Difference between revisions of "Holotopia"

From Knowledge Federation
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 114: Line 114:
 
<p>To highlight that the <em>knowledge federation</em> methodology we are proposing affords that very capability, in the context of the <em>holotopia</em> we refer to it by its pseudonym <em>holoscope</em>.</p>
 
<p>To highlight that the <em>knowledge federation</em> methodology we are proposing affords that very capability, in the context of the <em>holotopia</em> we refer to it by its pseudonym <em>holoscope</em>.</p>
 
<p>The characteristics of our current <em>prototype</em> of the <em>holoscope</em>—the main design choices or <em>design patterns</em>, how they follow from published insights, and why they are necessary for 'illuminating the way'—will become obvious in the course of this presentation. One characteristic, however, must be made clear from the start.</p>  
 
<p>The characteristics of our current <em>prototype</em> of the <em>holoscope</em>—the main design choices or <em>design patterns</em>, how they follow from published insights, and why they are necessary for 'illuminating the way'—will become obvious in the course of this presentation. One characteristic, however, must be made clear from the start.</p>  
 +
 +
<h3>Looking at all sides</h3>
 
<p>
 
<p>
 
[[File:Holoscope.jpeg]]<br>
 
[[File:Holoscope.jpeg]]<br>
Line 122: Line 124:
 
<p>This change of attitude becomes mandatory when our goal is not to see whether a hand-held cup is whole or cracked, but whether our 'bus' or civilization has defects that must be attended to. Then <em>a discovery of a way of looking</em> that reveals a defect, even when that defect is only a possibility, needs to be given the kind of prerogatives that scientific discoveries have in the traditional academia.</p>  
 
<p>This change of attitude becomes mandatory when our goal is not to see whether a hand-held cup is whole or cracked, but whether our 'bus' or civilization has defects that must be attended to. Then <em>a discovery of a way of looking</em> that reveals a defect, even when that defect is only a possibility, needs to be given the kind of prerogatives that scientific discoveries have in the traditional academia.</p>  
 
<p>By allowing for a multiplicity of views, we also give ignored but potentially transformative ideas 'citizenship rights'.</p>  
 
<p>By allowing for a multiplicity of views, we also give ignored but potentially transformative ideas 'citizenship rights'.</p>  
<p><em>Knowledge federation</em> can then be understood as collective thinking or sense making, whereby overarching insights ("the cup is cracked") are distilled from a multitude of data, and acted on. And as a social process that keeps a multiplicity of views coherent with one another; and of course also with academic result and other cultural artifacts; and with the people's and the society's contemporary needs.</p>  
+
<p><em>Knowledge federation</em> can now be understood as collective thinking or sense making, whereby overarching insights ("the cup is cracked") are distilled from a multitude of data, and acted on. And as a social process that keeps a multiplicity of views coherent with one another; and of course also with academic result and other cultural artifacts; and with the people's and the society's contemporary needs.</p>
 +
<p>A way of looking or <em>scope</em> that illuminates an entire whole from a specific angle is called <em>aspect</em>. As suggested by the Holoscope <em>ideogram</em>, the art of using the <em>holoscope</em> will to a large degree consist in finding a suitable collection of <em>aspects</em>—"suitable" because each of them alone affords a simple and clear view of the <em>whole</em>; and because when combined together, they show the whole from all sides, and reveal the main point, what we above all <em>need</em> to know.</p>
  
 
<h3>Thinking outside the box</h3>  
 
<h3>Thinking outside the box</h3>  
Line 133: Line 136:
 
</blockquote>  
 
</blockquote>  
  
<h3>Looking at all sides</h3>
 
 
<p>A way of looking or <em>scope</em> that illuminates an entire whole from a specific angle is called <em>aspect</em>. As suggested by the Holoscope <em>ideogram</em>, the art of using the <em>holoscope</em> will to a large degree consist in finding a suitable collection of <em>aspects</em>—"suitable" because each of them alone affords a simple and clear view of the <em>whole</em>; and because when combined together, they show the whole from all sides, and reveal the main point, what we above all <em>need</em> to know.</p> 
 
