannot be verified. The very idea that what we see or experience or grasp by an "aha experience" <em>corresponds</em> to reality tends to be a product of illusion. | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
Revision as of 10:14, 11 May 2020
Contents
H O L O T O P I A: F I V E I N S I G H T S
Socialized reality
Let us federate our culture's foundations
Werner Kollath, Erich Jantsch, Douglas Engelbart, Werner Heisenberg and other 20th century's thinkers who saw elements of an emerging paradigm made their appeals to academia. With astonishing consistency, they were ignored.
It is the academia's privileged social role to decide what ideas will be explored taught at universities, and given citizenship rights. The standards for right knowledge, which the academia upholds in our society, decide what education, public informing, and general information consumption will be like.
What are those standards? What are they based on?
Nobody knows!
The foundations on which truth and meaning are created in our society, and which determine our cultural praxis, are composed of vague notions (such as that science provides an "objectively true picture of reality") and historical prejudices.
During the 20th century a wealth of insights have been reached in the sciences, humanities and philosophy, which challenged or disproved the age-old beliefs based on which our culture's foundations have evolved.
They too remained ignored!
If you interpret what follows as a proposal for new foundations, you will be right in the old paradigm, but mistaken in the new one we are proposing.
The point here is to initiate a social process by which our foundations are continuously improved. Think of it as the reversal of the trials of Galilei and Socrates. This central issue is no longer decided "behind the closed door"; it is made a subject of a public process, akin to the traditional "trial by jury".
Our destination is not to only observe and describe a certain state of affaires—but to initiate a social process by which this state of affaires will be reversed. Hence everything that is said here is just prototypes—created to ignite this process.
Stories
"Reality" is a myth
From the traditional culture, we've inherited a myth incomparably more subversive than the myth of creation. This myth is now used as the foundation stone on which the edifice of our culture has been erected.
"Correspondence with reality" cannot be verified