Difference between revisions of "Holotopia: Convenience paradox"

From Knowledge Federation
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 7: Line 7:
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
The Renaissance liberated our ancestors from preoccupation with the afterlife, and empowered them to seek happiness here and now. The lifestyle changed, and the culture blossomed. What will the <em>next</em> "great cultural revival" be like?  
+
The Renaissance liberated our ancestors from preoccupation with the afterlife, and empowered them to seek happiness here and now. Their lifestyle changed and their culture blossomed. What will the <em>next</em> "great cultural revival" be like?  
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
  
<!-- ;)
 
 
   
 
   
<p>We are now ready to show how the methodological ideas we've developed and proposed can help us answer the Peccei's call to action directly. To have a solid foundation for doing that, we briefly summarize those methodological ideas. </p>
+
<p>We may approach the same question also from another angle. Combined together, the first four insights show that the spontaneous evolution of the academic tradition has brought it, and us with it, to a new turning point—beyond which it continues by removing from us the people the burden of the <em>narrow frame</em>, which made us misunderstand and damage culture. And by empowering us to combine whatever is relevant in human experience, from all time periods and geographical locations and cultural traditions, and create basic insights that can illuminate our evolutionary 'way'. </p>  
  
<p>The core of our proposal is "to change the relationship we have with information", from by extending what we know as "science", or "institutionalized academic tradition" which we call <em>academia</em>, to include the work with information for general, everyday use. This means two things: the creation of such information <em>and</em> the creation and use of information about information, or <em>methodology</em>. Instead of relying (only) on direct sensory experience, and having our preferences and <em>systems</em> altered by spontaneous power-related 'magnet' of <em>power structure</em>—we interpose a those two things as new element between ourselves and our choice of the 'way'. What difference will this make? </p>  
+
<p>By highlighting the trials and tribulations of Galilei and Socrates, as founding fathers of science and the <em>academia</em>, we pointed out that providing <em>knowledge</em> for "evolutionary guidance" (by liberating us from power-laden myths and from the delusion of the senses, through devotion to truth, empirical insights and rational analysis) is what the academic tradition is really all about. </p>  
  
<p>Like the [[power structures|<em>power structure</em>]], the [[convenience paradox|<em>convenience paradox</em>]] is defined as a [[pattern|<em>pattern</em>]]. Which means as an idealized way of looking. Both have a certain explanatory power, as we shall see. It is important to emphasize that they are neither <em>reified</em> as things, nor considered as absolute—just as seeing a feather fall slower than a pebble will not constitute a disproof of Newton's physics.</p>  
+
<p>To the four example results of such an undertaking, we are now adding the <em>convenience paradox</em> as fifth. Already the [[power structures|<em>power structure</em>]] insight showed how culture can be used as a medium of power-motivated <em>socialization</em>. By combining it with the <em>socialized reality</em> insight, we could see that the societal 'order of things' we've been socialized to accept as "the reality" can be just a product of <em>power structure</em>. We begin to see our <em>liberation</em> from such myths as a core political issue. The [[convenience paradox|<em>convenience paradox</em>]] insight undertakes to remove another cognitive obstacle, which is a delusion of our senses—which emphasize instant causes and effects, and obscure the long-term ones. </p>
  
<p>Both <em>patterns</em> show how our 'drive' to [[wholeness|<em>wholeness</em>]] can be diverted (by power interests, and by delusion of our senses).</p>  
+
<p>We don't seek knowledge and wisdom to orient our basic choices because we believe that we already <em>know</em> the answers, that we can experience them directly.</p>
  
<p>When we look at the world through <em>convenience</em>, we shun knowledge and wisdom as irrelevant, because we already <em>know</em> what we want. The "pursuit of happiness" then becomes a practical matter—of acquiring it. </p>  
+
<p>The <em>convenience paradox</em> insight is that convenience is a useless and deceptive value—which by <em>inhibiting</em> the development of culture, and of "human quality", hinders us from pursuing the goals and directions that are <em>the</em> most rewarding, and most germanely human!</p>  
  
<blockquote>The key insight, which we are calling <em>convenience paradox</em>, is that <em>convenience</em> is a deceptive and paradoxical value.</blockquote>
+
<blockquote>When <em>convenience paradox</em> is understood, it becomes obvious that we have indeed no clue about the life's most important and interesting question:</blockquote>  
  
<p>That with striking consistency, the more convenient <em>direction</em> tends to lead to a less convenient <em>condition</em>.</p>
+
<blockquote>What values, and what goals, are really worth pursuing?</blockquote>  
  
<p>When the <em>convenience paradox</em> is understood, we readily see that we in fact have no clue about the life's <em>important</em> question: <em>What is really good for us?</em> </p>
 