  
 
</div> </div>
 
</div> </div>
Line 147: Line 147:
 
</p>  
 
</p>  
  
<h3>A vision made concrete</h3>  
+
<h3>Illuminating problems to see solutions</h3>  
<p>The <em>holotopia</em> vision is made concrete in terms of [[Holotopia:Five insights|<em>five insights</em>]]. They are the 'engine' that 'drives' the Holotopia project to its destination.</p>  
+
<p>Suppose that you had a flexible searchlight, which you could point at any theme or issue and illuminate what remained hidden while we looked at it 'in the light of the candle' (in the habitual or <em>traditional</em> way). Your goal is to see sweepingly large possibilities for improving our condition, by "changing course"; to see how, realistically, improvements can be made on the scale that marked the Renaissance and the Enlightenment. What would you point it at? What would you see?</p>
<p>The <em>five insights</em> are the result of looking at five selected main <em>aspects</em> of our contemporary condition. Of looking beyond the apparent problems, and illuminating deeper structural defects that either created them, or prevented us from solving them. </p>
+
<p>The <em>holotopia</em> vision is made concrete in terms of a collection of five such <em>scopes</em> and <em>views</em>; or [[Holotopia:Five insights|<em>five insights</em>]].</p>  
<p>We could have also called them "five issues"—which we are proposing as completely <em>new</em> ways to direct our efforts, incomparably more effective and productive than the still common "problem solving" in the context of the <em>existing</em> systemic solutions (or metaphorically, by driving with 'candle headlights'). As we shall see, each of them is an issue that <em>can</em> be resolved.</p>  
 
  
<blockquote>Our proposal is <em>not</em> to replace the problem-based approaches—but to dramatically increase their chances to succeed.</blockquote>  
+
<p>In  the spirit of the <em>holoscope</em>, we here provide for each of them only a concise <em>high-level view</em>, a summary of its main point or points; and we present the supporting evidence and details in the corresponding detailed view or module. </p>  
<p>We might have also called them "five anomalies"—since each demands a deep or "paradigm" change in its specific domain.</p>  
 
  
<p>We shall see that each of those issues has been reported—and that the solutions have at least in principle been proposed—characteristically a half-century ago.</p>
+
<p>There we will see that not only those issues have been diagnosed, but that also solutions too have been identified and proposed—characteristically a half-century ago. We shall then also see how right Postman was, when observing that "the tie between information and action has been severed". </p>  
<p>And consequently that Postman was right in observing that "the tie between information and action has been severed". </p>  
 
  
 +
<!-- XXX
  
 
<h3><em>Power structure</em></h3>  
 
<h3><em>Power structure</em></h3>  

Revision as of 12:31, 16 July 2020

Imagine...

You are about to board a bus for a long night ride, when you notice the flickering streaks of light emanating from two wax candles, placed where the headlights of the bus are expected to be. Candles? As headlights?

Of course, the idea of candles as headlights is absurd. So why propose it? Because on a much larger scale this absurdity has become reality.

The Modernity ideogram renders the essence of our contemporary situation by depicting our society as an accelerating bus without a steering wheel, and the way we look at the world, try to comprehend and handle it as guided by a pair of candle headlights.

Modernity.jpg Modernity ideogram


Our proposal

In a nutshell

The core of our knowledge federation proposal is to change the relationship we have with information.

What is our relationship with information presently like?

Here is how Neil Postman described it:

"The tie between information and action has been severed. Information is now a commodity that can be bought and sold, or used as a form of entertainment, or worn like a garment to enhance one's status. It comes indiscriminately, directed at no one in particular, disconnected from usefulness; we are glutted with information, drowning in information, have no control over it, don't know what to do with it."

Postman.jpg
Neil Postman


In detail

What would information and our handling of information be like if we treated them as we treat other human-made things—if we adapted them to the purposes that need to be served?

The substance of our knowledge federation proposal is a complete prototype—by which the proposed modernization of information is made concrete, and practically realizable.

