Difference between revisions of "Five insights"

From Knowledge Federation
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 10: Line 10:
 
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''Insight'''
 
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''Insight'''
 
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''Domain'''
 
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''Domain'''
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''Conversion'''
+
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''Reversal'''
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''Cause of'''
+
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''Causes'''
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''Enabler of'''
+
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''Enables'''
 
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''Source'''
 
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''Source'''
 +
|-
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''PS'''
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  [[Power structure insight|Power structure]]
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  Issues
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  [[Conversion from problems approach to systems approach|Problems approach ➲ systems approach]]
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  [[Problems approach as a cause of the myth of objectivity|Problems approach ➡︎ objectivity]]
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  [[Systems approach as an enabler of polyscopy|Systems approach ➯ polyscopy]]
 +
| style="padding: 10px" |  Systems science, political science
 
|-
 
|-
 
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''SR'''
 
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''SR'''
Line 46: Line 54:
 
| style="padding: 10px" |  [[Federation as an enabler of design|Federation ➯ design]]
 
| style="padding: 10px" |  [[Federation as an enabler of design|Federation ➯ design]]
 
| style="padding: 10px" |  Computer science
 
| style="padding: 10px" |  Computer science
|-
 
| style="padding: 10px" |  '''PS'''
 
| style="padding: 10px" |  [[Power structure insight|Power structure]]
 
| style="padding: 10px" |  Issues
 
| style="padding: 10px" |  [[Conversion from problems approach to systems approach|Problems approach ➲ systems approach]]
 
| style="padding: 10px" |  [[Problems approach as a cause of the myth of objectivity|Problems approach ➡︎ objectivity]]
 
| style="padding: 10px" |  [[Systems approach as an enabler of polyscopy|Systems approach ➯ polyscopy]]
 
| style="padding: 10px" |  Systems science, political science
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
<div class="page-header" > <h2>See also</h2> </div>
 
<div class="page-header" > <h2>See also</h2> </div>
  
 +
* [[Power structure|<em>Power structure</em>]]
 +
* [[Collective mind|<em>Collective mind</em>]]
 
* [[Socialized reality|<em>Socialized reality</em>]]
 
* [[Socialized reality|<em>Socialized reality</em>]]
 
* [[Narrow frame|<em>Narrow frame</em>]]
 
* [[Narrow frame|<em>Narrow frame</em>]]
 
* [[Convenience paradox|<em>Convenience paradox</em>]]
 
* [[Convenience paradox|<em>Convenience paradox</em>]]
* [[Collective mind|<em>Collective mind</em>]]
 
* [[Power structure|<em>Power structure</em>]]
 

Revision as of 15:14, 9 February 2020

We are presently editing these descriptions of the five insights – which we've found sufficient to bring across the overarching insight that holotopia stands for – that a comprehensive change might be easy; and that an Enlightenment-like development is ready to take place.

FiveInsights.JPG

FIVE INSIGHTS
Acr Insight Domain Reversal Causes Enables Source
PS Power structure Issues Problems approach ➲ systems approach Problems approach ➡︎ objectivity Systems approach ➯ polyscopy Systems science, political science
SR Socialized reality Epistemology Objectivity ➲ design Objectivity ➡︎ tradition Design ➯ wholeness Cognitive science, sociology
NF Narrow frame Worldview Tradition ➲ polyscopy Tradition ➡︎ convenience Polyscopy ➯ federation Science, philosophy
CP Convenience paradox Values Convenience ➲ wholeness Convenience ➡︎ broadcasting Wholeness ➯ systems approach World cultures
CM Collective mind Communication Broadcasting ➲ federation Broadcasting ➡︎ problems approach Federation ➯ design Computer science