  
<blockquote>What is really worth aiming for?</blockquote>  
+
<p>Imagine a culture where the <em>convenience paradox</em> is a basic culture-supported facts, as the Newton's Laws are.</p>
  
<p>It is at that point that we begin to seek the information that illuminates basic questions. </p>  
+
<p>The <em>convenience paradox</em> insight is a beginning, not an end. Beyond it is the pursuit of knowledge, and of human cultivation—leading to a true blossoming of our potential. In no epoch before has the heritage of the world traditions been available to a single human population. And in no other epoch has this population matured epistemologically and technologically to the point of being able to take true advantage of the humanity's cultural welth.</p>  
  
<p>To counter the power of power interests and the delusion of the senses in a true <em>academic</em> way, we took recourse to <em>knowledge of knowledge</em>—and showed how a method can be built based on the epistemological state of the art, which allows us to broaden the <em>narrow frame</em>, (1) by extending the methods and the <em>language</em> of science by devising such things as <em>patterns</em>; and (2)  by exteding its information base of science to include <em>all</em> potentially relevant human experience. </p>
 
  
<p>Our point so far was that we already have the knowledge and the technology to take this sort of step. That indeed, both <em>demand</em> that we do that. We have shown how to build the 'lightbulb' from the foundation (basic principles) up.</p>  
+
<p>We should not be a single bit surprised if it turns out that a cultural change of a similar scale is ahead of us, as the change in our understanding and transforming the natural world, which science and technology have enabled for us.</p>  
  
<p>Our next task is to show that when we do that, when we change the relationship we have with information and begin to truly use it—the 'course' will change automatically, and we'll experience a cultural change of a similar scale as what science enabled us to engender in understanding the nature and in technology.</p>  
+
<blockquote>What points of reference and what sources will become relevant? What new insights will emerge?</blockquote>  
  
<p>We here illustrate this bold claim—which is of course the essential point of the <em>holotopia</em> vision—by a few examples.</p>     
+
<p>We here point to the breadth and the depth of possibilities by a few examples.</p>     
  
 +
</div> </div>
  
</div> </div>
+
<!-- XXX
  
  

Revision as of 08:30, 12 September 2020

H O L O T O P I A:    F I V E    I N S I G H T S



The Renaissance liberated our ancestors from preoccupation with the afterlife, and empowered them to seek happiness here and now. Their lifestyle changed and their culture blossomed. What will the next "great cultural revival" be like?


We may approach the same question also from another angle. Combined together, the first four insights show that the spontaneous evolution of the academic tradition has brought it, and us with it, to a new turning point—beyond which it continues by removing from us the people the burden of the narrow frame, which made us misunderstand and damage culture. And by empowering us to combine whatever is relevant in human experience, from all time periods and geographical locations and cultural traditions, and create basic insights that can illuminate our evolutionary 'way'.

By highlighting the trials and tribulations of Galilei and Socrates, as founding fathers of science and the academia, we pointed out that providing knowledge for "evolutionary guidance" (by liberating us from power-laden myths and from the delusion of the senses, through devotion to truth, empirical insights and rational analysis) is what the academic tradition is really all about.

To the four example results of such an undertaking, we are now adding the convenience paradox as fifth. Already the power structure insight showed how culture can be used as a medium of power-motivated socialization. By combining it with the socialized reality insight, we could see that the societal 'order of things' we've been socialized to accept as "the reality" can be just a product of power structure. We begin to see our liberation from such myths as a core political issue. The convenience paradox insight undertakes to remove another cognitive obstacle, which is a delusion of our senses—which emphasize instant causes and effects, and obscure the long-term ones.

We don't seek knowledge and wisdom to orient our basic choices because we believe that we already know the answers, that we can experience them directly.

The convenience paradox insight is that convenience is a useless and deceptive value—which by inhibiting the development of culture, and of "human quality", hinders us from pursuing the goals and directions that are the most rewarding, and most germanely human!

When convenience paradox is understood, it becomes obvious that we have indeed no clue about the life's most important and interesting question:
What values, and what goals, are really worth pursuing?


Imagine a culture where the convenience paradox is a basic culture-supported facts, as the Newton's Laws are.

The convenience paradox insight is a beginning, not an end. Beyond it is the pursuit of knowledge, and of human cultivation—leading to a true blossoming of our potential. In no epoch before has the heritage of the world traditions been available to a single human population. And in no other epoch has this population matured epistemologically and technologically to the point of being able to take true advantage of the humanity's cultural welth.


We should not be a single bit surprised if it turns out that a cultural change of a similar scale is ahead of us, as the change in our understanding and transforming the natural world, which science and technology have enabled for us.

What points of reference and what sources will become relevant? What new insights will emerge?

We here point to the breadth and the depth of possibilities by a few examples.