Difference between revisions of "Holotopia: Convenience paradox"

From Knowledge Federation
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 45: Line 45:
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<div class="col-md-7">
 
<p>Imagine now another experiment: A civilization, living perhaps on some faraway island, developed the alternative—non-violence, love... but not technology. Imagine our civilization discovered them. What would happen?</p>   
 
<p>Imagine now another experiment: A civilization, living perhaps on some faraway island, developed the alternative—non-violence, love... but not technology. Imagine our civilization discovered them. What would happen?</p>   
 +
 +
Kanyini – hear him explain it.
 +
 +
https://youtu.be/6GdB1g5tG38
 
</div> </div>  
 
</div> </div>  
  

Revision as of 01:43, 5 September 2020

H O L O T O P I A:    F I V E    I N S I G H T S



The Renaissance liberated our ancestors from preoccupation with the afterlife, and empowered them to seek happiness here and now. The lifestyle changed, and the culture blossomed. How could the next such change begin?

As long as we are mistaking convenience for happiness or wholeness—the order of things we are living may appear as the best possible one. When, however, the convenience paradox is understood, we become ready to ask:

  • What has civilization done to us?
  • How can we live better?

The convenience paradox insight ends the reification of the way we experience things—and opens up a vast frontier where we create the way we experience things. It's a whole new way to "pursue happiness".