Difference between revisions of "APPLICATIONS"

From Knowledge Federation
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<div class="page-header" > <h1>Federation through Applications</h1> </div>
 
<div class="page-header" > <h1>Federation through Applications</h1> </div>
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
−
<div class="col-md-3"><h2 style="color:red">Reflection</h2></div>
+
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>Prospecting a creative frontier</h2></div>
−
<div class="col-md-7"><h3>The future has already begun</h3>
+
<div class="col-md-7"><h3>Prototyping the lightbulb</h3>
−
<p>Imagine a world where the university decided to step into its traditional role of ensuring that good knowledge and good culture prevails – by
+
<p>From our portfolio of applications we select and show a representative sample. Our intention is not to survey or to inform, but to illustrate an emerging [[paradigm|<em>paradigm</em>]] – first of all the practical difference it can make (as suggested on the front page by the bus with candle headlights metaphor, and our four main keywords). And then also by demonstrating the breadth and depth of possible creative achievements – which will justify us in calling this an <em>academic</em> paradigm. </p>
−
<p>Imagine a world where the academic research is not so much focused on increasing academic "productivity", by more or less automating it by disciplinary procedures (which is so flagrantly Industrial Age-like, isn't it?). Imagine if the university would also provide a home to people who want to be creative in the manner of guiding our society's evolution; enhancing our society's ability to self-organize, change course... create both new forms of knowledge, and whole new <em>ways</em> of being creative.</p>
+
<p>While illustrating the depth and breadth of the creative field, we also emphasize its coherence and unity. Each of the [[prototypes|<em>prototypes</em>]] will illustrate the lavishly large benefits that can result – in its specific field – from the <em>systemic</em> approach to creative work we called [[systemic innovation|<em>systemic innovation</em>]] and [[knowledge federation|<em>knowledge federation</em>]]. No less important is the way how different design ideas synergize with one another and form a coherently functioning whole.</p>
−
<p>What would this be like?</p>
+
<p>This presentation will begin with the most practical and applied applications, and add with the ones that are more academic or methodological.</p>
 +
</div></div>
 +
-------
 +
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>These applications are prototypes</h2></div>
 +
<div class="col-md-7"><h3>Prototypes as a knowledge federation technique<h3>
 +
<p>Think about our core challenge – to bring relevant and transformative ideas from a multiplicity of fields together, and have them bear upon institutional and other <em>systemic</em> solutions, in real-life practice. How can this be achieved?</p>
 +
<p>The [[prototypes|<em>prototypes</em>]] are innovative systemic solutions implemented in practice, and strategically embedded in practice, aiming to change it.</p>
 +
<p>By putting the [[prototypes|<em>prototype</em>]] in charge of a transdisciplinary community (which we call a [[transdiscipline|<em>transdiscipline</em>]]) to create it and update it continuously, we secure that the state of the art knowledge from relevant fields has a way to impact the design of the prototype, and vice-versa – that the challenges encountered in this design have a way of becoming challenges to pertinent academic and other creative communities. </p>
 +
<p>In the [[paradigm|<em>paradigm</em>]] we are presenting, the [[prototypes|<em>prototypes</em>]] play the role of (1) models (because they embody design ideas and solutions in a way that makes them easy to adapt to other creative tasks and situations), (2) interventions (into real-life systems and situations) and (3) experiments (because they allow us to see what works and what needs to be improved).</p>
 +
<p>The [[prototypes|<em>prototypes</em>]] together form a single overarching [[prototypes|<em>prototype</em>]], the [[knowledge federation|<em>knowledge federation</em>]] – for which the Knowledge Federation is the prototype [[transdiscipline|<em>transdiscipline</em>]]. </p>
 +
</div></div>
 +
-----
 +
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>Evangelizing prototypes for systemic innovation</h2></div>
 +
  <div class="col-md-7"><h3>We may not lack the resources</h3>
 +
<p>In the 1960s Buckminster Fuller predicted that by the end of the century the science and technology would have advanced so much that we would be able to put an end to "the age of scarcity" and all the competition it entails. Did history prove him wrong?</p>
 +
<p>We show why Fuller could have been right by composing a [[threads|<em>thread</em>]] of three [[vignettes|<em>vignettes</em>]], of which the story just mentioned is the last. 
 +
The [[threads|<em>thread</em>]] begins with a [[vignettes|<em>vignette</em>]] about Charles Ferguson, mathematician - turned political scientist - turned IT entrepreneur – turned Academy Award-winning documentary filmmaker. Ferguson chose to point out (by creating two documentary films) that two recent events – the war in Iraq and the 2008 financial crisis – were caused by internal or <em>systemic</em> defects. By connecting his insight with David McCandles' Billion-Dollar-o-Gram (which visually displays the cost of large global issues), it is shown that those two issues Ferguson pointed to cost the humanity so much that "saving the Amazon" and "Lifting one billion people out of extreme poverty" would cost practically nothing in comparison.</p>
 +
<p><b>See</b>
 +
  <ul>
 +
  <li>Lecture recording [https://www.dropbox.com/s/2342lis6oqs4gg4/SI%20Positively.m4v?dl=0 Systemic Innovation Positively], where this thread begins at minute 9.</li>
 +
  <li>[http://s3.amazonaws.com/infobeautiful2/billion_dollar_gram_2009.png The Billion-Dollar-o-Gram 2009]</li>
 +
  </ul></p>
 +
<h3>A scientific approach to problems</h3>
 +