What consequences will knowledge federation have? How will information be different? How will it be used? By what methods, what social processes, and by whom will it be created? What new information formats will emerge, and supplement or replace the traditional books and articles? How will information technology be adapted? What will public informing be like? And academic communication, and education? The proposed prototype includes detailed answers to those and other related questions.


An application

The situation we are in

The Club of Rome's assessment of the situation we are in, provided us with a benchmark challenge for putting the proposed ideas to a test. Four decades ago—based on a decade of this global think tank's research into the future prospects of mankind, in a book titled "One Hundred Pages for the Future"—Aurelio Peccei issued the following call to action:

"It is absolutely essential to find a way to change course."

Peccei also specified what needed to be done to "change course":

"The future will either be an inspired product of a great cultural revival, or there will be no future."

Peccei.jpg
Aurelio Peccei

This conclusion, that our present crisis has cultural roots and must be handled accordingly, Peccei shared with a number of twentieth century's thinkers. Arne Næss, Norway's esteemed philosopher, reached it on different grounds, and called it "deep ecology".

In "Human Quality", Peccei explained his call to action as follows:

"Let me recapitulate what seems to me the crucial question at this point of the human venture. Man has acquired such decisive power that his future depends essentially on how he will use it. However, the business of human life has become so complicated that he is culturally unprepared even to understand his new position clearly. As a consequence, his current predicament is not only worsening but, with the accelerated tempo of events, may become decidedly catastrophic in a not too distant future. The downward trend of human fortunes can be countered and reversed only by the advent of a new humanism essentially based on and aiming at man’s cultural development, that is, a substantial improvement in human quality throughout the world."

The Club of Rome insisted that lasting solutions would not be found by focusing on specific problems, but by transforming the condition from which they all stem, which they called "problematique".

Can the proposed 'headlights' help us "find a way to change course"?

Why did Peccei's call to action remain unanswered? Why wasn't The Club of Rome's purpose—to illuminate the course our civilization has taken—served by our society's regular institutions, as part of their function? Isn't this already showing that we are 'driving with candle headlights'?

If we used knowledge federation to 'illuminate the way'—what difference would that make?

The Holotopia project is conceived as a knowledge federation-based response to Aurelio Peccei's call to action.

We coined the keyword holotopia as a placeholder for the vision, and the cultural and social order of things that will result from this quest.

The mission of the Holotopia project is to evolve (a prototype of) a pair of 'headlights', in actual practice, by which this new course will become visible; and to initiate the transformative cultural and social processes that are necessary for this vision to be realized.

To prime this work, we have developed an initial Holotopia prototype, which includes both an initial vision, and a project infrastructure. This prototype is described on these pages.

A vision

The holotopia is not a utopia

Since Thomas More coined this term and described the first utopia, a number of visions of an ideal but non-existing social and cultural order of things have been proposed. But in view of harsh and contrasting realities, the word "utopia" acquired the negative meaning of an unrealizable fancy.

As the optimism regarding our future faded, apocalyptic or "dystopian" visions became common. The "protopias" emerged as a compromise, where the focus is on smaller but practically realizable improvements.

The holotopia is different in spirit from them all. It is a more attractive vision of the future than what the common utopias offered—whose authors either lacked the information to see what was possible, or lived in the times when the resources we have did not yet exist. And yet the holotopia is readily realizable—because we already have the information and other resources that are needed for its fulfillment.

Making things whole

What do we need to do to change course toward the holotopia?

From a comprehensive body of insights from which the holotopia emerges as a future realistically worth aiming for, we have distilled a simple principle or rule of thumb—"making things whole". And we suggested that principle by the holotopia's very name.

We must see ourselves as parts in a larger whole; and act in ways that make this larger whole more whole.

You will recognize that this principle is also suggested by the Modernity ideogram: Instead of reifying our institutions and professions, and merely acting in them competitively to improve "our own" situation or condition, we consider ourselves and what we do as functional elements in a larger system or systems; and we self-organize, and act, as it may best suit their, and our, wholeness.

