APPLICATIONS

From Knowledge Federation
Revision as of 14:55, 19 August 2018 by Dino (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


A roadmap of an emerging creative frontier

Domain Map.jpg
A placeholder for the knowledge federation domain map

Think again about the development of science – as the development of research labs, experiments, theories... Think now about a similar development today – but of an approach to knowledge that can provide us the necessary (evolutionary) guidance, to manage the complex world and evolve further. What would this new frontier consist of? What might we need to do to put such an approach to knowledge into actual practice? What methods, what practices might it require? What follows is a prototype answer.

How to read this page

Another metaphor might be useful: Imagine that we are in 1848 in California, and that we've discovered that there's gold to be mined. But we are here and now, and the 'gold' to be mined is something that can benefit the humanity in an unordinarily large way. And so instead of digging a hole in the ground and beginning to excavate gold, we created a (prototype) railroad, and a school and a hospital... so that lots of people can join us for contribution and benefit.

There are subtle interconnections between these prototypes. Think about knowledge federation and systemic innovation as emerging fields and frontiers – how can we support them through education? What else may be needed so that systemic innovation can become whole, and functional... This is the thought process that guided us in creating this, we believe, sufficiently complete portfolio.

We will present this portfolio as a domain map

While waiting for our domain map to be completed (it is currently a theme of a research project) we list our prototypes linearly, beginning from the more technical or "hard", and ending with the most conceptual or "soft". (A domain map is one of the key tools of knowledge federation, a variant of Engelbart's DKR (or "dynamic knowledge repository"). The idea is that a community in charge of a domain should display its domain using a system of maps, that (similarly as the geographical maps) reflect distinct purposes, levels of detail etc.


Prototypes

How can we give knowledge real-life impact? How can we change real-life systems? How can we create institutions that are capable of evolving to reflect the present state of our knowledge, and our needs?

We create prototypes – real-life systems embedded in reality, acting upon reality and aiming to change it. The prototypes serve as

  • models – because they embody design ideas and solutions in a manner that makes them applicable and adaptable to other situations
  • experiments – because being embedded in reality they allow us to see what works and what doesn't
  • interventions – strategically deployed to transform systems, and to point to a new direction

By putting a prototype in charge of a transdisciplinary community, to update it continuously, the prototypes are at the same time conceived as a core tool of knowledge federation.


Knowledge media

By "knowledge media" we mean tools and processes that enable knowledge federation. Knowledge Federation originated as a community of knowledge media researchers and developers, as a place where we can exchange ideas and develop a body of knowledge, analogous to physics and chemistry. And where we may also team up with other people and communities, for real-world knowledge-work system development and impact.

This line of our work perhaps most directly continues the line of work that Doug Engelbart initiated.

The following are some examples of knowledge media systems developed by the members of our community.

Meme Media and Webbles

.

YandD.jpg

Yuzuru Tanaka and Douglas Engelbart in Engelbart's home in California in 2012, a year before Engelbart passed away. Decades earlier, when their collaboration and friendship began, meeting Tanaka helped Doug heal his WW2 prejudices toward the Japanese.

How to best manifest the Web's potential to vastly enhance the evolution of knowledge, by combining the already existing pieces (or memes)? The Meme Media and the Webbles are envisioned as a prototype answer, including both a methodology and a toolkit. Both have been developed at the Knowledge Media Laboratory of the University of Hokkaido, Japan, under the leadership of Professor Yuzuru Tanaka. Tanaka was the first to use the term "knowledge federation" in the way in which we are using it.

See

Debategraph

How to enable a global community of interest to organize together the documents and points of view relevant to their domain – and reach insights and conclusions? Debategraph is a premier system for online knowledge federation, with 25000 maps covering a broad variety of issues, created by CNN, the White House, the UK Prime Minister's Office, The Independent, and the Foreign Office among others. Co-founded by Peter Baldwin and David Price, who have been collaborating on DebateGraph's development on opposites sides of the world for over a decade, Debategraph is evolving continuously towards the fulfilment of its long term vision "for a new medium of public deliberation, communication and conflict resolution".

See

Knowledge Gardening and TopicQuests

Engelbart's core idea (what he called CoDIAK and what we are calling the collective mind) is that when people are able to directly interact with the computers, and when the computers are linked into a network, then the people around the globe can think and work together in entirely new ways, well beyond even what sitting in the same room could make possible (he developed the familiar technology to enable that development). Developed by Jack Park and his team, and building on Doug's idea of the DKR, the Knowledge Gardening and TopicQuests are again a combination of a suitable methodology and enabling set of technologies. In 2007 Jack Park initiated the development of the Knowledge Federation community.