<p>If you wake up with red spots all over our skin, you will not attempt to rub them off or paint them over. Scientific medicine relies on an understanding of anatomy and physiology to treat the underlying (i.e. systemic) causes. Why not treat our <em>societal</em> ills similarly?</p>
 +
<p><b>See</b>
 +
  <ul>
 +
  <li>[https://polyscopy.wordpress.com/2013/06/05/toward-a-scientific-understanding-and-treatment-of-problems/ Toward a Scientific Understanding and Treatment of Problems] report of a workshop talk where an analogy between scientific medicine and contemporary issues is developed.</li></ul></p>
 +
</div></div>
 +
-----
 +
<div class="row">
 +
  <div class="col-md-3"><h2>Evangelizing prototypes for knowledge federation</h2></div>
 +
<div class="col-md-7"><h3>The largest contribution to knowledge</h3>
 +
<p>What is the largest contribution to human knowledge you may imagine?</p>
 +
<p>We asked this question in an evangelizing talk that was given in several occasions at the point where [[knowledge federation|<em>knowledge federation</em>]] was just beginning to take shape. Our point was to show that the contributions that are changes of social organization of knowledge work can be incomparably larger than the contributions of knowledge.</p>
 +
<p>The [[vignettes|<em>vignette</em>]] that carries this message is about the evolution of post-war sociology, during which this field grew about five times in the number of researchers and publications. And how sociology at the same time divided itself into a number of factions that were losing contact with each other – and of course also with the very society whose malfunctions they were expected to reveal. The "largest contribution" observation is here a generalization of a claim made by [[Pierre Bourdieu]] about sociology – and the point where he and his overseas colleague James Coleman, were attempting a re-organization. </p>
 +
<p><b>See</b>
 +
  <ul>
 +
  <li>"What is knowledge federation?" [http://folk.uio.no/dino/KF/KF.swf recording of our evangelizing talk at Trinity College Dublin], where the above argument is elaborated during the initial seven minutes</li>
 +
  <li>"Knowledge Federation as a Principle of Knowledge Organization and Sharing" [http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-552/Karabeg-Lachica-KF08.pdf article in the proceedings of the first Knowledge Federation workshop], where the case for [[knowledge federation|<em>knowledge federation</em>]] is made by first telling about the post-war evolution of sociology as a springboard story.</li>
 +
  </ul></p>
 +
<h3>Knowledge work has a flat tire</h3>
 +
<p>Academic and media publishing is like trying to speed ahead by pressing the gas pedal, in a car that has a flat tire. Our knowledge work has a systemic defect, which demands that we attend to it first.</p>
 +
<p>The concrete story, which demonstrates this issue, is about two high-profile scientists bringing contradicting views about the climate change to academic audiences and the media.</p>
 +
<p>We told this [[vignettes|<em>vignette</em>]] as a springboard story at our workshop at Stanford University in 2011, where [[knowledge federation|<em>knowledge federation</em>]] and [[systemic innovation|<em>systemic innovation</em>]] were pointed to as an emerging trend.</p>
 +
<p><b>See</b>
 +
  <ul>
 +
  <li>[[Knowledge Work Has a Flat Tire]]</li>
 +
  </ul></p>
 +
</div></div>
 +
-------
 +
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>Collective intelligence in practice</h2></div>
 +
<h3>Debategraph</h3>
 +
<p>Nobody can be as knowledgeable as all of us together!</p>
 +
<p>Debategraph is an online platform that enables people and communities to combine together knowledge and ideas that are relevant to an issue. With 25000 maps covering a broad variety of topics including some of our society's most urgent and most interesting ones, and the user community that includes the CNN, the White House, the UK Prime Minister's Office, The Independent, and the Foreign Office among others, Debategraph is successfully changing the way in which core issues are debated and understood.</p>
 +
&&Peter Baldwin, Debategraph's co-founder, was a cabinet minister in several Australian governments, until he got so tired of seeing the issues voted on without being understood. So he retired early, bought a home in Australian Highlands, and learned how to program the computer...  David Price, the other co-founder, has a doctorate from the University of Cambridge in organizational learning and environmental policy, and a similar passion as Baldwin for making knowledge count. Conveniently, the two men are on two opposite sides of the globe. Debategraph never sleeps!</p>
 +
<p><b>See</b>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li>[http://Debategraph.org Debategraph's introduction to itself]</li>
 +
</ul></p>
 +
<h3>Induct Software</h3>
 +
<p>Imagine a collectively intelligent business; or even better – an ecosystem where the business and its clients and suppliers are all linked together, and can freely co-create improvements and solutions.</p>
 +
<p>Henry Chesbrough of UC Berkeley observed that innovation can be made incomparably more effective and efficient if it can be made "open". Norwegian entrepreneur Alf Martin Johansen heard his talk while visiting Berkeley, and another talk about Web 2.0, and saw that the two ideas can be naturally combined. Induct Software – the global business venture he created – has Chesbrough as the head of its advisory board. And the ambition "to interconnect the global innovation ecosystem".</p>
 +
<p><b>See</b>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li>[http://www.inductsoftware.com Induct website] (make sure to watch the two-minute video)</li>
 +
<li>See [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5cP3NFcmFw this brief Youtube video] where Henry Chesbrough tells the story of Induct's beginning. (Chesbrough is now the leader of Induct's Advisory Board.)
 +
</ul></p>
 +
</div></div>
 +
-------
 +
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>Enhancing the evolution</h2></div>
 +
 