Imagine if academic and other knowledge-workers collaborated to serve and develop planetary wholeness – what magnitude of benefits would result!

A method

Seeing things whole

To make things whole, we must be able to see things whole.

To highlight that the knowledge federation methodology we are proposing affords that very capability, in the context of the holotopia we refer to it by its pseudonym holoscope.

The characteristics of our current prototype of the holoscope—the main design choices or design patterns, how they follow from published insights, and why they are necessary for 'illuminating the way'—will become obvious in the course of this presentation. One characteristic, however, must be made clear from the start.

Looking at all sides

Holoscope.jpeg
Holoscope ideogram

If we consider it as our goal to "discover an objectively true reality picture", then whatever challenges our current "reality picture" will be perceived as "controversial".

When, however, our goal is to allow the way we look at the world to change and evolve further, to make us capable of seeing things whole and making them whole, then this very attitude needs to be modified. In the holoscope, the co-existence of a multiplicity of views, even when they might appear to contradict one another, is axiomatic. Those views are not considered as competing or contradictory "reality pictures", but as legitimate ways to look a situation or issue, necessary if we should see it from all sides, correctly assess its condition, and see what needs to be done.

This change of attitude becomes mandatory when our goal is not to see whether a hand-held cup is whole or cracked, but whether our 'bus' or civilization has defects that must be attended to. Then a discovery of a way of looking that reveals a defect, even when that defect is only a possibility, needs to be given the kind of prerogatives that scientific discoveries have in the traditional academia.

By allowing for a multiplicity of views, we also give ignored but potentially transformative ideas 'citizenship rights'.

Knowledge federation can now be understood as collective thinking or sense making, whereby overarching insights ("the cup is cracked") are distilled from a multitude of data, and acted on. And as a social process that keeps a multiplicity of views coherent with one another; and of course also with academic result and other cultural artifacts; and with the people's and the society's contemporary needs.

A way of looking or scope that illuminates an entire whole from a specific angle is called aspect. As suggested by the Holoscope ideogram, the art of using the holoscope will to a large degree consist in finding a suitable collection of aspects—"suitable" because each of them alone affords a simple and clear view of the whole; and because when combined together, they show the whole from all sides, and reveal the main point, what we above all need to know.

Thinking outside the box

That “we cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them" is a commonplace. A salient technical novelty in the holoscope is that free and deliberate choice of what we look at and how, which in our technical jargon is called scope, is made possible on rigorously academic grounds.

To liberate our thinking from the narrow frame of inherited concepts and methods, and allow for deliberate choice of scopes, we used "the scientific method" as the venture point, and modified it by taking recourse to state of the art insights in science and philosophy.

Science gave us new ways to look at the world: The telescope and the microscope enabled us to see the things that are too distant or too small to be seen by the naked eye, and our vision expanded beyond bounds. But science had the tendency to keep us focused on things that were either too distant or too small to be relevant—compared to all those large things or issues nearby, which now demand our attention. The holoscope is conceived as a way to look at the world that helps us see any chosen thing or theme as a whole—from all sides; and in proportion.


FiveInsights.JPG
Five Insights ideogram

Illuminating problems to see solutions

Suppose that you had a flexible searchlight, which you could point at any theme or issue and illuminate what remained hidden while we looked at it 'in the light of the candle' (in the habitual or traditional way). Your goal is to see sweepingly large possibilities for improving our condition, by "changing course"; to see how, realistically, improvements can be made on the scale that marked the Renaissance and the Enlightenment. What would you point it at? What would you see?

The holotopia vision is made concrete in terms of a collection of five such scopes and views; or five insights.

In the spirit of the holoscope, we here provide for each of them only a concise high-level view, a summary of its main point or points; and we present the supporting evidence and details in the corresponding detailed view or module.

There we will see that not only those issues have been diagnosed, but that also solutions too have been identified and proposed—characteristically a half-century ago. We shall then also see how right Postman was, when observing that "the tie between information and action has been severed".