See

Induct

Henry Chesbrough of UC Berkeley observed that innovation can be made incomparably more effective and efficient if it can become "open". Norwegian entrepreneur Alf Martin Johansen undertook to make this opportunity real. The stated goal of Induct Software (the global business that he initiated) is to "interconnect the global innovation ecosystem".

See

  • Induct website (make sure to watch the two-minute video)
  • See this brief Youtube video where Henry Chesbrough tells the story of Induct's beginning. (Chesbrough is now the leader of Induct's Advisory Board.)

Liquid and Author

A systematic application of Engelbart's ideas to text authoring (...) Developed by Norwegian-British designer Frode Hegland. See

CollaboFramework

Imagine people sitting around a table. Their task is to co-create a system, their own system, in an entirely new way. They want to be creative in a new way. Imagine a collection of Lego blocks? What are the pieces? CollaboScience is a research prototype of this most timely knowledge media technology. Developed by Sasha and Siniša Rudan.

See

  • CollaboFramework description. This description was created for a specific application – a workshop where the participants of the first Digital Humanities in the North conference were invited to re-create their own collaboration or system, according to the collective mind paradigm.
  • This blog post report of the Digital Humanities in the North event.


Science

The traditional science has a record of successes in its traditional pursuits. Our prototypes below will show that substantial improvements are possible in all the rest – and above all in the federation (interpretation, aggregation, interconnection...) of the results in science, and their use to inform people's understanding of core issues.

Knowledge Federation

The core function of this prototype is to add to the academic repertoire a core capability – to evolve its own systems. Knowledge Federation defines itself as the transdiscipline for knowledge federation – which means, among other things, that Knowledge Federation develops the transdiscipline model by developing itself.

See

Tesla and the Nature of Creativity 2015

Imagine that a scientist developed a result of very high general interest, and of high potential impact in several fields of science – and wrote an article about it in the technical language of quantum physics. This situation presented itself in reality, and we took advantage of it to develop a complete federation prototype for this type of applications. The prototype has three phases: (1) through collaboration with our communication design team, the article is turned into a multimedia object where the high-level module presents the result in an accessible language of metaphorical diagrams, equipped with recorded interviews with the author to explain the details, and links into the article and the technical details; (2) the second phase placed this result into public awareness, through a high-profile public event and the use of an orchestra of new media; (3) the main ideas are placed online into a Debategraph map, linked with other related ideas, and made available for further elaboration.

By adding "Part One" to the title of the long blog post that explains this project as a technical knowledge federation prototype (see the link below) we created a private joke, which requires explanation. What might the other two parts be (we will probably never write them as blog posts)? They both have to do with the emerging larger paradigm. One of them is about the foundations for truth and meaning. If you recall Heisenberg from Federation through Images, then you are aware of the challenge – our foundation is too narrow... It turns out that there are two ways to broaden it. One of them is what's been pursued here – to create a methodology and social processes etc. The other one is to include the findings of quantum physics into the modeling repertoire of conventional science. This project combines both of them – and in an academically interesting way (...). And now the the other, third part. It's about creativity. Imagine if – because of the mentioned "narrow foundation", we completely misunderstood the nature of creativity. And if we created a research culture, and education, accordingly (...).

See

The Paradigm Strategy poster

How can we connect scientific findings from a variety of fields (in the particular case mostly in the humanities) – and bring them to bear upon our understanding of our condition; and to show the origins and the way to the paradigm that wants to emerge? We'll discuss this poster in more detail in Federation through Conversation, where it will be introduced as a conversation starter. So for now we'll just show it to you and let you explore it for a moment on your own.

See

Leadership and Systemic Innovation ISSS SIG

We are here talking about a core challenge – establishing systemic innovation academically and in real life, in such a way that it is rooted in the indispensable heritage of the systems sciences. Please notice why Knowledge Federation could not call itself "the transdiscipline for systemic innovation" – the best use of our expertise and professional ethos is to federate the knowledge of the systems scientists properly... Notice why could not, and did not, ignore this heritage. And so Alexander (Laszlo, as the board member of the International Society for the Systems Sciences, the largest global organization of systems scientists) asked the ISSS board to authorize this collaboration between our two communities (the purpose of which would be to co-evolve their own system). They answered "We are not interested", but "you have your SIG and you can do in it whatever you want." And so this SIG became an embryo of a most timely academic enterprise (...).