 +
<div class="col-md-7"><h3>Meme Media and Webbles</h3>
 +
<p>Combining memes</p>
 +
 
 +
<div class="col-md-7"><h3>Jack stuff</h3>
 +
<p>Thinking together</p>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
</div></div>
 +
 
 +
-------
 +
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>Empowering the young</h2></div>
 +
 
 +
<div class="col-md-7"><h3>The Game-Changing Game</h3>
 +
<p>Text</p>
 +
 
 +
<div class="col-md-7"><h3>The Club of Zagreb</h3>
 +
<p>Text</p>
 +
 
 +
<h3>Make a career wish</h3>
 +
<p> </p>
 +
<p>[[File:TheGCG.jpg]]<br><small><center>Choose an achievement or contribution! This image was shared as part of our evangelizing talk at the SF Bay Area Future Salon in Palo Alto, in 2011.</center></small></p>
 +
<p>Imagine you met a fairy... In our presentation at the San Francisco Bay Area Future Salon, we introduced The Game-Changing Game (a method for changing real-world systems) by asking the audience to make an as audacious wish for contribution or achievement as they were able to conceive of. After everyone shared their wishes we showed how even most audacious such wishes may be fulfilled through [[systemic innovation|<em>systemic innovation</em>]]. </p>
 +
<p> </p>
 +
<p><b>See</b>
 +
  <ul>
 +
<li>[http://www.futuresalon.org/2012/07/future-salon-10th-trimtab-with-dino-karabeg-july-16-sap-palo-alto.html The Game-Changing Game announcement] on the Bay Area Future Salon website</li>
 +
  </ul></p>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
</div></div>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
-------
 +
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>Title</h2></div>
 +
 
