Difference between revisions of "Holotopia: Convenience paradox"

From Knowledge Federation
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 23: Line 23:
 
<blockquote>What is really worth aiming for?</blockquote>  
 
<blockquote>What is really worth aiming for?</blockquote>  
  
<p>It is at that point that we begin to explore fundamental questions. And to seek the information that illuminates them. </p>  
+
<p>It is at that point that we begin to seek the information that illuminates such basic questions. </p>  
  
<p>We have introduced the <em>holoscope</em> as an academically rigorous way to develop and use such information. </p>  
+
<p>We have introduced the <em>holoscope</em> as an academically founded method to create and use such information. </p>  
  
<p>When illuminated by the <em>holoscope</em>, our contemporary condition emerges in a completely new light. A wealth of ways to improve it come to the foreground.</p>  
+
<p>When illuminated by the <em>holoscope</em>, our contemporary condition emerges in a completely new light—and a wealth of ways to improve it come to the foreground.</p>  
  
 
<p>We here illustrate that by a few examples.</p>  
 
<p>We here illustrate that by a few examples.</p>  

Revision as of 06:57, 10 September 2020

H O L O T O P I A:    F I V E    I N S I G H T S



The Renaissance liberated our ancestors from preoccupation with the afterlife, and empowered them to seek happiness here and now. The lifestyle changed, and the culture blossomed. What will the next "great cultural revival" be like?


From scraps of 19th century science, our ancestors concocted a narrow frame—a "rigid and narrow" way to look at the world, which made us misunderstand and damage culture. Convenience—which identifies happiness with acquiring and experiencing what feels attractive—is a case in point.

When we look at the world through convenience, we shun knowledge and wisdom as irrelevant, because we already know what we want. The "pursuit of happiness" then becomes a practical matter—of acquiring it.

The key insight, which we are calling convenience paradox, is that convenience is a deceptive and paradoxical value.

That with striking consistency, the more convenient direction tends to lead to a less convenient condition.

When the convenience paradox is understood, we readily see that we in fact have no clue about the life's important question: What is really good for us ?

What is really worth aiming for?

It is at that point that we begin to seek the information that illuminates such basic questions.

We have introduced the holoscope as an academically founded method to create and use such information.

When illuminated by the holoscope, our contemporary condition emerges in a completely new light—and a wealth of ways to improve it come to the foreground.

We here illustrate that by a few examples.