This SIG, which evolved over the years under the leadership of Alexander Laszlo, is conceived as a systems lab where new systemic solutions are developed with and for the systems community.

See

The Lighthouse

Lighthouse2.jpg

The Lighthouse initial team, exiting from the ISSS59 conference in Berlin, where the Wiener's paradox was presented, and the Lighthouse 'rescue team' was formed.

With The Lighthouse prototype comes with another really basic academic use case scenario: Imagine that an entire discipline, or academic community, has a message to the world, which we the people somehow just haven't grasped yet. Imagine that this message is, furthermore, essential for understanding and applying in practice all the other knowledge produced by the community. Imagine, to put it more simply, that the people haven't grasped why and for what purposes the knowledge produced by the community should be used. Once again, of course, we are talking about a real situation – and that's the situation of the systems science community. The nature of which, by the way, this community has no difficulty recognizing.

(You will have no difficulty noticing that we are here talking about an insight or a meme that is central for the larger emerging paradigm.)

Just a note about the name of this prototype. Imagine the systems science and community as an island or a continent. Imagine the stray ships sailing the rough seas of modernity, trying to resolve global issues, make the world work for all... Then you may imagine Lighthouse as way to show those ships the way to the safety of a harbor, on a continent where directional insights and solutions, and new and safer 'boat designes' are forged in a solidly academic way.

Technically, this prototype shows how an academic community may federate its core insight or insights into the larger community

See

  • Hermes prototype preceded The LIghthouse (see this detailed description on Debategraph – we rendered it in this way to make it available for further commenting and elaboration
  • Wiener's paradox is a result, presented to the systems community, to show that the very first and most basic insight has not yet been communicated from the community to the world. In the larger picture, we use Wiener's paradox as a keyword and a metaphor for the situation in which academic research now finds itself in general.
  • The Lighthouse talk abstract and slides

Polyscopy

Text

See

  • Bullet item


Education

What might education need to be to support our transition into the emerging paradigm? How might we best intervene into education, to facilitate that change? Then think about education in the context of knowledge federation and systemic innovation – think about all the work that needs to be done to federate global knowledge resources; think of all the work that is being done by students... Can we combine those two – and have students do actually useful work, can we integrate learning and knowledge work, so that they are in synergy with one another? Think, finally, about facilitating the development of knowledge federation and systemic innovation globally, through education – physics has its education, and so does chemistry and mathematics... But what about us? Or more generally – what might education need to be like for any new body of knowledge? How can we create this body of knowledge? How can we teach it?

Collaborology

Text

See

  • Bullet item

Leadership and Systemic Innovation

Text

See

  • Bullet item

Algorithms and Complexity

Text

See

  • Bullet item

Movement and Qi

Text

See

  • Bullet item


</div> </div>


Boundary objects


Journalism (public informing)n

Text


Health and healthcare

Text


World problematique

The world problematique is a term coined by The Club of Rome at their first meeting in 1968, to point to their subject of focus – which is the world condition, which includes all the problems together. The point is that they are all related. We turn this strategy into the development of solutionatique – by practicing systemic change!

The Game-Changing Game

TheGCG.jpg

Choose your achievement, or contribution! This image was shared as part of the announcement of the first presentation of The Game-Changing Game at the SF Bay Area Future Salon in Palo Alto.

Text

See

  • Bullet item

The Club of Zagreb

Text

See

  • Bullet item


Design

Text


Art

Text


Community gestalt change

Text

The Paradigm Strategy poster and dialog

Text

See

  • Bullet item

The Key Point Dialog

Text

See

  • Bullet item


Books and publishing

The book is, we believe, here to stay. It's a great physical thing to put into a backpack and have on a mountain hike, for example. Books invite reflection. We anticipate, however, that the book will no longer be the container of information. So what will be its role – in an overall knowledge ecosystem? And most interesting for us – in what might be the role of the book as medium synergize with other media to facilitate the larger, societal paradigm shift?

Liberation

Text

See

  • Bullet item

Systemic Innovation

Text

See


Values, spirituality and religion

Text


Methodology

Text


Concept definitions

This may seem like a small matter - but...