 +
<div class="col-md-7"><h3>Subtitle</h3>
 +
<p>Text</p>
 +
 
 +
<div class="col-md-7"><h3>Subtitle</h3>
 +
<p>Text</p>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
</div></div>
 +
 
 +
-------
 +
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>Title</h2></div>
 +
 
 +
<div class="col-md-7"><h3>Subtitle</h3>
 +
<p>Text</p>
 +
 
 +
<div class="col-md-7"><h3>Subtitle</h3>
 +
<p>Text</p>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
</div></div>
 +
 
 +
-------
 +
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>Title</h2></div>
 +
 
 +
<div class="col-md-7"><h3>Subtitle</h3>
 +
<p>Text</p>
 +
 
 +
<div class="col-md-7"><h3>Subtitle</h3>
 +
<p>Text</p>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
</div></div>
 +
 
 +
-------
 +
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>Title</h2></div>
 +
 
 +
<div class="col-md-7"><h3>Subtitle</h3>
 +
<p>Text</p>
 +
 
 +
<div class="col-md-7"><h3>Subtitle</h3>
 +
<p>Text</p>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
</div></div>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<!-- OLD ***
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 
<p>The [[prototypes|<em>prototype</em>]] portfolio provided here is our [[prototypes|<em>prototype</em>]] answer. </p>
 
<p>The [[prototypes|<em>prototype</em>]] portfolio provided here is our [[prototypes|<em>prototype</em>]] answer. </p>
 
<p>We emphasize that these are only highlights – and ask forgiveness of our members and collaborators whose work has not been included.</p>
 
<p>We emphasize that these are only highlights – and ask forgiveness of our members and collaborators whose work has not been included.</p>
Line 14: Line 178:
 
   <div class="col-md-7"><h3>Meme Media and Webbles</h3>.  
 
   <div class="col-md-7"><h3>Meme Media and Webbles</h3>.  
 
<p></p>
 
<p></p>
−
<p>[[File:YandD.jpg]]<br><small><center>Yuzuru Tanaka and Douglas Engelbart in Engelbart's home in California in 2012, a year before Engelbart passed away. Decades earlier, when their collaboration and friendship began,  meeting Tanaka helped Doug heal his WW2 prejudices toward the Japanese.</center></small></p>
+
<p>[[File:YandD.jpg]]<br><small><center>Yuzuru Tanaka and Douglas Engelbart in Engelbart's home in California in 2012, a year before Engelbart passed away. This friendship helped helped Engelbart heal his WW2 misgivings toward the Japanese.</center></small></p>
 
<p></p>
 
<p></p>
−
<p>Imagine if knowledge were not contained (only) in traditional books and articles on the one side, and in films and records and such on another – but in reconfigurable hypermedia, which one could cut and paste together at will and produce <em>new</em> hypermedia and new knowledge. Engelbart called the technology that enables this "open hyperdocument system", and showed his own version of it in 1968. Meme Media and Webbles in effect turn the Web into an open hyperdocument system. Pieces of traditional webpages <em>and</em> also Web services can be combined together – which opens up a realm of creative opportunities. The purpose of meme media is to enhance the evolution of knowledge, by allowing "cultural genes" or "memes" to freely cross-fertilize. Yuzuru Tanaka is a still active emeritus professor at the University of Hokkaido, Japan, and the leader of the Knowledge Media Laboratory which he established.</p>
+
<p>Imagine if knowledge were not contained (only) in traditional books and articles on the one side, and in films and records and such on another – but in reconfigurable hypermedia, which one could cut and paste together at will and produce <em>new</em> hypermedia and new knowledge.</p>
 +
<p>Engelbart called the technology that enables this "open hyperdocument system", and showed his own version of it in 1968. Meme Media and Webbles in effect turn the Web into an open hyperdocument system. Pieces of traditional webpages <em>and</em> also Web services can be combined together – which opens up a realm of creative opportunities. The purpose of meme media is to enhance the evolution of knowledge, by allowing "cultural genes" or "memes" to freely cross-fertilize.</p>
 
