Difference between revisions of "Holotopia: Convenience paradox"

From Knowledge Federation
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 11: Line 11:
 
   
 
   
  
<p>The <em>narrow frame</em> insight shows that from scraps of 19th century science, our general culture improvised a "narrow and rigid" way to look at the world, which made us misinterpret our cultural heritage—and abandon the <em>creation</em> of culture to power interests. The value of <em>convenience</em> is a case in point. </p>  
+
<p>From scraps of the 19th century science, the <em>narrow frame</em> insight showed, our ancestors improvised a "narrow and rigid" way to look at the world, which was damaging to culture. <em>Convenience</em>—the "pursuit of happiness" by reaching out for what <em>feels</em> attractive—is a case in point. </p>
 +
 
 +
<p>When we look at the world through <em>convenience</em> ('in the light of a candle'), the <em>order of things</em> we are in might easily appear as the best possible world. But as soon as we realize that <em>convenience</em> is a deceptive and useless "value"—we also realize that we indeed have very little clue about what is <em>really</em> "good for us".</p>
 +
 
 +
<blockquote><em>Enormous</em> possibilities for both revising and improving our condition become visible.</blockquote>
 +
 
 +
<p>Which we will here only illustrate.</p>  
  
 
<!-- ;)
 
<!-- ;)

Revision as of 10:20, 6 September 2020

H O L O T O P I A:    F I V E    I N S I G H T S



The Renaissance liberated our ancestors from preoccupation with the afterlife, and empowered them to seek happiness here and now. The lifestyle changed, and the culture blossomed. What will the next "great cultural revival" be like?


From scraps of the 19th century science, the narrow frame insight showed, our ancestors improvised a "narrow and rigid" way to look at the world, which was damaging to culture. Convenience—the "pursuit of happiness" by reaching out for what feels attractive—is a case in point.

When we look at the world through convenience ('in the light of a candle'), the order of things we are in might easily appear as the best possible world. But as soon as we realize that convenience is a deceptive and useless "value"—we also realize that we indeed have very little clue about what is really "good for us".

Enormous possibilities for both revising and improving our condition become visible.

Which we will here only illustrate.