<p><b>See</b>  
 
<p><b>See</b>  
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
Line 479: Line 644:
 
   </ul></p></div>
 
   </ul></p></div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 +
 +
******* CLIPPINGS *******
 +
 +
 +
*******
 +
 +
-------
 +
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col-md-3"><h2>Title</h2></div>
 +
 +
<div class="col-md-7"><h3>Subtitle</h3>
 +
<p>Text</p>
 +
 +
<div class="col-md-7"><h3>Subtitle</h3>
 +
<p>Text</p>
 +
 +
 +
</div></div>
 +
 +
 +
*******

Revision as of 10:59, 29 October 2018

Contents

Federation through Applications

Prospecting a creative frontier

Prototyping the lightbulb

From our portfolio of applications we select and show a representative sample. Our intention is not to survey or to inform, but to illustrate an emerging paradigm – first of all the practical difference it can make (as suggested on the front page by the bus with candle headlights metaphor, and our four main keywords). And then also by demonstrating the breadth and depth of possible creative achievements – which will justify us in calling this an academic paradigm.

While illustrating the depth and breadth of the creative field, we also emphasize its coherence and unity. Each of the prototypes will illustrate the lavishly large benefits that can result – in its specific field – from the systemic approach to creative work we called systemic innovation and knowledge federation. No less important is the way how different design ideas synergize with one another and form a coherently functioning whole.

This presentation will begin with the most practical and applied applications, and add with the ones that are more academic or methodological.

These applications are prototypes

Prototypes as a knowledge federation technique<h3>

Think about our core challenge – to bring relevant and transformative ideas from a multiplicity of fields together, and have them bear upon institutional and other systemic solutions, in real-life practice. How can this be achieved?

The prototypes are innovative systemic solutions implemented in practice, and strategically embedded in practice, aiming to change it.

By putting the prototype in charge of a transdisciplinary community (which we call a transdiscipline) to create it and update it continuously, we secure that the state of the art knowledge from relevant fields has a way to impact the design of the prototype, and vice-versa – that the challenges encountered in this design have a way of becoming challenges to pertinent academic and other creative communities.

In the paradigm we are presenting, the prototypes play the role of (1) models (because they embody design ideas and solutions in a way that makes them easy to adapt to other creative tasks and situations), (2) interventions (into real-life systems and situations) and (3) experiments (because they allow us to see what works and what needs to be improved).

The prototypes together form a single overarching prototype, the knowledge federation – for which the Knowledge Federation is the prototype transdiscipline.

</div></div>

Evangelizing prototypes for systemic innovation

<h3>We may not lack the resources</h3>

In the 1960s Buckminster Fuller predicted that by the end of the century the science and technology would have advanced so much that we would be able to put an end to "the age of scarcity" and all the competition it entails. Did history prove him wrong?

We show why Fuller could have been right by composing a thread of three vignettes, of which the story just mentioned is the last. The thread begins with a vignette about Charles Ferguson, mathematician - turned political scientist - turned IT entrepreneur – turned Academy Award-winning documentary filmmaker. Ferguson chose to point out (by creating two documentary films) that two recent events – the war in Iraq and the 2008 financial crisis – were caused by internal or systemic defects. By connecting his insight with David McCandles' Billion-Dollar-o-Gram (which visually displays the cost of large global issues), it is shown that those two issues Ferguson pointed to cost the humanity so much that "saving the Amazon" and "Lifting one billion people out of extreme poverty" would cost practically nothing in comparison.

See

<h3>A scientific approach to problems</h3>

If you wake up with red spots all over our skin, you will not attempt to rub them off or paint them over. Scientific medicine relies on an understanding of anatomy and physiology to treat the underlying (i.e. systemic) causes. Why not treat our societal ills similarly?

See

Evangelizing prototypes for knowledge federation

<h3>The largest contribution to knowledge</h3>

What is the largest contribution to human knowledge you may imagine?

We asked this question in an evangelizing talk that was given in several occasions at the point where knowledge federation was just beginning to take shape. Our point was to show that the contributions that are changes of social organization of knowledge work can be incomparably larger than the contributions of knowledge.

The vignette that carries this message is about the evolution of post-war sociology, during which this field grew about five times in the number of researchers and publications. And how sociology at the same time divided itself into a number of factions that were losing contact with each other – and of course also with the very society whose malfunctions they were expected to reveal. The "largest contribution" observation is here a generalization of a claim made by Pierre Bourdieu about sociology – and the point where he and his overseas colleague James Coleman, were attempting a re-organization.

See

<h3>Knowledge work has a flat tire</h3>

Academic and media publishing is like trying to speed ahead by pressing the gas pedal, in a car that has a flat tire. Our knowledge work has a systemic defect, which demands that we attend to it first.

The concrete story, which demonstrates this issue, is about two high-profile scientists bringing contradicting views about the climate change to academic audiences and the media.

We told this vignette as a springboard story at our workshop at Stanford University in 2011, where knowledge federation and systemic innovation were pointed to as an emerging trend.

See

Collective intelligence in practice

<h3>Debategraph</h3>

Nobody can be as knowledgeable as all of us together!

Debategraph is an online platform that enables people and communities to combine together knowledge and ideas that are relevant to an issue. With 25000 maps covering a broad variety of topics including some of our society's most urgent and most interesting ones, and the user community that includes the CNN, the White House, the UK Prime Minister's Office, The Independent, and the Foreign Office among others, Debategraph is successfully changing the way in which core issues are debated and understood.

&&Peter Baldwin, Debategraph's co-founder, was a cabinet minister in several Australian governments, until he got so tired of seeing the issues voted on without being understood. So he retired early, bought a home in Australian Highlands, and learned how to program the computer... David Price, the other co-founder, has a doctorate from the University of Cambridge in organizational learning and environmental policy, and a similar passion as Baldwin for making knowledge count. Conveniently, the two men are on two opposite sides of the globe. Debategraph never sleeps!</p>

See

<h3>Induct Software</h3>

Imagine a collectively intelligent business; or even better – an ecosystem where the business and its clients and suppliers are all linked together, and can freely co-create improvements and solutions.

Henry Chesbrough of UC Berkeley observed that innovation can be made incomparably more effective and efficient if it can be made "open". Norwegian entrepreneur Alf Martin Johansen heard his talk while visiting Berkeley, and another talk about Web 2.0, and saw that the two ideas can be naturally combined. Induct Software – the global business venture he created – has Chesbrough as the head of its advisory board. And the ambition "to interconnect the global innovation ecosystem".

See

  • Induct website (make sure to watch the two-minute video)
  • See this brief Youtube video where Henry Chesbrough tells the story of Induct's beginning. (Chesbrough is now the leader of Induct's Advisory Board.)

</div>

Enhancing the evolution

<h3>Meme Media and Webbles</h3>

Combining memes

<h3>Jack stuff</h3>

Thinking together


Empowering the young

<h3>The Game-Changing Game</h3>

Text

<h3>The Club of Zagreb</h3>

Text

<h3>Make a career wish</h3>

TheGCG.jpg

Choose an achievement or contribution! This image was shared as part of our evangelizing talk at the SF Bay Area Future Salon in Palo Alto, in 2011.

Imagine you met a fairy... In our presentation at the San Francisco Bay Area Future Salon, we introduced The Game-Changing Game (a method for changing real-world systems) by asking the audience to make an as audacious wish for contribution or achievement as they were able to conceive of. After everyone shared their wishes we showed how even most audacious such wishes may be fulfilled through systemic innovation.

See



Title

<h3>Subtitle</h3>

Text

<h3>Subtitle</h3>

Text


Title

<h3>Subtitle</h3>

Text

<h3>Subtitle</h3>

Text


Title

<h3>Subtitle</h3>

Text

<h3>Subtitle</h3>

Text


Title

<h3>Subtitle</h3>

Text

<h3>Subtitle</h3>

Text



Retrieved from "http://kf.wikiwiki.ifi.uio.no/index.php?title=APPLICATIONS&oldid=2311"